Block copolymer adsorption

The adsorption of block copolymers can be controlled by different stimuli, in particular by the pH since most of the brushes formed by block copolymers adsorption are polyelectrolyte brushes [129, 130], The group of Armes, for instance, studied the pH-controlled adsorption of a series of block copolymers [131, 132], In the case of copolymers bearing hydrophobic 2-(diethylamino)ethyl methacrylate groups (DEA) and a water-soluble zwiterionic poly(2-methacryloyl phosphoryl-choline) (MPC) block, they showed that at low pH the cationic DEA flatted to the anionic silicon surface while the MPC was in contact with the solution [132], At around neutral pH, micelles were formed in solution and adsorbed onto the surface because the DEA core was still weakly cationic. The MPC block formed the micelle coronas. Nevertheless, at higher pH the micelles became less cationic and the adsorption rate decreased. 

Tiberg, F., Malmsten, M., Linse, P. and Lindman, B., Kinetic and equilibrium aspects of block copolymer adsorption, Langmuir, 1, 2723-2730 (1991). 

Tiberg F, Malmsten M, Linse P, Lindman B. Kinetic and equUibrium aspects of block copolymer adsorption. Langmuir 1991 7 2723-2730. 

Marques C. M., and Joanny, J. F. 1989. Block copolymer adsorption in a nonse-lective solvent. Macromolecules 22 1454—1458. 

Marques, C. M., Joanny, J.-R, Block Copolymer Adsorption in a Nonselective... 

The statistical thermodynamics of block copolymer adsorption was considered elsewhere.Many theories attempt to characterize adsorption by smface density, block segment distribution profile, and the thickness of adsorbed layer. As a rule, an adsorbed diblock copolymer has one block adsorbed on the surface in a rather flat conformation, whereas the other block, having a lower surface activity, forms dangling tails. Because of their freely dangling blocks, adsorbed diblock copolymers are often interpenetrated. The adsorption of block copolymers leads to the segregation of blocks in the adsorption layer. It was found that both kinetic and equilibrium features of the block copolymer adsorption are intimately related to the phase behavior of the block copolymer solution. In particular, a very strong increase in the adsorbed amount is observed when the system approaches the phase boundary. As a consequence, a partial phase separation phenomenon may proceed in the surface zone. 

SanJay Patel, obtained Bachelor. of Technology from Indian Institute of Technology, Kampur, India (1982). Ph.D., under Professor M. Tirrell, University of Minnesota, 1988. Set up the surface forces laboratory at the University, studied homopolyraer and block copolymer adsorption. Currently he is at the AT T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, M.J. 

A very interesting problem is the adsorption of block copolymers at the interface between incompatible homopolymers,which lower the interfacial tension and therefore act as compatibilizing agents in such blends. This phenomenon has been studied theoretically (e.g.. Refs 200-203, 207), experimentally (e.g.. Ref. 206), and by Monte Carlo simulation. In the last work the A, B homopolymers are not included explicitly in the simulation, however, and their existence shows up only indirectly via suitable energy parameters which differ in the A-phase (for z > T/2) from those in the B-phase (for z < Ljl). The A-B interface hence is sharp on the scale of the lattice spacing and treated as strictly localized. Wang et al treat L lattices with lattice sizes up to = 50 and up to 400 chains of composition Na= Nb = ox variable / with N = 10 up to /= 3/4, and discuss the description of the block copolymer adsorption at the A-B interface in terms of Langmuir-type isotherms. 

Highly branched polymers, polymer adsorption and the mesophases of block copolymers may seem weakly connected subjects. However, in this review we bring out some important common features related to the tethering experienced by the polymer chains in all of these structures. Tethered polymer chains, in our parlance, are chains attached to a point, a line, a surface or an interface by their ends. In this view, one may think of the arms of a star polymer as chains tethered to a point [1], or of polymerized macromonomers as chains tethered to a line [2-4]. Adsorption or grafting of end-functionalized polymers to a surface exemplifies a tethered surface layer [5] (a polymer brush ), whereas block copolymers straddling phase boundaries give rise to chains tethered to an interface [6],... 

