Yield mechanical test

Mechanical Properties. The mechanical properties used for design shall be the minimum values allowed by the applicable material specification or shall be the minimum values determined by the manufacturer in accordance with the test procedures specified in ASTM A370 Methods and Definitions for Mechanical Testing of Steel Products, or by mill certification for mill products. The yield point shall be used in lieu of yield strength for those materials exhibiting a yield point. Yield strength shall be determined at 0.2% offset. 

While the surface modification is not effective to suppress cavitation, Yee and coworkers performed an experiment to suppress the cavitation mechanically in a rubber-modified epoxy network. They applied hydrostatic pressure during mechanical testing of rubber toughened epoxies [160]. At pressures above BOSS MPa the rubber particles are unable to cavitate and consequently no massive shear yielding is observed, resulting in poor mechanical properties just like with the unmodified matrix. These experiments proved that cavitation is a necessary condition for effective toughening. 

Puncture probes are commonly used for fruits and vegetables, and allow for the determination of force at rupture of the cellular structure. The procedure outlined below is adapted from the method of Bourne (1979). Cone penetrometers are commonly employed for determining firmness and yield value for foods such as margarine and butter, which may be a reflection of the product s spreadability. Quite often it is desirable to use a testing system that provides a constant deformation rate. Additionally, a mechanical testing machine allows for production of a force/deformation curve to further analyze the data. 

Most mechanical tests developed for fats are empirical in nature and are usually designed for quality control purposes, and they attempt to simulate consumer sensory perception (3, 4). These large-deformation tests measure hardness-related parameters, which are then compared with textural attributes evaluated by a sensory panel (3, 5). These tests include penetrometry using cone, pin, cylinder and several other geometries (3, 6-12), compression (13), extrusion (13, 14), spreadability (15, 16), texture profile analysis (2), shear tests (13), and sectility measurements (14). These methods are usually simple and rapid, and they require relatively inexpensive equipment (3, 4, 17). The majority of these tests are based on the breakdown of structure and usually yield single-parameter measurements such as hardness, yield stress, and spreadability, among others (4, 17-20). The relationship between these mechanical tests and the structure of a fat has, however, not been established. The ultimate aim of any materials science endeavor is to examine the relationship between structure and macroscopic properties. 

A brief description of mechanical tests that can be performed to obtain information on yielding in polymer materials is given below. Figure 14.5 shows some diagrams that reproduce the conditions of each type of experiment. 

It was observed that moisture uptake could affect the mechanical testing of these copolymers. Moisture caused lowered softening point and yield stress and increased notched impact strength, but it had no noticeable effect on un-notched impact strength. 

Two types of mechanical tests have been used the low rate of deformation tensile, compressive or bending tests and the high speed impact tests. Immiscibility of polymers is reflected in both. For example, in tensile tests the maximum strain at break (or the maximum elongation), and the yield stress (or the maximum strength) can be... 

Mechanical tests, molecular weight, and solubility measurements on irradiated PMMA/SAN blends showed that phenyl substitution in one of the polymers can offer partial radiation protection to the other component. Protective effects of the phenyl group are short range and occur only in miscible blends where mixing at the molecular level exists. However, the protection is not complete since some 15% of the yield for main chain scission in PMMA could not be suppressed, even at high styrene (in SAN) concentrations. 

Mechanistic Uncertainties and Errors. Mass-balance mechanism yield consistency tests are definitive only to the extent that complementary changes in the product yield distributions have been monitored. To illustrate the nature of this limitation, we recall that stable and activated nascent products are formed from F-for-F Reaction 18 via respective Reactions 24 and 25. Because the yield from Reaction 25 is not subject to decomposition, no (P/Z) interdependence is possible between these contributions to Y(CH3CHF F). Chemical intuition thus provides the only basis for assigning the species from Reactions 24 and 25 to the same primary reaction channel (25,34,45). 

---