Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Arrhenius plots observed rate constants, 208

As shown in the previous seetion (Figs 6 and 7), the magnitude of koBs decreases as the temperature decreases until a limiting value is reached. The pattern is similar to that observed with parent singlet phenylnitrene (Fig. 3). As before, the temperature-independent observed rate constants are associated with kisc- Plots of In (koBs —kjsc) were linear (Figs 10, 11) and these plots were used to deduce the Arrhenius parameters to cyclization of the substituted singlet arylnitrenes (Tables 2, 4 and 6). [Pg.274]

The long time limit was chosen to be the time where the transient absorption reaches a maximum.) We observe three relaxation processes (i.e., N — 3). The kinetic phases are well separated in time, spanning hundreds of nanoseconds to hunderds of microseconds. The amplitudes contribute more or less equally to the total decay, the slowest phase contributing the least. What is particularly interesting, however, is that the relaxation times for the 1620 cm-1 data are faster than those at 1661 cm-1. This is easily seen in Fig. 17.7 where the observed rate constants (1/t = kohs — kF + ku) for each phase are plotted in Arrhenius coordinates (i.e., In feobs vs. 1/T). The activation enthalpy ATP can then be determined from the slope according to... [Pg.367]

The Constant—Parameter Arrhenius Plot (CPAP) technique uses in addition the effect of temperature. The observed rate constants are plotted in an Arrhenius form at a constant value of the deactivation parameter, r i.e., one curve for points lepieseuting the fresh catalyst (t = 0), etc. For each curve, a low—temperature asymptote and a high-temperature asymptote can be drawn, and these can be extrapolated to intersect at a point with coordinates 1/T ( r), ta k (ir). Then, as shown in ref. (1), the values of k.. ... [Pg.230]

Figure 8. Arrhenius treatments of the intercepts of plots of the observed rate constant of ylide formation versus pyridine concentration obtained by LFP of dimethyldiazirine and dimethyldiazirine-d6 in perfluorohexane. Reprinted with permission from Ford, F. Yuzawa, T. Platz, M.S. Matzinger, S. Fulscher, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 4430. Figure 8. Arrhenius treatments of the intercepts of plots of the observed rate constant of ylide formation versus pyridine concentration obtained by LFP of dimethyldiazirine and dimethyldiazirine-d6 in perfluorohexane. Reprinted with permission from Ford, F. Yuzawa, T. Platz, M.S. Matzinger, S. Fulscher, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 4430.
A very early example in which the existence of two parallel paths has been deduced from the temperature dependence of the observed rate constant is the reaction between hydrogen and sulfur to yield hydrogen sulfide (121) the two paths are assumed to be a surface reaction independent of pressure, and a gas phase reaction whose rate depends on pressure. The evidence as given by the authors would not be acceptable today. However, we replotted their results in the form of an Arrhenius plot and found it to be indeed curved upward. [Pg.257]

The activation energies are in reasonable agreement with the experimental data for Arrhenius equations. The preexponential factors, however, are not so good. A better agreement is obtained with the modified Arrhenius equation. Now, the preexponential factors and temperature dependence are reasonable, and activation energies are not far from experimental value (MADs are under 1 kcal/mol). From a kinetic point of view, however, the description is semiquantitative at best. If one plots the rate constants obtained theoretically and experimentally for these reactions, the picture shown in Fig. 3 is obtained. There is a quite a difference between experimental and theoretical data at each temperature, which could be adjusted by a simple multiplicative factor for each reaction. The calculations predict that the ratio of formation of the 1-propyl radical to the 2-propyl radical would be about 5 times faster theoretically than observed experimentally. Both theoretically and experimentally, one observes that increase in the temperature equalizes the rate of formation of both radicals, but experimentally this happens faster than what the theoretical calculations predict. This failure is not corrected even considering internal rotation to perform more precise thermochemical calculations. [Pg.71]

As an illustration of these considerations, the Arrhenius plot of the electron-transfer rate constant, observed by DeVault and Chance [1966] (see also DeVault [1984]), is shown in fig. 13. [Pg.30]

The temperature dependence of A predicted by Eq. (5-11) makes a very weak contribution to the temperature dependence of the rate constant, which is dominated by the exponential term. It is, therefore, not feasible to establish, on the basis of temperature studies of the rate constant, whether the predicted dependence of A is observed experimentally. Uncertainties in estimates of A tend to be quite large because this parameter is, in effect, determined by a long extrapolation of the Arrhenius plot to 1/T = 0. [Pg.190]