The distinctive properties of densely tethered chains were first noted by Alexander [7] in 1977. His theoretical analysis concerned the end-adsorption of terminally functionalized polymers on a flat surface. Further elaboration by de Gennes [8] and by Cantor [9] stressed the utility of tethered chains to the description of self-assembled block copolymers. The next important step was taken by Daoud and Cotton [10] in 1982 in a model for star polymers. This model generalizes the... 

AB diblock copolymers in the presence of a selective surface can form an adsorbed layer, which is a planar form of aggregation or self-assembly. This is very useful in the manipulation of the surface properties of solid surfaces, especially those that are employed in liquid media. Several situations have been studied both theoretically and experimentally, among them the case of a selective surface but a nonselective solvent [75] which results in swelling of both the anchor and the buoy layers. However, we concentrate on the situation most closely related to the micelle conditions just discussed, namely, adsorption from a selective solvent. Our theoretical discussion is adapted and abbreviated from that of Marques et al. [76], who considered many features not discussed here. They began their analysis from the grand canonical free energy of a block copolymer layer in equilibrium with a reservoir containing soluble block copolymer at chemical potential peK. They also considered the possible effects of micellization in solution on the adsorption process [61]. We assume in this presentation that the anchor layer is in a solvent-free, melt state above Tg. The anchor layer is assumed to be thin and smooth, with a sharp interface between it and the solvent swollen buoy layer. 

Thus, the spacing of the chains relative to the neutral, free, swollen size of the buoy blocks is, for a given chemical system and temperature, a unique function of the solvent-enhanced size asymmetry of the diblock polymer and a weak function of the effective Hamaker constant for adsorption. The degree of crowding of the nonadsorbing blocks, measured by a decrease in the left-hand side of Eq. 28, increases with increasing asymmetry of the block copolymer. 

Figure 7 shows the results of measurements of adsorption density by Parsonage, etal. [77] on a series of eighteen block copolymers, with poly(2-vinylpyridine) [PVP] anchors and polystyrene [PS] buoys, adsorbed from toluene (selective for PS) of variable molecular weight in each block. The results are presented as the reciprocal square of Eq. 28, that is, as a dimensionless number density of chains ct (d/Rg A)-2. For all but the copolymers of highest asymmetry, Eq. 28 is in good agreement with the data of Fig. 7. The high asymmetry copolymers are in the regime of the data of curves (a) and (c) of Fig. 3 where the large relative size...

Fig. 7. Data of Parsonage et al. [77] on the adsorption of a series of block copolymers of polystyrene-poly-2-vinylpyridine. The ordinate is the measured surface density ( d 2) reduced by the density required for the nonadsorbing chains to overlap the abscissa is the solvent-enhanced size asymmetry of the block copolymer defined under Eq. 26. The form of this plot is that suggested by Eq. 28...

NR, styrene-butadiene mbber (SBR), polybutadiene rubber, nitrile mbber, acrylic copolymer, ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymer, and A-B-A type block copolymer with conjugated dienes have been used to prepare pressure-sensitive adhesives by EB radiation [116-126]. It is not necessary to heat up the sample to join the elastomeric joints. This has only been possible due to cross-linking procedure by EB irradiation [127]. Polyfunctional acrylates, tackifier resin, and other additives have also been used to improve adhesive properties. Sasaki et al. [128] have studied the EB radiation-curable pressure-sensitive adhesives from dimer acid-based polyester urethane diacrylate with various methacrylate monomers. Acrylamide has been polymerized in the intercalation space of montmorillonite using an EB. The polymerization condition has been studied using a statistical method. The product shows a good water adsorption and retention capacity [129]. 

Machida, S., Nakata, H., Yamada, K and Itaya, A. (2002) Position-selective adsorption of fimctional nanopartides on block copolymer films. Prepr. lUPAC Polym. Confi p. 443. 

