Adjusted analyses

C + Tumors found in treated groups may reflect longer survival of treated groups. Time adjusted analysis is indicated. 

D + Apparent negative findings on tumors may be due to the shorter survival in treated groups. Time adjusted analysis and/or a retest at lower doses is indicated. 

G 0 + High mortality in treated groups may lead to unadjusted test missing a possible tumorigen. Adjusted analysis and/or retest at lower doses is indicated... 

We will say quite a bit later, in the chapter on adjusted analysis and analysis of covariance (Chapter 6) about additional improvements to this kind of analysis that increase sensitivity further and also avoid the so-called potential problem of regression towards the mean. For the moment though, it is test 3 that is the best way to compare the treatments. 

Should treatment-by-covariate interactions be found, either through a test of homogeneity in an adjusted analysis or through ANCOVA, then analysis usually proceeds by looking at treatment differences within subgroups. Plots of treatment effects with associated confidence intervals within these subgroups are useful in this regard. 

One disadvantage of ANCOVA is that the modelling does involve a number of assumptions and if those assumptions are not valid then the approach could mislead. For example, it is assumed (usually) that the covariates affect outcome in a linear way there is invariably too little information in the data to be able to assess this assumption in any effective way. In contrast, with an adjusted analysis, assumptions about the way in which covariates affect outcome are not made and in that sense it can be seen as a more robust approach. In some regulatory circles adjusted analyses are preferred to ANCOVA for these reasons. 

In gas analysis the burettes are generally vertical graduated tubes provided with a tap at the upper end. The lower end is connected by means of tubing to a reservoir containing mercury or water, by means of which the pressure on the gas enclosed between the tap and the liquid surface may be adjusted and ascertained. 

Analysis The central ring has the electron-withdrawing substituents so all we have to do is to adjust the oxidation level ... 

Procedure. Select a volume of sample requiring less than 15 mL of titrant to keep the analysis time under 5 min and, if necessary, dilute the sample to 50 mL with distilled water. Adjust the pH by adding 1-2 mL of a pH 10 buffer containing a small amount of Mg +-EDTA. Add 1-2 drops of indicator, and titrate with a standard solution of EDTA until the red-to-blue end point is reached. 

Inorganic Analysis Complexation titrimetry continues to be listed as a standard method for the determination of hardness, Ca +, CN , and Ch in water and waste-water analysis. The evaluation of hardness was described earlier in Method 9.2. The determination of Ca + is complicated by the presence of Mg +, which also reacts with EDTA. To prevent an interference from Mg +, the pH is adjusted to 12-13, precipitating any Mg + as Mg(OH)2. Titrating with EDTA using murexide or Eri-ochrome Blue Black R as a visual indicator gives the concentration of Ca +. 

Sensitivity Sensitivity in flame atomic emission is strongly influenced by the temperature of the excitation source and the composition of the sample matrix. Normally, sensitivity is optimized by aspirating a standard solution and adjusting the flame s composition and the height from which emission is monitored until the emission intensity is maximized. Chemical interferences, when present, decrease the sensitivity of the analysis. With plasma emission, sensitivity is less influenced by the sample matrix. In some cases, for example, a plasma calibration curve prepared using standards in a matrix of distilled water can be used for samples with more complex matrices. 

Selectivity Because it combines separation with analysis, gas chromatography provides excellent selectivity. By adjusting conditions it is usually possible to design a separation such that the analytes elute by themselves. Additional selectivity can be provided by using a detector, such as the electron capture detector, that does not respond to all compounds. 

Selectivity The analysis of closely related compounds, as we have seen in earlier chapters, is often complicated by their tendency to interfere with one another. To overcome this problem, the analyte and interferent must first be separated. An advantage of chemical kinetic methods is that conditions can often be adjusted so that the analyte and interferent have different reaction rates. If the difference in rates is large enough, one species may react completely before the other species has a chance to react. For example, many enzymes selectively cat-... 

The method described here is impractical when the simultaneous analysis of both A and B is desired. The difficulty in this case is that conditions favoring the analysis of A generally do not favor the analysis of B. For example, if conditions are adjusted such that 99% of A reacts in 5 s, then B must reach 99% completion in either 0.01 s if it has the faster kinetics or 2300 s if it has the slower kinetics. 

After the skimmer, the ions must be prepared for mass analysis, and electronic lenses in front of the analyzer are used to adjust ion velocities and flight paths. The skimmer can be considered to be the end of the interface region stretching from the end of the plasma flame. Some sort of light stop must be used to prevent emitted light from the plasma reaching the ion collector in the mass analyzer (Figure 14.2). 

---