Arrhenius equation The equation In k = In A — EJRT for the commonly observed temperature dependence of a rate constant k. An Arrhenius plot is a graph of In k against 1/T. [Pg.941]

The TGA system was a Perkin-Elmer TGS-2 thermobalance with System 4 controller. Sample mass was 2 to 4 mgs with a N2 flow of 30 cc/min. Samples were initially held at 110°C for 10 minutes to remove moisture and residual air, then heated at a rate of 150°C/min to the desired temperature set by the controller. TGA data from the initial four minutes once the target pyrolysis temperature was reached was not used to calculate rate constants in order to avoid temperature lag complications. Reaction temperature remained steady and was within 2°C of the desired temperature. The actual observed pyrolysis temperature was used to calculate activation parameters. The dimensionless "weight/mass" Me was calculated using Equation 1. Instead of calculating Mr by extrapolation of the isothermal plot to infinity, Mr was determined by heating each sample/additive to 550°C under N2. This method was used because cellulose TGA rates have been shown to follow Arrhenius plots (4,8,10-12,15,16,19,23,26,31). Thus, Mr at infinity should be the same regardless of the isothermal pyrolysis temperature. A few duplicate runs were made to insure that the results were reproducible and not affected by sample size and/or mass. The Me values were calculated at 4-minute intervals to give 14 data points per run. These values were then used to... [Pg.337]

Modify the program to study isothermal differential calorimetry by operating at constant temperature for a series of runs. Estimate the activation energy with Arrhenius plots from the rates observed at constant conversion. [Pg.260]

The Horiuti group treats the temperature coefficient of the rate differently from the way it is usually treated in TST. They clearly identify E as the experimentally observed activation energy, but according to TST [cf. Eq. (5)] the (E — RT) quantity of Eq. (52) is the enthalpy of activation. The RT term in Eq. (5) arises because the assumption that the Arrhenius plot is linear is equivalent to the assumption that the preexponential factor A of the Arrhenius equation is constant, whereas, according to TST, A always contains the factor (kT/h). In addition, the partition function factors of Table I are also part of A, and most of them are functions of T. Since the Horiuti group takes this temperature dependency of the preexponential factor into account, the factor exp[(5/2)(vi -I- V2)] (where 5/2 is replaced by 3 for nonlinear molecules) arises. [Pg.113]

To a first approximation over the relatively small temperature range encountered in the troposphere, A is found to be independent of temperature for many reactions, so that a plot of In k versus T l gives a straight line of slope —E.d/R and intercept equal to In A. However, the Arrhenius expression for the temperature dependence of the rate constant is empirically based. As the temperature range over which experiments could be carried out was extended, nonlinear Arrhenius plots of In k against T 1 were observed for... [Pg.138]

Conversely, at the lower temperatures, the rate constant for H-abstraction is small while, at the same time, the rate of adduct decomposition is lowered. As a result, at the lower temperatures (right side of Fig. 6.11), adduct formation predominates and a negative temperature dependence, as well as a dependence on pressure is observed for the overall rate constant. In the intermediate region, both addition and abstraction are occurring at significant rates, leading to the curved OH decay plots in Fig. 6.10 and the discontinuities in the Arrhenius plots of Fig. 6.11. [Pg.208]

The observed apparent first-order rate constants are listed in Table I. From the constants at different temperatures but at the same initiator concentration, it is possible to calculate an apparent activation energy for the propagation reaction in each case. This has been done, and the Arrhenius plot is shown in Figure 5. It is interesting to note the similarity of these... [Pg.534]

Temperature Dependence of the Activity and Selectivity of Xylene Isomerization over AP Catalyst. Based upon our analysis of the intracrystalline diffusional resistance in AP catalyst, we would expect that when the reaction temperature is increased, the selectivity would shift toward p-xylene since the diffusional effects are increased as the activity increases. A shift in selectivity toward p-xylene as the reaction temperature was increased was observed and is shown in Figure 6. The role of diffusion in changing the selectivity can be seen in the Arrhenius plot of Figure 7. The reaction rate constant for the o-xylene - p-xylene path, fc+3i, goes from an almost negligible value at 300°F to a substantial value at 600°F. Furthermore, the diffusional effects are also demonstrated by the changing... [Pg.547]


See other pages where Arrhenius plots observed rate constants, 208 is mentioned: [Pg.87]    [Pg.436]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.931]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.571]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.428]    [Pg.430]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.692]    [Pg.182]   


SEARCH



Arrhenius constant

Arrhenius plot

Arrhenius plot constants

Arrhenius rate

Arrhenius rate constant

Rate constants observed

Rate observed

© 2024 chempedia.info