Many kinds of nonbiodegradable vinyl-type hydrophilic polymers were also used in combination with aliphatic polyesters to prepare amphiphilic block copolymers. Two typical examples of the vinyl-polymers used are poly(/V-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAAm) [149-152] and poly(2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine) (PMPC) [153]. PNIPAAm is well known as a temperature-responsive polymer and has been used in biomedicine to provide smart materials. Temperature-responsive nanoparticles or polymer micelles could be prepared using PNIPAAm-6-PLA block copolymers [149-152]. PMPC is also a well-known biocompatible polymer that suppresses protein adsorption and platelet adhesion, and has been used as the hydrophilic outer shell of polymer micelles consisting of a block copolymer of PMPC -co-PLA [153]. Many other vinyl-type polymers used for PLA-based amphiphilic block copolymers were also introduced in a recent review [16]. 

PVA Particles. Dispersions were prepared in order to examine stabilization for a core polymer having a glass transition temperature below the dispersion polymerization temperature. PVA particles prepared with a block copolymer having M PS) x 10000 showed a tendency to flocculate at ambient temperature during redispersion cycles to remove excess block copolymer, particularly if the dispersion polymerization had not proceeded to 100 conversion of monomer. It is well documented that on mixing solutions of polystyrene and poly(vinyl acetate) homopolymers phase separation tends to occur (10,11), and solubility studies (12) of PS in n-heptane suggest that PS blocks with Mn(PS) 10000 will be close to dissolution when dispersion polymerizations are performed at 3 +3 K. Consequently, we may postulate that for soft polymer particles the block copolymer is rejected from the particle because of an incompatibility effect and is adsorbed at the particle surface. If the block copolymer desorbs from the particle surface, then particle agglomeration will occur unless rapid adsorption of other copolymer molecules occurs from a reservoir of excess block copolymer. 

The adsorption of block and random copolymers of styrene and methyl methacrylate on to silica from their solutions in carbon tetrachloride/n-heptane, and the resulting dispersion stability, has been investigated. Theta-conditions for the homopolymers and analogous critical non-solvent volume fractions for random copolymers were determined by cloud-point titration. The adsorption of block copolymers varied steadily with the non-solvent content, whilst that of the random copolymers became progressively more dependent on solvent quality only as theta-conditions and phase separation were approached. 

In the micellar region the trend to decreasing colloid stability is arrested and a partial improvement, in line with the enhanced level of polymer adsorption, is noted until the conditions for gross phase separation are reached. Only the intermediate block copolymer BC 42 shows indications of discontinuities in behavior at the solvent composition for micelle formation. The results presented here do not show the sharp transition from stability to instability found experimentally (4,8,17) by Napper and generally expected on theoretical grounds. However, there are important differences in experimental methodology that must be emphasised. 

Figure 9.3. Characterization of mesoporous Ti02 films templated by Pluronics block copolymers using diverse characterization techniques XRD pattern (a), transmission electron microscope (TEM) image (b), dark-field TEM image (c), and isotherms of Kr adsorption (d).The Pluronic-templated Ti02 films were calcined at 400°C (solid points) and 600°C (open points). The films were prepared according to Alberius et al. (Ref. 14).

Figure 1.6 Top Low-temperature nitrogen adsorption ( ) and desorption (x) isotherms measured on a calcined SBA-15 mesoporous silica solid prepared using an EO20PO70EO20 block copolymer [54]. Bottom Pore size distribution derived from the adsorption isotherm reported at the top [54]. A high surface area (850 m2/g), a uniform distribution of cylindrical nanopores (diameter —90 A), and a large pore volume (1.17 cm3/g) were all estimated from these data. These properties make this material suitable for use as support in the preparation of high-surface-area solid catalysts. (Reproduced with permission from The American Chemical Society.)...

This work was important for several reasons in addition to the original demonstration of the methodology for generating porous films from ordered block copolymer precursors. Demonstrating porosity necessitates more than just microscopy. The complementary N2 adsorption, gravimetric, spectro-... 

Fig. 9.19 Preparation of polymer brushes on solid surfaces by a) chemical grafting of end-functionalized linear polymers or selective adsorption of asymmetric block copolymers and b) by surface-initiated polymerization (SIP) using initiator functions on the solid surface. The depicted SAM bearing to-functionalities...

---