Wave, simple centered

For simple centered waves, each level of stress propagates at a discrete speed c. In this case, the wave speed corresponds to a given increment of stress or particle velocity and is a function of stress alone. Accordingly,... 

The difficulty of evaluating the effect on the tunneling current of the tip electronic structure was approached by Tersoff-Hamann by assuming a simple, s-wavc tip model with wave functions centered at a point Fq in the tip. In the limit of low-bias voltages, the total tunnel current can then be expressed as follows ... 

The metal cluster will be modeled as an infinitely deep spherical potential well with the represented by an infinitely high spherical barrier. Let us place this barrier in the center of the spherical cluster to simplify the calculations. The simple Schrodinger equation, containing only the interaction of the electrons with the static potential and the kinetic energy term and neglecting any electron-electron interaction, can then be solved analytically, the solutions for the radial wave functions being linear combinations of spherical Bessel and Neumann functions. 

If Cm -I- 3Cii > 0, a centered simple wave will be produced by impact loading, and a record of this waveform suffices to determine the entire uniaxial stress-strain relation over the range of strains encountered. Vitreous silica is a material responding in this manner, and its coefficients have been determined by Barker and Hollenbach [70B01] (see also [72G02]) on the basis of a simple-wave analysis. 

In the above treatment of the problem of the particle in a box, no consideration was given to its natural symmetry. As the potential function is symmetric with respect to the center of the box, it is intuitively obvious that this position should be chosen as the origin of the abscissa. In Fig. 4b, x =s 0 at the center of the box and the walls are symmetrically placed at x = 1/2. Clearly, the analysis must in this case lead to the same result as above, because the particle does not know what coordinate system has been chosen It is sufficient to replace x by x +1/2 in the solution given by Eq. (68). This operation is a simple translation of the abscissa, as explained in Section 1.2. The result is shown in Fig. 4b, where the wave function is now given by... 

The simple energy-gap scheme of Figure 4.6 seems to indicate that transitions in solids should be broader than in atoms, but still centered on defined energies. However, interband transitions usually display a complicated spectral shape. This is due to the typical band structure of solids, because of the dependence of the band energy E on the wave vector k ( k =2nl a, a being an interatomic distance) of electrons in the crystal. 

Here, AT is a constant, f is the incoming intensity, R is the distance of the scattered wave from the molecule (in practical terms, it is the distance between the scattering center and the point of observation), i and j are the labels of atoms in the jV-atomic molecule, g contains the electron scattering amplitudes and phases of atoms, 5 is a simple function of the scattering angle and the electron wavelength, I is the mean vibrational amplitude of a pair of nuclei, r is the intemuclear distance r is the equilibrium intemuclear distance and is an effective intemuclear distance), and k is an asymmetry parameter related to anharmonicity of the vibration of a pair of nuclei. 

The Hy-CI function used for molecular systems is based on the MO theory, in which molecular orbitals are many-center linear combinations of one-center Cartesian Gaussians. These combinations are the solutions of Hartree-Fock equations. An alternative way is to employ directly in Cl and Hylleraas-CI expansions simple one-center basis functions instead of producing first the molecular orbitals. This is a subject of the valence bond theory (VB). This type of approach, called Hy-CIVB, has been proposed by Cencek et al. (Cencek et.al. 1991). In the full-CI or full-Hy-CI limit (all possible CSF-s generated from the given one-center basis set), MO and VB wave functions become identical each term in a MO-expansion is simply a linear combination of all terms from a VB-expansion. Due to the non-orthogonality of one-center functions the mathematical formalism of the VB theory for many-electron systems is rather cumbersome. However, for two-electron systems this drawback is not important and, moreover, the VB function seems in this case more natural. 

As a simple example to illustrate reciprocal-space solutions to the many-center one-particle problem, we can think of an electron moving in the Coulomb potential of two nuclei, with nuclear charges Zi and Z2, located respectively at positions Xi and X2. In the crude approximation where we use only a single Is orbital on each nucleus, we can represent the electronic wave function of this system by ... 

We take a very simple case of a pair of orbitals a and b that can bond. We assume the orbitals are at two different centers. The simplest LCAO approximation to the bonding orbital is cr = A a + b), and the antibonding coimterpart is o = B a — b). Here A = 1/V2(1 + S) and B = 1 /V2(l — S), where S is the overlap integral, are the normalization constants. Consider the simple three-electron doublet wave function... 

