Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Localization Anderson

However, solution of the mean field equations is not trivial and this topic need not be discussed here. [Pg.295]

It has been seen in the previous section that the ratio of the onsite electron-electron Coulomb repulsion and the one-electron bandwidth is a critical parameter. The Mott-Hubbard insulating state is observed when U W, that is, with narrow-band systems like transition metal compounds. Disorder is another condition that localizes charge carriers. In crystalline solids, there are several possible types of disorder. One kind arises from the random placement of impurity atoms in lattice sites or interstitial sites. The term Anderson localization is applied to systems in which the charge carriers are localized by this type of disorder. Anderson localization is important in a wide range of materials, from phosphorus-doped silicon to the perovskite oxide strontium-doped lanthanum vanadate, Lai cSr t V03. [Pg.295]

In the second quantization language, the tight-binding Hamiltonian is written as  [Pg.295]

Consider the simplest possible case, a monatomic crystalline solid. The potential at each lattice site is represented by a single square well in the Kronig-Penney model (Kronig and Penney, 1931) by Ralph Kronig (1904-1995) and William G. Penney (1909-1991). For a perfect monatomic crystaHine array (Fig. 7.3a), all the potential [Pg.295]

In all substances, at high temperatures, the electrical resistivity is dominated by inelastic scattering of the electrons by phonons, and other electrons. As classical particles, the electrons travel on trajectories that resemble random walks, but their apparent motion is diffusive over large-length scales because there is enough constructive interference to allow propagation to continue. Ohm s law holds and with increasing numbers of inelastic [Pg.296]


Certain properties of the disordered alloy are qualitatively different from the properties of an intermetallic compound. A simple example of a property that demonstrates this qualitative difference is the finite residual resistivity of the disordered alloy, which is the resistivity in the limit as the temperature approaches zero. An ordered intermetallic compound will have a resistivity at T=0 that is essentially zero or infinity. A less simple example is Anderson localization. ... [Pg.3]

The delocalization of the HOMO and LUMO arises from pseudo-ir orbital interactions between adjacent 3px and 3py atomic orbitals of Si atoms, respectively. Since the 3p orbital is on the Si-Si-Si plane, the degree of the interaction depends on the dihedral angle between adjacent Si-Si-Si planes. Fluctuation of the dihedral angles along the polymer skeleton then causes the so-called Anderson localization of the HOMO and LUMO [41]. [Pg.633]

Anderson localization is the localization of electrons on low-dimensional materials, which is induced by the irregularity of the periodic potential field [43]. Figure 17 gives a schematic representation of Anderson localization of a particle in one-dimensional box. The same is true for an electron on a polymer skeleton. A localized state in a completely periodic... [Pg.633]

Figure 17 Schematic representation of Anderson localization of a particle in one-dimensional box. Figure 17 Schematic representation of Anderson localization of a particle in one-dimensional box.
Figure 19 Schematic representation of the molecular structures of flexible polysilane with Anderson-localized charge carrier (upper) and rigid polysilane with delocalized charge carrier. Figure 19 Schematic representation of the molecular structures of flexible polysilane with Anderson-localized charge carrier (upper) and rigid polysilane with delocalized charge carrier.
Figure 6.33 (a) Anderson localization due to disorder in site potentials. For comparison, potentials in a regular lattice are also shown in (b), fV is one-electron band-width in the absence of the random potential Vq. Localization is determined by (fV/y) ratio. [Pg.348]

J. Floss and I. Sh. Averbukh. Quantum resonance, Anderson localization, and selective manipulations in molecular mixtures by ultrashort laser pulses. Phys. Rev. A, 86(2) 021401 (2012). [Pg.411]

We discuss in this section the effect of short-range interaction on the Anderson-localized states of a Fermi glass described in Chapter 1, Section 7, and in particular the question of whether the states are singly or doubly occupied. Ball (1971) was the first to discuss this problem. In this section we consider an electron gas that is far on the metal side of the Wigner transition (Chapter 8) the opposite situation is described in Chapter 6, where correlation gives rise to a metal-insulator transition. We also suppose that Anderson localization is weak (cca 1) otherwise it is probable that all states are singly occupied. [Pg.82]

Our problem is to estimate A . It is the mean repulsive energy of a pair of charges at a distance or1 from each other. This will depend on the effective dielectric constant of the electron gas. This should be large for weak Anderson localization and will effectively screen out the repulsion, except when both electrons are in the same atom. We therefore write... [Pg.82]

Buyers et al (1971) discussed evidence for the existence of Anderson-localized spin states m antiferromagnets in which there is disorder. They investigated the substitutionally disordered materials K(Co,Mn)F3 and (Co,Mn)F2, finding two branches of propagating spin waves corresponding to the two constituents and... [Pg.117]

