Amorphous catalyst surface area

Table III compares the gasoline composition from three steam deactivated catalyst systems. The first contains 10% rare earth exchanged faujasite (RE FAU) in an inert silica/clay matrix at a cell size of 2.446 nm the second contains 20% of an ultra stable faujasite (Z-14 USY) at a unit cell size of 2.426 nm in inert matrix. The third contains 50% amorphous high surface area silica-alumina (70% AI2O3 30% Si02) and 50% clay the nitrogen BET surface area of this catalyst after steam deactivation is 140 m /g. All three catalysts were deactivated for 4 hrs. at 100% steam and at 816°C.

Recently, amorphous high surface area vanadium aluminium oxynitrides have been reported as active catalysts for propane ammoxidation to yield acrylonitrile (AC) at atmospheric pressure. Optimal performance was achieved at 500°C using a C3Hg 02 NH3 molar ratio of 1.25 3 1 (see Tables 4 and 5). The space time yields of these catalysts have been reported to be much higher than for other catalysts reported in the literature. 

In consideration of the more extensive prior studies of supported Pt or Pd in oxidizing environments, some of the same techniques must also be applied to study the support. The transformation of the support due to exposure to the reaction environment has been proposed to be involved in catalyst dectivation as, for example, the transformation of amorphous alumina to alpha alumina as a support for Pt. Not only does the total catalyst surface area decrease due to this transformation, but the ability of the metal (as PtOx, for example) to interact with and "wet" the surface can be reduced drastically. The metal surface area can decrease precipitously. In order to follow and understand the deactivation of Pt- or Pd-based VOC catalysts, it is also necessary to study the general and specific morphology of the support. 

Although the dopant dissolves in the ceria lattice, we cannot rule out the presence of an amorphous dopant-rich phase at the surface of the catalyst (even after severe calcining). XPS + XRD measurements show a dopant-lean bulk and a dopant-rich surface. The structural similarity of the different catalysts is supported by the surface area-pore volume relationship (Figure 3). 

Control over the material s shape at the nanoscale enables further control over reactants access to the dopant, and ultimately affords a potent means of controlling function which is analogous to that parsimoniously employed by Nature to synthesize materials with myriad function with a surprisingly low number of material s building blocks. A nice illustration is offered by the extrusion catalytic polymerization of ethylene within the hexagonal channels of MCM-41 mesoporous silica doped with catalyst titanocene.36 The structure is made of amorphous silica walls spatially arranged into periodic arrays with high surface area (up to 1400 m2g 1) and mesopore volume >0.7 mLg-1. In this case, restricted conformation dictates polymerization the pore diameter... 

The precursor alloy is quenched to form small grains readily attacked by the caustic solution [31], Quenching can also enable specific intermetallic phases to be obtained, although this is less common. Yamauchi et al. [32-34] have employed a very fast quench to obtain a supersaturation of promoter species in the alloy. It is even possible to obtain an amorphous metal glass of an alloy, and Deng et al. [35] provide a review of this area, particularly with Ni, Ni-P, Ni-B, Ni-Co, and Ni-Co-B systems. The increased catalytic activity observed with these leached amorphous alloy systems can be attributed to either chemical promotion of the catalyzed reaction or an increased surface area of the leached catalyst, depending on the components present in the original alloy. Promotion with additives is considered in more detail later. 

The 11 nm-sized Ti02 were crystallized using either hydrothermal or thermal methods from 100 nm, amorphous gel spheres. The Ti02 crystal and agglomerate sizes were determined by X-ray diffraction (Philip 1080) and transmission electron microscopy (JEOL JEM 2010), respectively. The surface area and chemistry of the nanostructured Ti02 were analyzed by nitrogen physisorption (Coulter SA 3100) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR, Perkin-Elmer GX 2000). Metal catalyst was deposited by incipient... 

Most of the adsorbents used in the adsorption process are also useful to catalysis, because they can act as solid catalysts or their supports. The basic function of catalyst supports, usually porous adsorbents, is to keep the catalytically active phase in a highly dispersed state. It is obvious that the methods of preparation and characterization of adsorbents and catalysts are very similar or identical. The physical structure of catalysts is investigated by means of both adsorption methods and various instrumental techniques derived for estimating their porosity and surface area. Factors such as surface area, distribution of pore volumes, pore sizes, stability, and mechanical properties of materials used are also very important in both processes—adsorption and catalysis. Activated carbons, silica, and alumina species as well as natural amorphous aluminosilicates and zeolites are widely used as either catalyst supports or heterogeneous catalysts. From the above, the following conclusions can be easily drawn (Dabrowski, 2001) ... 

---