Weight-loss units, conversion

The corrosion rate of a metal in terms of weight loss per unit area (g m" d ) or rate of penetration (mm y" ) can be calculated from Faraday s law if the current density is known. Conversely, the corrosion current density can be evaluated from the weight loss per unit area or from the rate of penetration. The following symbols and units have been adopted in deriving these relationships in which it is assumed that corrosion is uniform and the rate is linear ... 

Conversion of mm/y to gmd or vice versa requires knowledge of the metal density. A given weight loss per unit area for a light metal (e.g., aluminum) represents a greater actual loss of metal thickness than the same weight loss for a heavy metal (e.g., lead). Conversion tables are given in the Appendix, Section 29.8. 

The corrosion current itself can be either estimated by using specialized electrochemical methods or by using weight-loss data and a conversion chart (Table 3.1) based on Faraday s principle. Table 3.1 provides the conversion factors between commonly used corrosion rate units for all metals and Table 3.2 describes these conversion factors adapted to iron or steel (Fe) for which n = 2, M = 55.85 g/ mol and d = 7.88 g cm... 

The Starting point for the production of oriented films is the Durham precursor route (figure 1) which was developed by Feast and coworkers [3], This route utilises a soluble, non-conjugated precursor polymer, polymer B, which can be converted to a fully dense form of polyacetylene by the thermal elimination of hexafluoroorthoxylene [4-6], This conversion process occurs in three stages [6,15,16], The initial elimination of aromatic units from the polymer (transformation) is followed by evaporation of the volatile product from the polymer and, finally, isomerisation of the cis-rich material formed after transformation to the trans-isomer. The kinetics of these reactions have been extensively studied using DSC, i,r, spectroscopy and weight-loss measurements [6],... 

The thermal efficiency of all the systems are falling, but at different rates. The smallest radiator drops from 27% efficiency at 200 kWth to 11% efficiency at 400 kWth. This means that in the process of doubling the thermal output of the reactor the conversion efficiency has dropped by more than half, causing a net loss in power output. On the other hand, the 200 m 2 radiator drops from an efficiency of 36% to 27%, a drop of a third, while the thermal power doubles, generating a net increase in power output (400. 27 > 200. 36). Finally, the weight of the system needs to be examined. One way of expressing this is the inverse specific power (expressed in estimated system kg /power output) vs. the thermal power of the system. This is shown in 6-4. The density per unit surface area of the radiator was fixed at 5 kg/m ... 

The choice of the moderator material for a central-station powerplant is generally based on the economics involved. Obviously, many factors other than the cost per unit weight or volume, per se, enter into the economics. The neutron slowing-down capability of the material has an important effect on the size of the reactor core and, therefore, the capital cost of the plant, because of the investment in moderator, pressure vessel, shielding, etc. Containment requirements for the moderator (particularly liquid moderators) can affect both the capital cost of the plant and the fuel cycle economics, the latter because of possible neutron losses. Integrity and stability of the moderator material can, of course, have important implications on other aspects of the reactor design. The neutron absorption behavior of the moderator itself affects the potential conversion ratio of the reactor and, therefore, the fuel cycle economics of the reactor. The properties of the more important moderators and the implications of these properties on the choice and performance characteristics of gas-cooled reactors will be reviewed in this section. 

A similar synthesis strategy was employed to construct high-weight catalysts carrying multiple catalytic centers in the outer core of the dendrimer [137]. The catalyst depicted below is characterized by 16 catalytic centers. It was found to be more active in the hydroformylation of vinyl arenes than its synthetic precursor carrying only four catalytic units. The ratio of branched to linear aldehydes ranged from 36 1 to 39 1 at >99% conversion. By simple filtration, the dendrimeric catalyst was separated from the product. Even the 10th hydroformylation cycle proceeded without loss of activity and selectivity. 

---