Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Activation energies estimating

Amocat 1A was tested in an aging run for the hydroprocessing of 50% W. Kentucky SCT SRC. The run was made at constant conditions (2000 psig, 775°F, 0.5 LHSV) and was smoothly operated for 15 days. The run was then terminated due to incipient plugging in the reactor. The results are shown in Figure 10, where sulfur content in the liquid products has been plotted vs. days-on-stream. During this first four days the temperature was varied to obtain an activation energy estimation, and these data have been omitted. [Pg.189]

Table V. Activation Energies, Estimated Fold Loss, and Folding Endurance Retention at 105°C and a 72-hr Withdrawal Time... Table V. Activation Energies, Estimated Fold Loss, and Folding Endurance Retention at 105°C and a 72-hr Withdrawal Time...
TAPPI method, Reference 16. One withdrawal only (96 hr), 80°C moist oven. Activation energy. Estimated rate of change of °/o reflective brightness/hr X 10"5 Reference 16. Reference 20. at23.9°C. [Pg.304]

The kinetics of the dimer opening transformation were determined, with the activation energy estimated to be 89 kj mol-1. [Pg.37]

Since Baulch et al. s temperature data are taken mainly from combustion work, the activation energy estimated by Greiner and confirmed by Davis et al. (46c) will be used in the troposphere. [Pg.453]

Cobalt (III) complexes appear to have B and C values of about 500 and 3800 cm. , respectively. These typical values give a crossover point of 16,500 cm. , which has been used in Table III to estimate the spin-free activation energies of the other species, the spin-free activation energies being the amount by which 2A exceeds 5 B + 8 C. That the position of the spin-free crossover is not too low is indicated by the fact that the hypothetical spin-paired [Co Fe]" ion has a A value (Table IV) about equal to the crossover point estimated from the Racah parameters, B and C. The spin-paired activation energies, estimated at 0.4A, are also given in Table III for comparison purposes. [Pg.463]

A rough estimate of the Arrhenius parameters of this process can be obtained by assuming about 5 % of the overall reaction forms vinyl acetate at 600 °K, and an. 4-factor of 10 sec (i.c., the same as ethyl acetate). One obtains, k (diester vinyl acetate) lO exp (—42.9/Hr) sec The activation energy estimate is... [Pg.403]

Note that the activation energy for 4-hydroxy-4-methyl-2-pentanone (No. 9) is 8 kcal.mole lower than that of the /5-y-unsaturated alcohol (No. 5). This is just about half the difference between the carbonyl and olefin n-bond energies (75 and 60 kcal.mole , respectively), and therefore is in agreement with the rather crude method suggested for obtaining activation energy estimates for reverse ene type elimination reactions (see appendix). [Pg.447]

The empirical equation (1) used in estimating activation energies for the reverse ene reactions shows some promise in yielding reasonable activation energy estimates for Cope and Claisen type rearrangements as well (Table 131). However, additional data are needed before the usefulness of equation (1) can be assessed. [Pg.555]

Reaction orders and activation energies have been determined for Pt/ceria catalysts by several authors. " There is an agreement that the reaction order with respect to CO is approximately 0 at 200° C. Therefore high CO concentrations do not speed up the reaction for Pt-based catalysts at low temperature, as opposed to Cu-based catalysts which have approximately first-order kinetics. Activation energy estimates range from approximately 46kJ/moP to 80kJ/mol.[ l... [Pg.3210]

Irradiation of polyethylacrylate at different temperatures indicates that the insoluble fraction produced for a given dose decreases with temperature [851 (Fig. 15). The ratio p0lq0, however, is independent of temperature as shown in Fig. 16 [86]. One can thus conclude that in polyethylacrylate the quantum yields of crosslinking and chain scission both increase with temperature between — 10°C and 26°C (that is, above Tg = —17°C) with an activation energy estimated at 10 kcal mole-1 [Ref. 86]. [Pg.373]

The motion responsible for the relaxation is a rotation about the two co-linear bonds 1 and 7 such that the carbon atoms between bonds 1 and 7 move in the manner of a crankshaft. The co-linearity of the two terminal bonds is achievable if there are four intervening carbon atoms on the assumption of tetrahedral valence angles and a rotational isomeric state model. Support is to be found for the crankshaft mechanism in the fact that the activation energy estimated for the model, 54 kJ/mol, is close to the experimental results, 50-63 kJ/mol, and in the fact that the predicted free volume of activation, about four times the molar volume of a CH2 unit, is also in good agreement with experimental estimates based on pressure studies. [Pg.153]

Structural data, valence force constants and activation energy estimates (see Chapter 5) [54],... [Pg.209]

The activation energies estimated in this way are fisted in Table III. They agree qualitatively with the experimental values and account for the dependence on the size of the cation, at least for the Y samples. [Pg.475]

The reaction 2CH3 A C2Hg proceeds with negligible activation energy. Estimate k via the collision theory. [Pg.864]

Ensemble Catalyticphore based docking and activation energy estimation model N = 45 substrates for CYP3A4. N = 25 substrates for CYP3A4. 77.8-81.9% of metabolic sites correctly predicted using a combination of structure based method and activation energy estimation. 203... [Pg.326]

The strength and length scale of the hydrophobic interaction between hexadecane molecnles were also directly measured by SMFS. Hexadecane molecnles were tethered by flexible PEG linkers to AFM probes and substrates, and a layer of hydrophilic polymer was added to increase the accessibility of hydrophobic molecnles for the force spectroscopy measurements. A barrier was shown by the statistic analysis of the loading rate dependence of rnptnre forces the activation energy estimated from the dissociation rate was 41 6kJmol ... [Pg.3491]


See other pages where Activation energies estimating is mentioned: [Pg.416]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.554]    [Pg.436]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.476]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.595]    [Pg.497]    [Pg.240]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.152 ]




SEARCH



Energy Estimates

Energy Estimation

Energy estimated

© 2024 chempedia.info