Accuracy, classical analytical methods

A reasonable thermokinetic evaluation is possible only if it has been ensured with the help of other techniques that reactions running parallel to the desired one are of absolutely mirwr importance only. In practical terms this requirements means that it has to be ensured with the aid of e.g. classical analytical methods that within the evaluated interval the process of interest can be described in terms of a mass balance with sufficient accuracy with a single gross conversion equation. 

Caffeine is often present in pharmaceutical preparations in combination with other drugs, such as acetyl salicylic acid, phenacetin,antipyrin, etc. Because classical analytical techniques (e.g. spectrophotometric and colourimetric methods) can be quite time consuming and leave much to be desired in accuracy and precision, gas chromatography has been quite extensively applied for the analysis of such multicomponent preparations. 

A very important observation at this point is that an IDMS assay is in principle a physical measurement since it is a measurement of ratio of isotopes and not of a ratio of elements (as in classical analytical chemistry). Indeed two numbers of atoms are compared in a ratio determination and these atoms belong to the same element. Hence ail the chemical interferences, normal in a chemical assay, do not affect the result anymore. Combined with the fact that the requirement of being quantitative - essential and difficult in classical chemistry assay - must not be fulfilled (after spiking), this means that IDMS ranks higher in the hierarchy of methods than normal elemental assay methods since it is far less subject to potential chemical error sources. In other words its inherent potential for good precision and accuracy (i.e. small overall uncertainty) and - at least as important -the transparency of the uncertainty propagation in (Eqs. 4 and 5) give it the character of what some have called a "reference method" or even a definitive method". 

When developing a new analytical method or apparatus, and after having evaluated all its critical points, the analyst has to prove the accuracy of the results obtained. Usually the results will be compared with those obtained with a classical method, which implies that the latter is fully under control in the laboratory. However, some critical factors such as the influence of laboratory contamination cannot be resolved in the laboratory itself and have to be investigated externally (through participation in interlaboratory studies as mentioned earlier). This... 

The study of the interfacial phenomena between the channel wall and the colloidal suspension under study in sedimentation field-flow fractionation (SdFFF) is of great significance in investigating the resolution of the SdFFF separation method and its accuracy in determining particles physicochemical quantities. The particle-wall interactions in SdFFF affect the exponential transversal distribution of the analyte and the parabolic flow profile, leading to deviations from the classical retention theory, thus influencing the accuracy of analyte quantities measured by SdFFF. Among the various particle-wall interactions, our discussion focuses on the van der Waals attractive and electrostatic repulsion forces, which play dominant roles in SdFFF surface phenomena. 

Today, sample preparation is maybe the step that most influences the accuracy of the whole analytic method, with the extraction of pesticide residues from environmental matrices the key factor for achieving it. There is no question that in the first decade of the century, SPE technique [72] is the most employed alternative to the classical solid-liquid [13] and liquid-liquid [14] extractions. These classical techniques present multiple disadvantages such as the low recovery of polar pesticides and transformation products (in the case of liquid-liquid extractions) and use of large volumes of solvents. Furthermore, several variants emerged based on the SPE technique solid-phase microextraction (SPME) [72-74], in-tube solid-phase microextraction [72,75,76], matrix solid-phase dispersion [72,77,78], and stir-bar sorptive extraction [72,79]. 

The best method or the most suitable combination of methods can be discussed only in regard to the actual analytical problem. The ideal method for polymer analysis in an industrial environment is often essentially that practical one which identifies and quantitates the desired components at the lowest acceptable total cost for the customer, compatible with the desired accuracy and time constraints. Three examples may illustrate the necessary pragmatic trade-off. Despite being old methods, classical polymer/additive analysis techniques, based on initial additive separation from the polymer matrix through solvent extraction methods followed by preconcentration, still enjoy great popularity. This... 

The analytical sensitivity of classical polarographic or voltammetric methods is usually quite good at about 5 x 10 mol dm . At the lowest concentrations of analyte, however, the currents caused by double-layer effects or other non-faradaic sources causes the accuracy to be unacceptably low. Pulse methods were first developed in the 1950s to improve the sensitivity of the polarographic measurements made by pharmaceutical companies. At present, two pulse methods dominate the analytical field, i.e. normal pulse and differential pulse . Square-wave methods are also growing steadily in popularity. 

Especially when calibrated with standard compounds relative to the classical shake-flask method, rp-HPLC is the method of choice for the experimental determination of partition coefficients. The liability to large variation in measured log for the highly lipophilic compounds (log > 5) subjects the experimental data to major uncertainties and for such molecules calculation is generally preferable (Taylor, 1990). Reported log P >1 (e.g. for some chlorinated dioxins up to 11), corresponding to concentration differences between the aqueous and the 1-octanol phase of about 10 and more are not exact values, but reflect the accuracy of the experimental analytical techniques used they may be subject to major uncertainties of 2 log units. The respective data have to be treated with great caution in QS AR studies, because at best they indicate the order of magnitude of the compounds lipophilicity. 

In an original PCR analysis, for example, only the spectra are taken into account for the determination of the PC scores. For PLS the analyte concentrations of the calibration samples are also incorporated. The factors are presented in such a way that the variation of the content substances can be clarified, as well as possible, by the PCs which are to be determined. Calibration by means of PLS therefore requires, under normal circumstances, fewer factors than a PCR calibration. However, PLS does have its limitations. For example, this approach is often times not appropriate for screening factors that have a minimum effect on the response. Calculations in PLS are generally slower than most classical methods, especially PLS-1. PLS-2 calibrates for all constituents simultaneously, thus allowing for possible sacrificing of accuracy in the predictions of the constituent concentrations. This is especially true for mixtures. In addition, a large number of samples are normally required for accurate calibration. 

---