Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Zero sulfur content

There is a need to seek an environmentally benign, technically feasible and economical alternative fuel because of the limited crude oil reserves and serious pollution all over the world. Recently, dimethyl ether (DME) is proved to be used as an alternative clean fuel in transportation, power generation and household use for its excellent behavior in compression ignition for combustion, cetane number of over 55 and zero sulfur content, and is praised as a super-clean fuel in the 21 century. It has a promising foreground of application. Therefore, the efficient synthesis of DME from syngas derived from natural gas, coal or biomass has drawn much attention. [Pg.489]

By 2010, Tier 2 standards should further reduce vehicle emissions by extending regulations to larger SUVs and passenger vans. The use of gasoline with a lower sulfur content will also reduce emissions and it also makes it easier to build cars that can achieve further reductions. These standards should allow new U.S. cars to be extremely free of air pollutants. But, the Clean Air Act does not cover vehicle C02 emissions. Many new cars are called near zero emissions by their manufacturers and may have tailpipe emissions cleaner than some urban air. Hydrogen fuel cell vehicles will have almost no emissions besides some water vapor and would be much cleaner. [Pg.287]

Bonzel and Ku performed a detailed study on the influence of sulfur on the adsorption of CO (208) as well as on the catalytic C02 formation (209) on a Pt(lll) surface. It was found that preadsorbed sulfur affected both the adsorption energy of CO as well as the total amount of CO adsorbed. A Pt surface saturated with sulfur (6S x 0.75) was no longer able to adsorb any CO. Consequently, the rate of C02 formation also decreased continuously with increasing sulfur content of the surface and became practically zero for 6S x 0.28. These results demonstrate the role of sulfur as a rather effective catalyst poison. [Pg.69]

For 1,3-butadiene hydrogenation, the toxicity of sulfur is 3 (Fig. 13). which is lower than the toxicity for olefin hydrogenation. The hydrogenation of 1-butyne has also been studied for various ratios of sulfur over palladium. As was already published (86), the 1-butyne hydrogenation rate increases with time. The same effect has been observed on sulfided palladium. The turnover number is consequently presented for 1-butyne hydrogenation versus the sulfur content for various 1-butyne conversions (see Fig. 14). During the first minutes of reaction (0-25% conversion), the toxicity of sulfur appears close to 1 the rates are proportional to the free surface. However, at higher conversion, the rate becomes independent from the sulfur ratio. The toxicity is zero. [Pg.303]

Procedure Rinse the syringe several times with sample then fill it, clamp it onto the constant-rate injector, push the sliding carriage forward to penetrate the septum with the needle, and zero the meter. Turn on switch Si to start the stepper-motor syringe drive automatically and initiate the analysis cycle. After the 3-min hold point, the number displayed on the meter corresponds to the sulfur content of the injected sample. [Pg.891]

Sulfur levels in gasoline and diesel fuels have been decreasing steely over the last several years, primarily in response to government regulations both in the U.S. and in Western Europe. For example, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency s (EPA) Tier 2 emission standards mandate sulfur level reduction from current 330 and 550 mg/kg sulfur in gasoline and diesel, respectively, to 30 and 15 mg/kg by 2006 and near zero by 2010 and later years [1-3]. Regulations in California are even more restrictive. Similarly, EN 590 European diesel specification mandates sulfur content of diesels from 350 mg/kg maximum in 2000 to 10 mg/kg maximum by January 1, 2005 in European Union countries. [Pg.137]

To measure the validity of the EPM technique coals were chosen in which sulfate sulfur as determined by ASTM methods equaled zero and in which pyritic sulfur was minimal as determined by ASTM methods and as observed by optical microscopy. Since inorganic sulfur contents are small, any discrepancies between EPM and ASTM organic sulfur contents due to inaccurate pyrite or sulfate analysis also should be small. As can be seen in Table II the EPM analyses very closely approach those of the ASTM. [Pg.194]

Regressions for sulfur content and harvest date were calculated (Table XLIV) for each variety. The results show that the slopes of the regression lines are nearly zero, indicating only a slight effect for date of harvest on sulfur content. By interpolation of these regression lines it was possible to derive data equally spaced with respect to harvest date—an accomplishment which was not practical in the original determinations. These derived data were used in an analysis of variance which showed that sulfur content (on a dry basis) did not change with maturity. It is well known that the per cent of solids in sweet corn increases with maturity, and when sulfur content was expressed on a wet basis, it was found to increase with increase in total solids. [Pg.228]

