Films, adsorbed

It should be noted that here, as with capillary rise, there is an adsorbed film of vapor (see Section X-6D) with which the meniscus merges smoothly. The meniscus is not hanging from the plate but rather fiom a liquidlike film [53]. The correction for the weight of such film should be negligible, however. 

A quite different means for the experimental determination of surface excess quantities is ellipsometry. The technique is discussed in Section IV-3D, and it is sufficient to note here that the method allows the calculation of the thickness of an adsorbed film from the ellipticity produced in light reflected from the film covered surface. If this thickness, t, is known, F may be calculated from the relationship F = t/V, where V is the molecular volume. This last may be estimated either from molecular models or from the bulk liquid density. 

It was pointed out at the beginning of this section that ir could be viewed as arising from an osmotic pressure difference between a surface region comprising an adsorbed film and that of the pure solvent. It is instructive to develop... 

The succeeding material is broadly organized according to the types of experimental quantities measured because much of the literature is so grouped. In the next chapter spread monolayers are discussed, and in later chapters the topics of adsorption from solution and of gas adsorption are considered. Irrespective of the experimental compartmentation, the conclusions as to the nature of mobile adsorbed films, that is, their structure and equations of state, will tend to be of a general validity. Thus, only a limited discussion of Gibbs monolayers has been given here, and none of such related aspects as the contact potentials of solutions or of adsorption at liquid-liquid interfaces, as it is more efficient to treat these topics later. 

Calculate the vapor pressure of water when present in a capillary of 0.1 m radius (assume zero contact angle). Express your result as percent change from the normal value at 25°C. Suppose now that the effective radius of the capillary is reduced because of the presence of an adsorbed film of water 100 A thick. Show what the percent reduction in vapor pressure should now be. 

A 1.5% by weight aqueous surfactant solution has a surface tension of 53.8 dyn/cm (or mN/m) at 20°C. (a) Calculate a, the area of surface containing one molecule. State any assumptions that must be made to make the calculation from the preceding data, (b) The additional information is now supplied that a 1.7% solution has a surface tension of 53.6 dyn/cm. If the surface-adsorbed film obeys the equation of state ir(o - 00) = kT, calculate from the combined data a value of 00, the actual area of a molecule. 

Derive the equation of state, that is, the relationship between t and a, of the adsorbed film for the case of a surface active electrolyte. Assume that the activity coefficient for the electrolyte is unity, that the solution is dilute enough so that surface tension is a linear function of the concentration of the electrolyte, and that the electrolyte itself (and not some hydrolyzed form) is the surface-adsorbed species. Do this for the case of a strong 1 1 electrolyte and a strong 1 3 electrolyte. 

This rule is approximately obeyed by a large number of systems, although there are many exceptions see Refs. 15-18. The rule can be understood in terms of a simple physical picture. There should be an adsorbed film of substance B on the surface of liquid A. If we regard this film to be thick enough to have the properties of bulk liquid B, then 7a(B) is effectively the interfacial tension of a duplex surface and should be equal to 7ab + VB(A)- Equation IV-6 then follows. See also Refs. 14 and 18. 

ELL Ellipsometry [194, 195] Depolarization of reflected Thickness of adsorbed film... 

Equations X-12 and X-13 thus provide a thermodynamic evaluation of the change in interfacial free energy accompanying adsorption. As discussed further in Section X-5C, typical values of v for adsorbed films on solids range up to 100 ergs/cm. ... 

A heat of immersion may refer to the immersion of a clean solid surface, qs.imm. or to the immersion of a solid having an adsorbed film on the surface. If the immersion of this last is into liquid adsorbate, we then report qsv.imm if tbe adsorbed film is in equilibrium with the saturated vapor pressure of the adsorbate (i.e., the vapor pressure of the liquid adsorbate P ), we will write It follows from these definitions... 

It is important to keep in mind that the phases are mutually in equilibrium. In particular, the designation is a reminder that the solid surface must be in equilibrium with the saturated vapor pressure and that there must therefore be an adsorbed film of film pressure (see Section X-3B). Thus... 

Values for x , the film pressure of the adsorbed film of the vapor (of the liquid whose contact angle is measured), are scarce. Vapor phase adsorption data, required by Eq. X-13, cannot be obtained in this case by the usual volumetric method (see Chapter... 

