Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Holdup time

For primary insulation or cable jackets, high production rates are achieved by extmding a tube of resin with a larger internal diameter than the base wke and a thicker wall than the final insulation. The tube is then drawn down to the desked size. An operating temperature of 315—400°C is preferred, depending on holdup time. The surface roughness caused by melt fracture determines the upper limit of production rates under specific extmsion conditions (76). Corrosion-resistant metals should be used for all parts of the extmsion equipment that come in contact with the molten polymer (77). [Pg.361]

At a holdup time longer than 10—15 min at a high temperature, resin degradation is avoided by keeping the rear of the cylinder at a lower temperature than the front. At short holdup times (4—5 min), cylinder temperatures are the same in rear and front. If melt fracture occurs, the injection rate is reduced pressures are in the range of 20.6—55.1 MPa (3000—8000 psi). Low backpressure and screw rotation rates should be used. [Pg.377]

Product Quality Considerations of product quahty may require low holdup time and low-temperature operation to avoid thermal degradation. The low holdup time eliminates some types of evaporators, and some types are also eliminated because of poor heat-transfer charac teristics at low temperature. Product quality may also dic tate special materials of construction to avoid met hc contamination or a catalytic effect on decomposition of the product. Corrosion may also influence evaporator selection, since the advantages of evaporators having high heat-transfer coefficients are more apparent when expensive materials of construction are indicated. Corrosion and erosion are frequently more severe in evaporators than in other types of equipment because of the high hquid and vapor velocities used, the frequent presence of sohds in suspension, and the necessary concentration differences. [Pg.1138]

For vaporAiquid separators there is often a liquid residence (holdup) time required for process surge. Tables 1, 2, and 3 give various rules of thumb for approximate work. The vessel design method in this chapter under the Vapor/Liquid Calculation Method heading blends the required liquid surge with the required vapor space to obtain the total separator volume. Finally, a check is made to see if the provided liquid surge allow s time for any entrained water to settle. [Pg.131]

Assign a length-to-diameter ratio of 5, and size a tank to accommodate the required holdup time. [Pg.135]

Instrument and Plant Air Systems. A typical setup for a large plant could include three to four 50% instrument air compressors and two 100% plant air compressors, with steam drives for normally operated units and electrical drives for spares. Common practice would provide an interconnection to allow makeup from plant air into instrument air, but not vice versa, and two sets (two 100% driers per set—one on-stream and one regenerating) of 1007c instrument air driers. Two main receivers on instrument air near the compressors with several minutes holdup time and satellite receivers at process trains would be likely and proper for feasibility cost estimating. [Pg.228]

Precipitation Softening. This process depends on sufficient holdup time within a vessel to allow sedimentation and clarification to occur. A coagulation chemical such as alum or iron salts added to the solution will improve the process efficiency. [Pg.157]

Riser termination. Good riser termination devices, such as closed cyclones, minimize the vapor and catalyst holdup time in the reactor vessel. This reduces unnecessary thermal cracking and nonselective catalytic re-cracking of the reactor product. The benefits are a reduction in dry gas and a subsequent improvement in conversion, gasoline octane, and flexibility for processing marginal feeds. [Pg.203]

Holdup time is 5 min half full for reflux drums, 5-10 min for a product feeding another tower. [Pg.17]

Thus the time constant for the process is equal to the mean residence or holdup time in the tank and has units of time, (volume/volumetric flow rate). [Pg.68]

During their passage through the column, sample molecules spend part of the time in the mobile phase and part in the stationary phase. All molecules spend the same amount of time in the mobile phase. This time is called the column dead tine or holdup time (t.) and is equivalent to the tine required for an unretained solute to reach the detector frsolute retention time (t,) is the time between the instant of saiq>le introduction and when the detector senses the maximum of the retained peak. This value is greater than the column holdup time by the amount of time the solute spends in the stationary phase and is called the adjusted retention time (t, ). These values lead to the fundamental relationship, equation (1.1), describing retention in gas and liquid chromatography. [Pg.7]

Where subscript s refers to the total systea and 1 and 2 the first and second columns, respectively, k the capacity factor, and t the gas holdup time [174,179]. The ratio Is called the relative... [Pg.35]

Mathematical methods for determining the gas holdup tine are based on the linearity of the plot of adjusted retention time against carbon number for a homologous series of compounds. Large errors in this case can arise from the anomalous behavior of early members of the homologous series (deviation from linearity in the above relationship). The accuracy with which the gas holdup time is determined by using only well retained members of a homologous series can be compromised by instability in the column temperature and carrier gas flow rate [353,357]. The most accurate estimates... [Pg.95]

Retention 4 adjusted 4 dead time 4 holdup time 4 net retention 5 relative pressure (GC) 4 series connected columns (GC) 59... [Pg.516]

Column Void Volume V. Retention volume corresponding to the column holdup time V. - V. [Pg.526]

The total retention of a given solute and the gas holdup time of an unretained solute eluting through two serially connected columns is the sum of the retentions in the individual column units, and thus we can write that... [Pg.553]

Plate Count Holdup Time (S) Particle or Diameter (m ) Lengt) Flow (m) Rate Peak St utd urd Deviation at k 0 ( tl)... [Pg.564]

Figur 4.31 Sequential, isocratic elution using a stepwise reduction in solvent strength to identify a binary solvent of acceptable strength for elution of a five ca x>nent mixture. In this example the column holdup time was 1 min. Figur 4.31 Sequential, isocratic elution using a stepwise reduction in solvent strength to identify a binary solvent of acceptable strength for elution of a five ca x>nent mixture. In this example the column holdup time was 1 min.
Fig. 2.4p shows three types of post-column reactor. In the open tubular reactor, after the solutes have been separated on the column, reagent is pumped into the column effluent via a suitable mixing tee. The reactor, which may be a coil of stainless steel or ptfe tube, provides the desired holdup time for the reaction. Finally, the combined streams are passed through the detector. This type of reactor is commonly used in cases where the derivatisation reaction is fairly fast. For slower reactions, segmented stream tubular reactors can be used. With this type, gas bubbles are introduced into the stream at fixed time intervals. The object of this is to reduce axial diffusion of solute zones, and thus to reduce extra-column dispersion. For intermediate reactions, packed bed reactors have been used, in which the reactor may be a column packed with small glass beads. [Pg.78]


See other pages where Holdup time is mentioned: [Pg.180]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.472]    [Pg.1140]    [Pg.1566]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.510]    [Pg.551]    [Pg.551]    [Pg.558]    [Pg.603]    [Pg.604]    [Pg.605]    [Pg.613]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.54]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.4 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.39 , Pg.58 , Pg.85 , Pg.164 , Pg.165 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.8 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.39 , Pg.58 , Pg.85 , Pg.164 , Pg.165 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.142 , Pg.162 , Pg.453 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.39 , Pg.58 , Pg.85 , Pg.164 , Pg.165 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.190 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.10 ]




SEARCH



Average holdup time

Holdup

Holdup time measurement

© 2024 chempedia.info