A further argument against a transition in the conduction band is given by the present author (Mott 1983), who maintains that in the conduction band it is impossible that the random situation of the donors should give disorder strong enough to produce Anderson localization. [Pg.166]

Throughout we make use of the pseudogap model outlined in Chapter 1, Section 16- A valence and conduction band overlap, forming a pseudogap (Fig. 10.1). States in the gap can be Anderson-localized. A transition of pure Anderson type to a metallic state (i.e. without interaction terms) can occur when electron states become delocalized at EF. If the bands are of Hubbard type, the transition can be discontinuous (a Mott transition). [Pg.230]

We note that at the consolute point the conductivity is still metallic, the appearance of an activation energy e2 occurring for somewhat lower concentrations. The reason for this, in our view, is as follows. The consolute point should occur approximately at the same concentration as the kink in the free-energy curve of Fig. 4.2, namely that at which the concentration n of carriers is of order given by n1/3aH 0.2. Above the consolute point there is no sudden disappearance of the electron gas as the concentration decreases its entropy stabilizes it, so metallic behaviour extends to lower concentrations, until Anderson localization sets in. Conduction, then, is due to excited electrons at the mobility edge, as discussed above. [Pg.253]

Kawabata, A. (1988) Anderson Localization (ed. T. Ando and H. Fukuyama), p. 116. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. [Pg.269]

Therefore the lack of an observable bleach can only be explained by the cancellation of all contributions to the pump-probe signal, which is the case for a perfect harmonic state. It can be shown that the anharmonicity of a vibrational exciton is a direct measure of its degree of delocalization [5]. Thus, we conclude that the free exciton state is almost perfectly delocalized at 90 K. As temperature increases, a bleach signal starts to be observed, pointing to a non-complete cancellation of the different contributions of the total pump-probe signal. Apparently, thermally induced disorder (Anderson localization) starts to localize the free exciton. The anharmonicity of the self-trapped state (1650 cm 1), on the other hand, originates from nonlinear interaction between the amide I mode and the phonon system of the crystal. It... [Pg.562]

The theory [15] cannot be applied to InO directly. But just as the divergence of the weak localization quantum corrections point to the Anderson localization, quantum corrections here point to the SIT. This returns us to the problem of low dimensions. Fluctuations are larger in the systems with low dimensions, but the difference is only quantitative and we may expect SIT... [Pg.88]

Value t — 2 for the granular metals has been confirmed experimentally in several papers (see, for example, Ref. [1]) however, for Nix(Si02)i A nanocomposite with granules of nanometer size it was found t x 2.7, g x 2 [65]. It rather essentially differs from the classical theory predictions. Also, the noticeable differences of the experimental values of critical indexes from the theoretical ones have been found in papers [66,67]. Authors of these papers attributed the discrepancy between the experimental data and results of the classical percolation theory to the quantum effects, which lead to the Anderson localization of charge carriers [57,58]. [Pg.610]

Attempts to take into account both localization and percolation or, in other words, to allow for quantum effects in percolation go back to Khmel-nitskii s pioneer paper [68]. The experimental attempts to study quantum effects in conductivity close to the percolation threshold have been undertaken in Refs. [69-71]. The physical sense of these results is stated in Ref. [71] and could be described as follows. The percolation cluster is non-uniform it includes both big conductive regions ( lakes ) and small regions (weak links or bottlenecks) which connect lakes to each other. On approaching the percolation threshold from the metallic side of the transition, these weak links become thinner and longer, and at x = xc the cluster breaks or tears into pieces just in such areas. As a result, exactly these conditions start to be sufficient for the electron localization. Thus, a percolation provokes an Anderson localization in bottlenecks of the percolation cluster. Sheng and collaborators [36,37,72] tried to take into account the influence of tunneling on conductivity for systems in the vicinity of the percolation transition. Similar attempts have been made in papers [38,56]. The obtained results prove that the possibility of tunneling shifts the percolation threshold toward smaller x values and affects material properties in its vicinity. [Pg.611]


See other pages where Localization Anderson is mentioned: [Pg.137]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.634]    [Pg.634]    [Pg.635]    [Pg.635]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.611]    [Pg.628]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.357]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.19 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.35 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.610 , Pg.628 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.295 , Pg.296 , Pg.297 , Pg.298 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.57 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.134 , Pg.144 , Pg.146 , Pg.182 , Pg.289 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.168 , Pg.355 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.358 , Pg.420 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.423 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.294 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.125 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.423 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.58 , Pg.156 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.46 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.33 , Pg.34 , Pg.105 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.103 ]




SEARCH



Anderson

Anderson-Hamiltonian localization

Anderson-localized states

Effect of the Hubbard U on Anderson localization

Electrons Anderson localization

Phase transitions Anderson localization

© 2024 chempedia.info