Advanced control system feedback

Machine process controls coordinate individual functions of the clamp, injection unit, ejector mechanism, and mold systems and accessories such as core pulls and unscrewing dies for threaded parts. The more advanced controls employ a feedback system (closed loop) to provide much tighter control over actual parameters vs. setpoints. High-level controls are capable of communicating with auxiliary equipment such as chillers, hopper loaders, mold temperature controllers, robots, etc., and displaying all machine parameters and conditions (Chapter 3)... 

The next major advancements in MOCVD control system technology are likely to be in the area of feedback control. First and foremost is the incorporation of real time in-situ process monitors that directly provide feedback into the ongoing deposition process. Second, the development of software which converts a user defined structure to the run parameters for each layer of the structure however, this development appears to be several years away. 

We discuss in this chapter analysers that arc highly automated, such as flow injection and discrete analyzers. In addition, laboratory robotic systems that are becoming more and more commonplace for sample handling and preparation arc also described. The latest advances in automation involve the development of microlluidic systems, which are sometimes called lab-on-a-chip or micro total analysis systems. These recent developnienis are also described here. It is important to note that the same principles of automatic analysis discussed here also apply to process control systems, which analyze the current state of a process and then use feedback to alter experimental variables in such a way that the current state and the desired state are nearly identical,... 

Feedback Control Systems Advanced Control Techniques... 

Feedback control is a fundamental concept that is employed in FID controllers as well as in advanced process control techniques. Figure 18.52 shows a simplified instrumentation diagram for feedback control of the stirred tank discussed earlier, where the inlet flow is equal to the outlet flow (hence, no level control is needed) and outlet temperature is controlled by the steam pressure. Figure 18.53 shows a generic block diagram for a feedback control system. In feedback control the controlled variable is measured... 

A successful laser weld in the application of a hermetic seal requires precision aiming stability, vibration isolation between the work surface and the environment, accurate location of the weld position, and real-time optical power feedback. Good coordination among the laser power supply, the motion control system, the vision system, the control computer, and operator is critical. Advanced laser-welding systems often have features, such as real-time power feedback, power ramping, and pulse shaping, to achieve the best weld quality possible. 

As mentioned earlier, successful operation of a process requires that key process variables such as flow rates, temperatures, pressures, and compositions be operated at or close to their set points. This Level 3a activity, regulatory control, is achieved by applying standard feedback and feedforward control techniques (Chapters 11-15). If the standard control techniques are not satisfactory, a variety of advanced control techniques are available (Chapters 16-18). In recent years, there has been increased interest in monitoring control system performance (Chapter 21). 

In this section we present an advanced control technique, time-delay compensation, which deals with a problematic area in process control—namely, the occurrence of significant time delays. Time delays commonly occur in the process industries because of the presence of distance velocity lags, recycle loops, and the analysis time associated with composition measurement. As discussed in Chapters 12 and 14, the presence of time delays in a process hmits the performance of a conventional feedback control system. From a frequency response perspective, a time delay adds phase lag to the feedback loop, which adversely affects closed-loop stabihty. Consequently, the controller gain must be reduced below the value that could be used if no time delay were present, and the response of the closed-loop system will be sluggish compared to that of the control loop with no time delay. 

At this point in the analysis, there are no remaining control degrees of freedom. However, the design of the plantwide control system is by no means complete advanced control methods that adjust the set points of already specified feedback controllers can be used to make the plant operate better. The objective here is to structure the control system in ways that avoid the need for operator intervention except when absolutely necessary. 

---