In the s-wave-tip model (Tersoff and Hamann, 1983, 1985), the tip was also modeled as a protruded piece of Sommerfeld metal, with a radius of curvature R, see Fig. 1.25. The solutions of the Schrodinger equation for a spherical potential well of radius R were taken as tip wavefunctions. Among the numerous solutions of this macroscopic quantum-mechanical problem, Tersoff and Hamann assumed that only the s-wave solution was important. Under such assumptions, the tunneling current has an extremely simple form. At low bias, the tunneling current is proportional to the Fermi-level LDOS at the center of curvature of the tip Pq. 

Discovering what lies behind a hill or beyond a neighborhood can be as simple as taking a short walk. But curiosity and the urge to make new discoveries usually require people to undertake journeys much more adventuresome than a short walk, and scientists often study realms far removed from everyday observation—sometimes even beyond the present means of travel or vision. Polish astronomer Nicolaus Copernicus s (1473-1543) heliocentric (Sun-centered) model of the solar system, published in 1543, ushered in the modern age of astronomy more than 400 years before the first rocket escaped Earth s gravity. Scientists today probe the tiny domain of atoms, pilot submersibles into marine trenches far beneath the waves, and analyze processes occurring deep within stars. 

Hoskin Lambourn (Ref 26) examined the system of a detonation initiated simultaneously at the expl face in contact with one of two metal plates, ie, an asymmetric metal/expl/metal sandwich . They assumed that the detonation products are isentropic with a constant adiabatic exponent = 3, and showed that the motion of both plates can be determined by the continued reflection of centered simple waves. The path of the reflected shock was followed by an approximate method for two traverses of the detonation products, and the process can be continued indefinitely... 

Consider each boron atom to be ip3 hybridized.123 The two terminal B—H bonds on each boron atom presumably are simple a bonds involving a pair of electrons each. This accounts for eight of the total of twelve electrons available for bonding. Each of the bridging B—H—B linkages then involves a delocalized or three-center bond as follows. The appropriate combinations of the three orbital wave functions. B. d>D, (approximately spi hybrids), and (an s orbital) result in three molecular orbitals ... 

Wavefunctions of electrons in atoms are called atomic orbitals. The name was chosen to suggest something less definite than an orbit of an electron around a nucleus and to take into account the wave nature of the electron. The mathematical expressions for atomic orbitals—which are obtained as solutions of the Schrodinger equation—are more complicated than the sine functions for the particle in a box, but their essential features are quite simple. Moreover, we must never lose sight of their interpretation, that the square of a wavefunction tells us the probability density of an electron at each point. To visualize this probability density, we can think of a cloud centered on the nucleus. The density of the cloud at each point represents the probability of finding an electron there. Denser regions of the cloud therefore represent locations where the electron is more likely to be found. 

The indices hkl of the reflection give the three frequencies necessary to describe the Fourier term as a simple wave in three dimensions. Recall from Chapter 2, Section VI.B, that any periodic function can be approximated by a Fourier series, and that the approximation improves as more terms are added to the series (see Fig. 2.14). The low-frequency terms in Eq. (5.18) determine gross features of the periodic function p(x,y,z), whereas the high-frequency terms improve the approximation by filling in fine details. You can also see in Eq. (5.18) that the low-frequency terms in the Fourier series that describes our desired function p(x,y,z) are given by reflections with low indices, that is, by reflections near the center of the diffraction pattern (Fig. 5.2). 

After looking at the VB outputs for the simple two-center/two-electron (2e/2c) bond, let us get used to the theory by applying it to these bonds to start with. A VB determinant is an antisymmetrized wave function that may or may not also be a proper spin eigenfunction. For example, ab in Equation 3.1 is a determinant that describes two spin—orbitals a and b, each having one electron the bar over the b orbital means a (3 spin, and the absence of a bar means an a spin ... 

More recently Hiberty et ol[26] proposed the breathing orbital valence bond (BOVB) method, which can perhaps be described as a combination of the Coulson-Fisher method and techniques used in the early calculations of the Weinbaum.[7] The latter are characterized by using differently scaled orbitals in different VB structures. The BOVB does not use direct orbital scaling, of course, but forms linear combinations of AOs to attain the same end. Any desired combination of orbitals restricted to one center or allowed to cover more than one is provided for. These workers suggest that this gives a simple wave function with a simultaneous effective relative accuracy. 

The first term in the product is associated with the spatial part and the second with the spin labels. The letters ua and b stand for atomic orbitals centered in hydrogen atoms Ha and H respectively. To account for the indistinguishability of the electrons, spatial and spin factors appear in two products (configurations). Consequently, the VB approach is multideterminantal from the outset. This superposition of determinants causes the VB wave function, even in its most simple form, to maintain the indistinguishability of the electrons within the chemical bond. This effect is called exclusion correlation , a non-dynamical correlation effect. 

---