Anharmonicity structure

Hollenstein H, Marquardt R, Quack M and Suhm M A 1994 Dipole moment function and equilibrium structure of methane In an analytical, anharmonic nine-dimenslonal potential surface related to experimental rotational constants and transition moments by quantum Monte Carlo calculations J. Chem. Phys. 101 3588-602... 

The influence of solvent can be incorporated in an implicit fashion to yield so-called langevin modes. Although NMA has been applied to allosteric proteins previously, the predictive power of normal mode analysis is intrinsically limited to the regime of fast structural fluctuations. Slow conformational transitions are dominantly found in the regime of anharmonic protein motion. 

CHEOPS is based on the method of atomic constants, which uses atom contributions and an anharmonic oscillator model. Unlike other similar programs, this allows the prediction of polymer network and copolymer properties. A list of 39 properties could be computed. These include permeability, solubility, thermodynamic, microscopic, physical and optical properties. It also predicts the temperature dependence of some of the properties. The program supports common organic functionality as well as halides. As, B, P, Pb, S, Si, and Sn. Files can be saved with individual structures or a database of structures. 

The observation of the departure from cubic symmetry above Tm co-incident with the appearance of the central peak scattering serves to resolve the conflict between dynamic and lattice strain models. The departure from cubic symmetry may be attributed to a shift in the atomic equilibrium position associated with the soft-mode anharmonicity. In such a picture, the central peak then becomes the precusor to a Bragg reflection for the new structure. 

T. Riste, Anharmonic Lattices, Structural Transitions and Melting, Noordhoff, Leiden, 1974. 

The approach to the evaluation of vibrational spectra described above is based on classical simulations for which quantum corrections are possible. The incorporation of quantum effects directly in simulations of large molecular systems is one of the most challenging areas in theoretical chemistry today. The development of quantum simulation methods is particularly important in the area of molecular spectroscopy for which quantum effects can be important and where the goal is to use simulations to help understand the structural and dynamical origins of changes in spectral lineshapes with environmental variables such as the temperature. The direct evaluation of quantum time- correlation functions for anharmonic systems is extremely difficult. Our initial approach to the evaluation of finite temperature anharmonic effects on vibrational lineshapes is derived from the fact that the moments of the vibrational lineshape spectrum can be expressed as functions of expectation values of positional and momentum operators. These expectation values can be evaluated using extremely efficient quantum Monte-Carlo techniques. The main points are summarized below. 

With data averaged in point group m, the first refinements were carried out to estimate the atomic coordinates and anisotropic thermal motion parameters IP s. We have started with the atomic coordinates and equivalent isotropic thermal parameters of Joswig et al. [14] determined by neutron diffraction at room temperature. The high order X-ray data (0.9 < s < 1.28A-1) were used in this case in order not to alter these parameters by the valence electron density contributing to low order structure factors. Hydrogen atoms of the water molecules were refined isotropically with all data and the distance O-H were kept fixed at 0.95 A until the end of the multipolar refinement. The inspection of the residual Fourier maps has revealed anharmonic thermal motion features around the Ca2+ cation. Therefore, the coefficients up to order 6 of the Gram-Charlier expansion [15] were refined for the calcium cation in the scolecite. 

In general, all observed intemuclear distances are vibrationally averaged parameters. Due to anharmonicity, the average values will change from one vibrational state to the next and, in a molecular ensemble distributed over several states, they are temperature dependent. All these aspects dictate the need to make statistical definitions of various conceivable, different averages, or structure types. In addition, since the two main tools for quantitative structure determination in the vapor phase—gas electron diffraction and microwave spectroscopy—interact with molecular ensembles in different ways, certain operational definitions are also needed for a precise understanding of experimental structures. 

K. Kuchitsu and L. S. Bartell, Effects of Anharmonicity of Molecular Vibrations on The Diffraction of Electrons. II. Interpretation of Experimental Structural Parameters, J. Chem. Phys., 35 (1961) 1945-1949. 

A complete analysis of the vibrational spectrum had to wait until we were able to prepare T-36 via the photoisomerization of S-2. Even if an anharmonic approximation was taken in account in the calculation (UMP2/6-31G ) the IR spectrum was still in poor agreement with the observed spectrum.64 But one thing was clear formula T-36 does not represent the real structure of propargylene, since no IR band in the expected region for the C,C triple bond vibration of an acetylene was found, but a C,C stretching vibration at 1620 cm-1 was registered instead. 

The harmonic frequencies and the anharmonic constants may be obtained from experimental vibrational spectra, although their determination becomes difficult as the size of the system increases. In Table 1.10, we have listed experimental harmonic and anharmonic contributions to the AEs. These contributions may also be obtained from electronic-structure calculations of quadratic force fields (for harmonic frequencies) and cubic and quartic force fields (for anharmonic constants). For some of the larger molecules in Table 1.11, we have used ZPVEs calculated at the CCSD(T)/cc-pVTZ level or higher, see Ref. 12. In some cases, both experimental and theoretical ZPVEs are available and agree to within 0.3 kJ/mol [12, 57],... 

Although the harmonic ZPVE must always be taken into account in the calculation of AEs, the anharmonic contribution is much smaller (but oppositely directed) and may sometimes be neglected. However, for molecules such as H2O, NH3, and CH4, the anharmonic corrections to the AEs amount to 0.9, 1.5, and 2.3 kJ/mol and thus cannot be neglected in high-precision calculations of thermochemical data. Comparing the harmonic and anharmonic contributions, it is clear that a treatment that goes beyond second order in perturbation theory is not necessary as it would give contributions that are small compared with the errors in the electronic-structure calculations. 

Wu, G. (1991), The Semiclassical Fixed Point Structure of Three Coupled Anharmonic Oscillators Under SU(3) Algebra with Iz = 0, Chem. Phys. Letts. 179, 29. 

---