Acceptance criteria revision

There may be situations during sample analysis in which the LLOQ or the ULOQ standard point is removed due to a technical error or other a priori determined acceptance criterion. The practical outcome is a truncated standard curve, that is, in the case where the LLOQ standard is revised, then the next highest level standard becomes the LLOQ for this ran. This revised standard curve should then be used in the evaluation of the study samples from that particular run, rejecting (for repeat analysis) any study samples read below the new LLOQ. In general, the study samples that fall between the revised LLOQ and the original assay LLOQ are repeated in a separate run to avoid having samples reported against two LLOQ values in the... 

The acceptance criterion for the resolution of GSI 119.1 is that the piping design shall be in accordance with those recommendations of the PRC which have been implemented by the NRC (GDC 4 and the Standard Review Plan revisions). SRP Section 3.6.2 eliminates the requirement to postulate arbitrary intermediate breaks. In addition, SRP Section 3.6.3, which is currently in draft form, implements the "broad scope" rule of GDC 4 and endorses the LBB methodology contained in NUREG-1061 Volume 3 (Reference 2). 

The acceptance criterion for the resolution of USI A-40 is that future nuclear power plants shall conform to the seismic design acceptance criteria and guidance of Revision 2 to SRP Sections 2.5.2, 3.7.1, 3.7.2, and 3.7.3. 

The acceptance criterion for the resolution of GSI B-63 is that the periodic inservice testing of the HP to LP system boundary valves shall meet the intent of SRP 3.9.6, Revision 2. Because SRP 3.9.6, Revision 2, endorses the requirements of the ASME B PV Code Section XI, periodic testing of these valves shall be performed in accordance with the code. 

There is no rigid definition of what constitutes a suitable synthesis. The major criterion by which syntheses are judged is the potential value to the scientific community. An ideal synthesis is one which presents a new or revised experimental procedure applicable to a variety of related compounds, at least one of which is critically important in current research. However, syntheses of individual compounds that are of interest or importance are also acceptable. 

The structure of ROD is documented in Attachment 3 of ROSI III.l (Reference 3). Revision 5 of ROSI III.l reflects the current ROD organization and addresses the responsibilities and authorities of all ROD personnel and their interfaces with support groups. Based on the above, the criterion for the operating contractor to provide administrative procedures that document the structure of the reactor operations organization, including job descriptions, authorities, responsibilities, and interfaces with support groups is acceptably satisfied. 

WSRC has committed to evaluating the six additional accidents specified in this restart criterion. The general guidance that WSRC is using to evaluate the accidents includes development of a detailed justification for the accident scenarios to be reviewed, why other accident combinations Will not be evaluated, a determination of the expected frequency of the new scenarios, and issuance of an RTR (or other document) that documents the evaluation. The -staff understands that the evaluation of the new design basis events will be> documented prior to restart in formal reports, and that the actual revision of SAR Chapter 15 will be performed after restart. The action items list is weSk for ISA recommendation 7.4.7 in that it does not include an action item to assess the adequacy of the plant response to these events and to determine if any improvements are needed. This must be acceptably addressed in order to-satisfy this criterion. 

---