Analytical Generally agreed methods

As a consequence of EU Directive 78/142/EEC, which introduced a limitation of vinyl chloride monomer both as residual amount in final articles (QM lmg/kg) intended to come into contact with foodstuffs and in migration to food (SML not detectable LOD 0.01 mg/kg), the corresponding necessary analytical methods were developed between several European expert laboratories and laid down as agreed methods in EU Directives 80/766/EEC and 81/432/EEC, respectively. This piece of the EU harmonization process was too time- and work-consuming to continue in this way. The vinyl chloride Directives therefore remain a unique feature in EU food packaging legislation since this was found to be impractical for generalization. 

Taking the multi-national project structure and the above involvement of CEN TC194/SC1/WG2 into account, the co-ordinators and all other project participants considered the methods presented (see Table 10-4) to be accepted as Europe-wide agreed analytical methods for specific migration determination of the respective monomers. The project consortium proposed the methods to the European Commission for recommendation as generally agreed or as useful methods of analysis for the Member States. 

Heat flow meter test results generally agree well with those generated hy absolute methods. The technique, which is easier to use and is a universally recognised standard test procedure [45], is also usable either for high accuracy measurements to support VIP analytical modelling/development or for fast tests for QA/QC programs. 

The precision of an analytical method is the degree to which individual determinations of a series of standards agree. Since in general only one laboratory is involved in the development of the method the precision, as determined by one laboratory by one operator over a relatively short time, is defined as repeatability r (ISO 1994 compare also Section 10.2.3). 

This is accomplished under the direction of an Associate Referee, who, as a specialist, is in turn operating under the guidance and administrative supervision of a General Referee. The procedural details have been described (6-7). A minimum of six samples are sent to not fewer than five laboratories to be studied by the selected method. The agreed definition of Collaborative Study (AOAC - CIPAC) is "An analytical study involving a number of laboratories analyzing the same sample(s) by the same method(s) for the purpose of validating the performance of the method(s) (5). 

Apart from any spectroscopic analytical evidence, PEO, when in the amorphous state and swollen by water (or isotonic saline) appears to be a potentially very bland material when contacted by platelets. Other methods should be used to ascertain whether PEO, appropriately rendered into a nondissolving network, represents a generally useful material as a container or conduit for blood. Our conclusions agree with results reported previously in References 5-9. 

F. Generalization This is a very low resolution, which agrees with Figure 18-22 since the peaks are clearly not separated. To obtain better resolution in an analytical system, much smaller particles would probably be used to drastically increase N. An alternative is to use different chromatographic packing that has a higher selectivity. In a preparative system these methods could be enployed and the column length would probably be increased. 

If, at this stage, the analyst feels that it is not possible to perform the analyses of the quality required to meet the customer s purpose within the latter s budget and/or within the time available, it is always best to be frank with the customer about the dilemma and help him/her to decide what to do about the situation. Any compromises that could lead to increased uncertainty in the method should be documented prior to sample analysis, along with how results will be reported in general. If an agreement (documented ) is reached to proceed, development of the analytical method in accord with the agreed analytical purpose can begin. 

In Ref [114], an approach to the dynamics of ionic surfactant adsorption was developed, which is simpler as both concept and application, but agrees very well with the experiment. Analytical asymptotic expressions for the dynamic surface tension of ionic surfactant solutions are derived in the general case of nonstationary interfacial expansion. Because the diffusion layer is much wider than the EDL, the equations contain a small parameter. The resulting perturbation problem is singular and it is solved by means of the method of matched asymptotic expansions [115]. The derived general expression for the dynamic surface tension is simplified for two important special cases, which are considered in the following section. 

It is not easy to determine which factors play the greatest role in obtaining good accuracy and precision. One must consider the assumptions inherent in the theory as well as the chemical, mechanical, and instrumental parameters. In general, gas chromatographic methods agree within 1-5% with other physicochemical methods. For example, Hussam and Carr (22) showed that in the measurement of vapor/liquid equilibria via headspace GC, complex thermodynamic and analytical correction factors were needed. These often came from other experimental measurements that were not necessarily accurately known. Another source of significant error can be in determination of the mass of stationary phase contained within the column (59). Other sources of error include measurement of holdup time (60), flowrate, sample mass, response factors, peak area, or baseline fidelity. 

---