Anodes with different sulfur contents were selected, prepared, and supplied by the Carbon Laboratory in Ardal. Four runs were made with graphite anodes as a zero sulfur carbon material. The sulfur content in the carbon anodes are given in Table 1.5.1. [Pg.44]

The FCC process is the most important refinery process mainly for the production of gasoline from heavy petroleum fractions, such as atmospheric and vacuum gas oil (VGO). In the FCC unit, the long hydrocarbons are cracked in the 480—540°C temperature range over zeolite catalysts to smaller n- and i-parafiins, n- and i-olefins, and aromatics. Conventional FCC feedstocks are relatively aromatic, with a high sulfur and nitrogen content, in contrast to FT waxes that are highly paraffinic with extra-low aromatics content (<1 wt%) and viitually zero sulfur (<5 ppm) (see Table 18.4). The development therefore of new catalyst formulations, as well as optimization of the overall process parameters, are both very critical to optimize the yield and quality of FCC products from FT waxes. [Pg.572]

The concentration of thiosulfate in the electrolyte was shown to be the primary factor determining the sulfur content of deposits and consequently their residual stress and mechanical properties [57]. The addition of thallium as a grain reflner was shown to reduce the deposits residual stress to almost zero, at least for a definite set of operative conditions a temperature of 50°C and c.d. within the range 0.4-0.6 A dm [30]. This electrolyte was found to be adequate for interconnection purposes even in the absence of additives [95]. [Pg.254]

Fig. 10.38 Plot of normalized crystallinity level as a function of log time for natural rubber cross-linked to varying extents with sulfur at 2 °C. Curve derived Avrami equation with = 3. Combined sulfur content in percent o zero 0.1 V 0.2 T 0.3 0.35 0.40 A 0.43 A 0.46 O 0.5. (Data from Bekkedahl and Wood (92))... Fig. 10.38 Plot of normalized crystallinity level as a function of log time for natural rubber cross-linked to varying extents with sulfur at 2 °C. Curve derived Avrami equation with = 3. Combined sulfur content in percent o zero 0.1 V 0.2 T 0.3 0.35 0.40 A 0.43 A 0.46 O 0.5. (Data from Bekkedahl and Wood (92))...
Enthalpy (H) is defined as the heat content of a substance at constant pressure. We cannot know absolute values of H, only differences in the enthalpies of substances. The enthalpy of formation, AHf of a substance at 25°C (298.15 K) and 1 bar pressure is its heat of formation from the elements in their most stable forms at that temperature and pressure. Here, and generally, the superscript degree symbol to the right of the state function denotes that the function is for 1 bar pressure. AHf for the elements in their most stable forms is taken as zero by definition at any temperature and 1 bar pressure. For example, AH° = 0 for rhombic sulfur, the most stable form of sulfur at 1 bar and 25°C. Monoclinic sulfur, with AHf = 0.071 kcal/mol at 1 bar and 25°C is unstable relative to the rhombic form. [Pg.4]

Ward and Myers [49] tried to determine the Sqo content of the sulfur melt directly using Raman spectroscopy. The Raman spectra of hot sulfur melts are characterized by very broad and overlapping signals. The authors assumed identical Raman scattering intensities for the stretching vibrations of Ss and Sc and an identical temperature dependence of these intensities. In addition, they neglected the S content of the melt. The obtained concentrations scatter considerably but indicate that the S o content increases from practically zero at 150 °C to ca. 70% by mass at 260 °C. From the temperature dependence of the Sc content the enthalpy of formation of was estimated as 19 kj mor (for more recent data, see later). [Pg.89]

The formation of S o in sulfur melts is a slow reaction, and it takes about 1 h at 160 °C to establish the equilibrium concentration [24, 58]. From the temperature dependence of the polymer content, from the heat capacity Cp of the melt [29] as well as from calorimetric measurements [56, 58] it was concluded that the reaction Ss Sqo is endothermic with an estimated activation energy of ca. 120 kj mor (Ss) [58]. The same value was derived from DSC measurements of liquid sulfur [58]. In this context it was observed that the sudden viscosity increase of liquid sulfur takes place at exactly 159 only if the heating rate approaches zero. If the heating rate is varied between 1.25 and 40 K min higher transition temperatures are observed as the data in Table 1 show [58]. [Pg.90]


See other pages where Zero sulfur content is mentioned: [Pg.587]    [Pg.587]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.834]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.922]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.891]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.1028]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.568]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.472]    [Pg.742]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.742]    [Pg.5064]    [Pg.509]    [Pg.742]    [Pg.449]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.110]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.587 ]




SEARCH



Sulfur content

© 2024 chempedia.info