Surface, apparent area

The currently useful model for dealing with rough surfaces is that of the selfsimilar or fractal surface (see Sections VII-4C and XVI-2B). This approach has been very useful in dealing with the variation of apparent surface area with the size of adsorbate molecules used and with adsorbent particle size. All adsorbate molecules have access to a plane surface, that is, one of fractal dimension 2. For surfaces of Z> > 2, however, there will be regions accessible to small molecules... 

All the isotherms give rise to BET plots which are linear over a limited range (e.g. for isotherm E, 001

[Pg.213]

Wynne-Jones and Marshfound somewhat similar results with a number of carbons made by pyrolysis of eight organic polymers at a series of temperatures. The isotherms of Nj at 77 K and of COj at 195 K were measured, and the apparent surface area calculated by the usual BET procedure. (Owing to the microporous nature of the solids, these figures for area will be roughly proportional to the uptake at saturation and therefore... 

The counter-electrode (CE) was a 40 at.% RuC>2 (the remainder being Ti oxide) electrode, having more than 100 times the apparent surface area of the WE. It was positioned inside a Teflon tube to minimise the amount of hydrogen gas that could be released into the cell solution. An Ag/AgCl electrode was employed as the reference electrode (RE) at high temperatures, while a saturated calomel electrode (SCE) generally served as the RE at room temperature. 

The polycrystalline platinum electrode was mounted in Kel>F resin and polished with a scries of alumina powders down to 0.05, resulting mirror finish. The apparent surface area was 1.85 cm. The electrode was washed with fuming sulfuric add and rinsed with ultra pure water prior to each measurement. 

Dollimore and Heal (6) have shown that in calculating a surface area from adsorption data, it is possible to calculate an apparent surface area which is approximately one-fourth the actual surface area. This error occurs when the adsorbate molecule... 

Porous carbon materials mostly consist of carbon and exhibit appreciable apparent surface area and micropore volume (MPV) [1-3], They are solids with a wide variety of pore size distributions (PSDs), which can be prepared in different forms, such as powders, granules, pellets, fibers, cloths,... 

Physical adsorption of gases and vapors is a powerful tool for characterizing the porosity of carbon materials. Each system (adsorbate-adsorbent temperature) gives one unique isotherm, which reflects the porous texture of the adsorbent. Many different theories have been developed for obtaining information about the solid under study (pore volume, surface area, adsorbent-adsorbate interaction energy, PSD, etc.) from the adsorption isotherms. When these theories and methods are applied, it is necessary to know their fundamentals, assumptions, and applicability range in order to obtain the correct information. For example, the BET method was developed for type II isotherms therefore, if the BET equation is applied to other types of isotherms, it will not report the surface area but the apparent surface area. 

The recent contribution by Kaneko et al. (1995) has revealed that it is possible to produce highly hydrophobic fluorinated microporous carbon fibres. Two fluorinated carbons were reported to have apparent surface areas of 420 and 340 m2g and micropore volumes of, respectively, 0.19 and 0.14cm3g 1. These materials gave Type I nitrogen and methanol isotherms, but the adsorption of water vapour was too small to measure at pjp° < 0.8 and the uptake was very low even at p/p° 1. 

Values of apparent surface area can be derived only if the solute isotherm exhibits a long saturation plateau. Unfortunately, the derived values are often of questionable significance since the exact structure of the monolayer (containing both solute and solvent) is rarely known. The study of microporosity by adsorption from solution measurements is in its infancy, but the use of comparison plots appears to be a promising approach. 

Textural characterisation was carried out by physical adsorption of N2 at -196 °C. The apparent surface areas of the samples were obtained by using the BET equation [5]. 

The adsorption isotherms of nitrogen at -196 °C for the samples studied are shown in Fig. 4. All the isotherms are type II in the BDDT classification [10]. The BET apparent surface areas values are in Fig. 4. The increase in the temperature of treatment produces a decrease in the amount of nitrogen adsorbed, with an important decrease in the BET areas due to an ordering in the sample structure. The great differences in the BET surface areas of the samples make it possible to measure a wide range of aetive surface areas. 

Fig. 4. N2 adsorption isotherms at -196 °C for the samples studied and their BET apparent surface area values.

The limestone used in the AFBC was deeply characterized. The limestone SEM-EDX analysis shows Ca as the unique identified element and its XRD analysis shows calcite as the only crystalline chemical species. After heat treatment at 100"C, calcite showed an apparent surface area of 19 m /g, 48.5% porosity with unimodal small pores of 5.5nm. The coal burned in the AFBC plant was a low-rank coal with 0.5-1 imn particle size. 

Textural characterisation of the samples was carried out by measuring apparent density (mercury at 0.1 MPa), mercury porosimetry and N2 and CO2 adsorption isotherms, at -196 and 0 °C, respectively. The apparent surface areas of the samples were obtained by using the BET equation [5]. The micropore size analysis was performed by means of the t-plot and the Dubinin-Astakhov methods [6]. 

Although the BET theory is based on an unrealistic model, there is a generally accepted convention [8] of applying the BET-nitrogen method in order to obtain the values of the apparent surface area. The results are shown in Table 2, which also includes the range of linearity of the BET equation. It can be observed in this table that the apparent surface areas increase significantly with the degree of bum-off. 

Thus, the apparent surface area of the most activated sample (PC76) is nearly four times higher than that of sample PC12 (2468 versus 668 m g, respectively). In addition, the Cbet value decreases from 1976 for PC 12 to 100 for PC76, indicating that the samples present bigger micropores as the bum-off degree increases. 

The activation of PET waste produce carbon materials suitable for using as active carbons, with very high BET apparent surface areas -up to 2468 m g" -. These active carbons are mainly microporous, with low meso and macroporosity. It was observed that the increase in the activation degree (i.e., bum-off) produces a gradual increase in the volume of total micropores, probably by enlarging the small micropores besides creating new porosity. Further studies on this topic are ongoing. 

For the ACs the data are representative of the samples after heat-treatment at all three temperatures since during their fabrication these materials have already been treated at temperatures in excess of 850°C. However, for the alumina and clay samples the surface areas and pore volumes are shown after treatment at each temperature as these materials undergo various phase transitions that lead to sintering of the samples and shifts in their relative pore size distributions with heat-treatment. The particle size was determined from the corresponding MIP curve for the powder raw material. The Sbet in the case of microporous ACs should be considered as an apparent surface area due to the micropore filling mechanism associated with these materials [15]. The external area and micropore volumes were calculated from the slope and intercept of the t-plots of the corresponding isotherms. The total pore volume was taken as the amount of gas adsorbed at a relative pressure of 0.96 on the desorption isotherm, equivalent to a pore diameter of 50 nm. The mesopore volume was calculated from the difference in the total pore volume and the micropore volume. 

Porous surfaces present a different problem because the actual surface area, including the interior of the pores, is many multiples of the apparent surface area. Therefore, a porous surface is much more difficult... 

As can be seen from Figure 2, CO2 adsorption data for all the samples are well described by the DR- equation. Consequently, the total micropore volume (evaluation procedure described in detail elsewhere (14). 

---