Action level decision criteria

Decisions Made by the NIOSH Action Level Criteria. Figure 3 shows the decision contours for the NIOSH Action Level Decision Criteria, and Table I summarizes the decision probabilities for each of the nine sample workplaces. Recall from Equation A-19 that the AL is computed from GSD to provide 95% confidence that no more than 5% of the daily exposures exceed the standard if one randomly collected sample is less than the AL. In terms of the variables used in this paper, (e > 0.05 with p > 0.05 if X > AL). 

In Table I, the NIOSH decision criteria is shown to have poor efficiency by the three dirty workplaces for which e = 0.6. In these cases, a worker would be exposed above the standard three days out of five, and his long-term average exposure would be greater than the 8-hour PEL. Very few people would disagree with the decision to call these workplaces NOT OK. Nevertheless, these workplaces will be declared NOT OK bv the NIOSH Action Level decision criteria only about 60% of the time. This inefficiency is further illustrated by the fact that only one of the three average workplaces with e = 0.2 has P( ) < 0.75. That one is (0.2, 1.13) and it also illustrates the conservativeness of the NIOSH criteria since on those infrequent occasions when a decision is made, the odds are 21 to 1 to decide NOT OK. However, Table I most clearly illustrates the conservativeness of the NIOSH criteria by the fact that P(0K) < 0.1 for the three clean workplaces where e = 0.024. 

What is the criterion that determines whether a decontamination procedure was effective It is not the absolute absence of any chemical contaminants in the equipment blank. Important for the project are only the contaminants of concern and their concentrations. For site investigations, when no information is available on existing pollutants, it may be important that no contaminants of concern are present in equipment blank samples above the laboratory PQLs. On the other hand, for site remediation projects, the presence of contaminants of concern in equipment blank samples may be acceptable, if these concentrations are only a fraction of the action levels. The decision to decontaminate equipment and the selection of the acceptability criteria for equipment blanks are made in the DQO process based on the intended use of the data. 

The level of AChE in the presynaptic and postsynaptic element is not in itself a decisive criterion of cholinergic transmission. A high content of AChE has been observed in many non-cholinergic neurons (see Hebb in ref. 16). On the other hand, cholinergic synapses have been described where no cholinesterases are detectable and the cessation of the ACh action is ensured by other mechanisms (see also Saccharov and Turpaev, ref. 18). 

A major factor affecting the quality of the final result is the suitability of the analytical method applied. Ensuring that the method is fit for purpose can be considered a basic quality control criterion. It is important that laboratories restrict their choice of methods to those that have been characterized as suitable for the matrix and analyte of interest, and at the level of interest. In the EU, and in many other countries and regions, the regulatory limit for authorized veterinary medicinal products is the maximum residue limit (MRL), and for contaminants the maximum permitted limit. Eor prohibited or unauthorized analytes, there is often a threshold or action limit set in Europe, for example, the appropriate regulatory limit is the minimum required performance limit (MRPL) or the reference point for action (RPA), as defined in Article 4 of Commission Decision 2002/657/EC, Article 2 of Commission Decision 2005/34/EC, and Articles 18 and 19 of Council Regulation (EEC) 470/2009.2 ... 

Decision criteria relates to the safety critical deterioration level. It is necessary to determine this level to be able to make appropriate decisions regarding further action. Usually a first basic intervention level is defined according to relevant codes, standards or internal company requirements. A minimum required wall thickness is usually determined due to a stress criterion and depends on allowable stress, design pressure, pipe dimensions and material strength. When deterioration beyond this basic intervention level is revealed through inspection, further actions must he decided. When the basic intervention level is reached, there may... 

---