Adsorption, polymer block copolymers

Adsorption of block copolymers onto a surface is another pathway for surface functionalization. Block copolymers in solution of selective solvent afford the possibility to both self-assemble and adsorb onto a surface. The adsorption behavior is governed mostly by the interaction between the polymers and the solvent, but also by the size and the conformation of the polymer chains and by the interfacial contact energy of the polymer chains with the substrate [115-119], Indeed, in a selective solvent, one of the blocks is in a good solvent it swells and does not adsorb to the surface while the other block, which is in a poor solvent, will adsorb strongly to the surface to minimize its contact with the solvent. There have been a considerable number of studies dedicated to the adsorption of block copolymers to flat or curved surfaces, including adsorption of poly(/cr/-butylstyrcnc)-ft/od -sodium poly(styrenesulfonate) onto silica surfaces [120], polystyrene-Woc -poly(acrylic acid) onto weak polyelectrolyte multilayer surfaces [121], polyethylene-Wocfc-poly(ethylene oxide) on alkanethiol-patterned gold surfaces [122], or poly(ethylene oxide)-Woc -poly(lactide) onto colloidal polystyrene particles [123],... 

In a similar manner, several nanoparticles have been produced in the presence of block copolymers in selective solvents so as to form micelles that encapsulate particles such as metal salts. Consequently, these micelles are chemically converted to finely disperse colloidal hybrid polymer/metal particles with interesting catalytic, non-linear optic, semiconductor and magnetic properties [1, 20]. Finally, another area of potential application of amphiphilic block copolymers is that involving surface modification through the adsorption of block copolymer micelles or film formation. The use of a suitable micellar system allows for the alteration of specific surface characteristics, such as wetting and biocompatibility, or even enables the dispersion and stabilisation of solid pigment particles in a liquid or solid phase [1, 178]. 

Highly branched polymers, polymer adsorption and the mesophases of block copolymers may seem weakly connected subjects. However, in this review we bring out some important common features related to the tethering experienced by the polymer chains in all of these structures. Tethered polymer chains, in our parlance, are chains attached to a point, a line, a surface or an interface by their ends. In this view, one may think of the arms of a star polymer as chains tethered to a point [1], or of polymerized macromonomers as chains tethered to a line [2-4]. Adsorption or grafting of end-functionalized polymers to a surface exemplifies a tethered surface layer [5] (a polymer brush ), whereas block copolymers straddling phase boundaries give rise to chains tethered to an interface [6],... 

The distinctive properties of densely tethered chains were first noted by Alexander [7] in 1977. His theoretical analysis concerned the end-adsorption of terminally functionalized polymers on a flat surface. Further elaboration by de Gennes [8] and by Cantor [9] stressed the utility of tethered chains to the description of self-assembled block copolymers. The next important step was taken by Daoud and Cotton [10] in 1982 in a model for star polymers. This model generalizes the... 

Thus, the spacing of the chains relative to the neutral, free, swollen size of the buoy blocks is, for a given chemical system and temperature, a unique function of the solvent-enhanced size asymmetry of the diblock polymer and a weak function of the effective Hamaker constant for adsorption. The degree of crowding of the nonadsorbing blocks, measured by a decrease in the left-hand side of Eq. 28, increases with increasing asymmetry of the block copolymer. 

Machida, S., Nakata, H., Yamada, K and Itaya, A. (2002) Position-selective adsorption of fimctional nanopartides on block copolymer films. Prepr. lUPAC Polym. Confi p. 443. 

Many kinds of nonbiodegradable vinyl-type hydrophilic polymers were also used in combination with aliphatic polyesters to prepare amphiphilic block copolymers. Two typical examples of the vinyl-polymers used are poly(/V-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAAm) [149-152] and poly(2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine) (PMPC) [153]. PNIPAAm is well known as a temperature-responsive polymer and has been used in biomedicine to provide smart materials. Temperature-responsive nanoparticles or polymer micelles could be prepared using PNIPAAm-6-PLA block copolymers [149-152]. PMPC is also a well-known biocompatible polymer that suppresses protein adsorption and platelet adhesion, and has been used as the hydrophilic outer shell of polymer micelles consisting of a block copolymer of PMPC -co-PLA [153]. Many other vinyl-type polymers used for PLA-based amphiphilic block copolymers were also introduced in a recent review [16]. 