An interesting question that arises is what happens when a thick adsorbed film (such as reported at for various liquids on glass [144] and for water on pyrolytic carbon [135]) is layered over with bulk liquid. That is, if the solid is immersed in the liquid adsorbate, is the same distinct and relatively thick interfacial film still present, forming some kind of discontinuity or interface with bulk liquid, or is there now a smooth gradation in properties from the surface to the bulk region This type of question seems not to have been studied, although the answer should be of importance in fluid flow problems and in formulating better models for adsorption phenomena from solution (see Section XI-1). 

The microscopic contour of a meniscus or a drop is a matter that presents some mathematical problems even with the simplifying assumption of a uniform, rigid solid. Since bulk liquid is present, the system must be in equilibrium with the local vapor pressure so that an equilibrium adsorbed film must also be present. The likely picture for the case of a nonwetting drop on a flat surface is... 

Fig. X-16. (a) Microscopic appearance of the three-phase contact region, (b) Wetting meniscus against a vertical plate showing the meniscus only, adsorbed film only, and joined profile. (From Ref. 226 with permission. Copyright 1980 American Chemical Society.)...

Electrolyte adsorption on metals is important in electrochemistry [167,168]. One study reports the adsorption of various anions an Ag, Au, Rh, and Ni electrodes using ellipsometry. Adsorbed film thicknesses now also depend on applied potential. 

Surface heterogeneity may be inferred from emission studies such as those studies by de Schrijver and co-workers on P and on R adsorbed on clay minerals [197,198]. In the case of adsorbed pyrene and its derivatives, there is considerable evidence for surface mobility (on clays, metal oxides, sulfides), as from the work of Thomas [199], de Mayo and co-workers [200], Singer [201] and Stahlberg et al. [202]. There has also been evidence for ground-state bimolecular association of adsorbed pyrene [66,203]. The sensitivity of pyrene to the polarity of its environment allows its use as a probe of surface polarity [204,205]. Pyrene or ofter emitters may be used as probes to study the structure of an adsorbate film, as in the case of Triton X-100 on silica [206], sodium dodecyl sulfate at the alumina surface [207] and hexadecyltrimethylammonium chloride adsorbed onto silver electrodes from water and dimethylformamide [208]. In all cases progressive structural changes were concluded to occur with increasing surfactant adsorption. 

An adsorbed film obeys a modified Amagat equation of state, t(t = qkT (see Eq. ni-107). Show that this corresponds to a Freundlich adsorption isotherm (Eq. XI-12) and comment on the situation. 

Much of the classic work with boundary lubrication was carried out by Sir William Hardy [44,45]. He showed that boundary lubrication could be explained in terms of adsorbed films of lubricants and proposed that the hydrocarbon surfaces of such films reduced the fields of force between the two parts. 

Hardy s explanation that the small coefficients of friction observed under boundary lubrication conditions were due to the reduction in the force fields between the surfaces as a result of adsorbed films is undoubtedly correct in a general way. The explanation leaves much to be desired, however, and it is of interest to consider more detailed proposals as to the mechanism of boundary lubrication. 

The Washburn equation has most recently been confirmed for water and cyclohexane in glass capillaries ranging from 0.3 to 400 fim in radii [46]. The contact angle formed by a moving meniscus may differ, however, from the static one [46, 47]. Good and Lin [48] found a difference in penetration rate between an outgassed capillary and one with a vapor adsorbed film, and they propose that the driving force be modified by a film pressure term. 

Fuerstenau and Healy [100] and to Gaudin and Fuerstenau [101] that some type of near phase transition can occur in the adsorbed film of surfactant. They proposed, in fact, that surface micelle formation set in, reminiscent of Langmuir s explanation of intermediate type film on liquid substrates (Section IV-6). 

Although it is hard to draw a sharp distinction, emulsions and foams are somewhat different from systems normally referred to as colloidal. Thus, whereas ordinary cream is an oil-in-water emulsion, the very fine aqueous suspension of oil droplets that results from the condensation of oily steam is essentially colloidal and is called an oil hydrosol. In this case the oil occupies only a small fraction of the volume of the system, and the particles of oil are small enough that their natural sedimentation rate is so slow that even small thermal convection currents suffice to keep them suspended for a cream, on the other hand, as also is the case for foams, the inner phase constitutes a sizable fraction of the total volume, and the system consists of a network of interfaces that are prevented from collapsing or coalescing by virtue of adsorbed films or electrical repulsions. 

The energetics and kinetics of film formation appear to be especially important when two or more solutes are present, since now the matter of monolayer penetration or complex formation enters the picture (see Section IV-7). Schul-man and co-workers [77, 78], in particular, noted that especially stable emulsions result when the adsorbed film of surfactant material forms strong penetration complexes with a species present in the oil phase. The stabilizing effect of such mixed films may lie in their slow desorption or elevated viscosity. The dynamic effects of surfactant transport have been investigated by Shah and coworkers [22] who show the correlation between micellar lifetime and droplet size. More stable micelles are unable to rapidly transport surfactant from the bulk to the surface, and hence they support emulsions containing larger droplets. 

An important aspect of the stabilization of emulsions by adsorbed films is that of the role played by the film in resisting the coalescence of two droplets of inner phase. Such coalescence involves a local mechanical compression at the point of encounter that would be resisted (much as in the approach of two boundary lubricated surfaces discussed in Section XII-7B) and then, if coalescence is to occur, the discharge from the surface region of some of the surfactant material. 

This difference looks large enough to be diagnostic of the state of the adsorbed film. However, to be consistent with the kinetic derivation of the Langmuir equation, it was necessary to suppose that the site acted as a potential box and, furthermore, that a weak adsorption bond of ifi corresponding to 1 /tq was present. With these provisions we obtain... 

Thus the entropy of localized adsorption can range widely, depending on whether the site is viewed as equivalent to a strong adsorption bond of negligible entropy or as a potential box plus a weak bond (see Ref. 12). In addition, estimates of AS ds should include possible surface vibrational contributions in the case of mobile adsorption, and all calculations are faced with possible contributions from a loss in rotational entropy on adsorption as well as from change in the adsorbent structure following adsorption (see Section XVI-4B). These uncertainties make it virtually impossible to affirm what the state of an adsorbed film is from entropy measurements alone for this, additional independent information about surface mobility and vibrational surface states is needed. (However, see Ref. 15 for a somewhat more optimistic conclusion.)... 

Isotherms Based on the Equation of State of the Adsorbed Film... 

Where Pg is the pressure of vapor in equilibrium with the adsorbed film. The characteristic curve is now just PF In Pq/P versus x (or against [Pg.627]

The first term on the right is the common inverse cube law, the second is taken to be the empirically more important form for moderate film thickness (and also conforms to the polarization model, Section XVII-7C), and the last term allows for structural perturbation in the adsorbed film relative to bulk liquid adsorbate. In effect, the vapor pressure of a thin multilayer film is taken to be P and to relax toward P as the film thickens. The equation has been useful in relating adsorption isotherms to contact angle behavior (see Section X-7). Roy and Halsey [73] have used a similar equation earlier, Halsey [74] allowed for surface heterogeneity by assuming a distribution of Uq values in Eq. XVII-79. Dubinin s equation (Eq. XVII-75) has been mentioned another variant has been used by Bonnetain and co-workers [7S]. 

The characteristic isotherm concept was elaborated by de Boer and coworkers [90]. By accepting a reference from a BET fit to a standard system and assuming a density for the adsorbed film, one may convert n/rim to film thickness t. The characteristic isotherm for a given adsorbate may then be plotted as t versus P/P. For any new system, one reads t from the standard r-curve and n from the new isotherm, for various P/P values. De Boer and co-work-ers t values are given in Table XVII-4. A plot of t versus n should be linear if the experimental isotherm has the same shape as the reference characteristic isotherm, and the slope gives E ... 

There are alternative ways of defining the various thermodynamic quantities. One may, for example, treat the adsorbed film as a phase having volume, so that P, V terms enter into the definitions. A systematic treatment of this type has been given by Honig [116], who also points out some additional types of heat of adsorption. 

Brunauer (see Refs. 136-138) defended these defects as deliberate approximations needed to obtain a practical two-constant equation. The assumption of a constant heat of adsorption in the first layer represents a balance between the effects of surface heterogeneity and of lateral interaction, and the assumption of a constant instead of a decreasing heat of adsorption for the succeeding layers balances the overestimate of the entropy of adsorption. These comments do help to explain why the model works as well as it does. However, since these approximations are inherent in the treatment, one can see why the BET model does not lend itself readily to any detailed insight into the real physical nature of multilayers. In summary, the BET equation will undoubtedly maintain its usefulness in surface area determinations, and it does provide some physical information about the nature of the adsorbed film, but only at the level of approximation inherent in the model. Mainly, the c value provides an estimate of the first layer heat of adsorption, averaged over the region of fit. 

---