PVA Particles. Dispersions were prepared in order to examine stabilization for a core polymer having a glass transition temperature below the dispersion polymerization temperature. PVA particles prepared with a block copolymer having M PS) x 10000 showed a tendency to flocculate at ambient temperature during redispersion cycles to remove excess block copolymer, particularly if the dispersion polymerization had not proceeded to 100 conversion of monomer. It is well documented that on mixing solutions of polystyrene and poly(vinyl acetate) homopolymers phase separation tends to occur (10,11), and solubility studies (12) of PS in n-heptane suggest that PS blocks with Mn(PS) 10000 will be close to dissolution when dispersion polymerizations are performed at 3 +3 K. Consequently, we may postulate that for soft polymer particles the block copolymer is rejected from the particle because of an incompatibility effect and is adsorbed at the particle surface. If the block copolymer desorbs from the particle surface, then particle agglomeration will occur unless rapid adsorption of other copolymer molecules occurs from a reservoir of excess block copolymer. 

In the micellar region the trend to decreasing colloid stability is arrested and a partial improvement, in line with the enhanced level of polymer adsorption, is noted until the conditions for gross phase separation are reached. Only the intermediate block copolymer BC 42 shows indications of discontinuities in behavior at the solvent composition for micelle formation. The results presented here do not show the sharp transition from stability to instability found experimentally (4,8,17) by Napper and generally expected on theoretical grounds. However, there are important differences in experimental methodology that must be emphasised. 

Fig. 9.19 Preparation of polymer brushes on solid surfaces by a) chemical grafting of end-functionalized linear polymers or selective adsorption of asymmetric block copolymers and b) by surface-initiated polymerization (SIP) using initiator functions on the solid surface. The depicted SAM bearing to-functionalities...

FIGURE 16.13 Schematic representation of separation of a block copolymer poly(A)-block-poly(B) from its parent homopolymers poly(A) and poly(B). The elnent promotes free SEC elntion of all distinct constitnents of mixtnre. The LC LCD procednre with two local barriers is applied. Poly(A) is not adsorptive and it is not retained within colnmn by any component of mobile phase and barrier(s). At least one component of barrier(s) promotes adsorption of both the homopolymer poly(B) and the block copolymer that contains poly(B) blocks, (a) Sitnation in the moment of sample introdnction Barrier 1 has been injected as first. It is more efficient and decelerates elntion of block copolymer. After certain time delay, barrier 2 has been introdnced. It exhibits decreased blocking (adsorption promoting) efficacy. Barrier 2 allows the breakthrongh and the SEC elution of block copolymer but it hinders fast elution of more adsorptive homopolymer poly(B). The time delay 1 between sample and barrier 1 determines retention volume of block copolymer while the time delay 2 between sample and barrier 2 controls retention volume of homopolymer poly(B). (b) Situation after about 20 percent of total elution time. The non retained polymer poly(X) elutes as first. It is followed with the block copolymer, later with the adsorptive homopolymer poly(B), and finally with the non retained low-molar-mass or oligomeric admixture. Notice that the peak position has an opposite sign compared to retention time or retention volume Tr. 

As a result of the dependence of universal calibration on column elution behavior (i.e., anomalous behavior due to adsorption or exclusion), the contribution of the polymer core and shell components (33,34) to hydrodynamic behavior must be fully understood if competent analysis of block copolymers and branched heteropolymers is to be made. It is hoped that with the advent of appropriate MW, composition, and branched polymer standards, the limits of fit of universal calibration to biopolymers such as lignin can be judged. 

Surface adsorption site energy and density are very important. Most biomaterial surfaces have very high site densities, making it difficult to study the mechanisms governing adsorption. Low site density surfaces are available. Heterogeneous surfaces, such as block copolymers and polymer blends, may have very unique adsorption properties. If one of the phases or domains tends to dominate the surface, it may act as a homogenous surface. If both phases are present on the surface, then two or more... 

Balazs and Lewandowski (1990) have performed simulations of the adsorption of triblock copolymers onto a planar surface, and examined the conformations of the adsorbed chains. Monte Carlo simulations were performed of the motion of hydrophilic-hydrophobic chains on a cubic lattice. These simulations revealed a complex structure in the interfacial region due to the self-assembly of chains, driven by the solvent-incompatible block, reducing adsorption onto the surface. The influence on the surface coverage of length of the hydrophilic segement, polymer concentration, interaction energy between hydrophilic block and the... 

The adsorption behavior of AB- or ABA-type block copolymers in which block A is polyelectrolytic and block B hydrophobic is very interesting. As expected, these polymers serve as dispersants, micelle-forming agents and surface-active agents. 

SCFT today is one of the most commonly used tools in polymer science. SCFT is based on de Gennes-Edwards description of a polymer molecule as a flexible Gaussian chain combined with the Flory-Huggins "local" treatment of intermolecular interactions. Applications of SCFT include thermodynamics of block copolymers (Bates and Fredrickson, 1999 Matsen and Bates, 1996), adsorption of polymer chains on solid surfaces (Scheutjens and Fleer, 1979,1980), and calculation of interfacial tension in binary polymer blends compatibilized by block copolymers (Lyatskaya et al., 1996), among others. 

---