Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Improved approximations

As a comparison with the exact solution of the Stefan problem shows, the quasisteady approximation discussed in the last section only holds for sufficiently large values of the phase transition number, around Ph 7. There are no exact solutions for solidification problems with finite overall heat transfer resistances to the cooling liquid or for problems involving cylindrical or spherical geometry, and therefore we have to rely on the quasi-steady approximation. An improvement to this approach in which the heat stored in the solidified layer is at least approximately considered, is desired and was given in different investigations. [Pg.184]

In the procedure of asymptotic approximation no arbitrary approximation functions are used, instead a series of functions [Pg.184]

The functions i(x, t) and Si(t) can be recursively determined from the exact formulation of the problem with the heat conduction equation and its associated boundary conditions. Thereby o(x,t) and so(t) correspond to the quasi-steady approximation with Ph — oo. [Pg.185]

Stephan and B. Holzknecht [2.50] have solved the solidification problems dealt with in 2.3.6.2 in this way Unfortunately the expressions yielded for terms with i 1 were very complex and this made it very difficult to calculate the solidification-time explicitly K. Stephan and B. Holzknecht therefore derived simpler and rather accurate approximation equations for the solidification speed. [Pg.185]

Finally the numerical solution of solidification problems should be mentioned, which due to the moving phase boundary contains additional difficulties. As we will not be looking at these solutions in section 2.4, at this point we would suggest the work by K. Stephan and B. Holzknecht [2.51] as well as the contributions from D.R. Atthey, J. Crank and L. Fox in [2.40] as further reading. [Pg.185]


The algorithm contains five minimisation procedures which are performed the same way as in the method " i.e. by minimisation of the RMS between the measured unidirectional distribution and the corresponding theoretical distribution of die z-component of the intensity of the leakage field. The aim of the first minimisation is to find initial approximations of the depth d, of the crack in the left half of its cross-section, die depth d in its right half, its half-width a, and the parameter c. The second minimisation gives approximations of d, and d and better approximations of a and c based on estimation of d,= d, and d,= d,j. Improved approximations of d] and d4 are determined by the third minimisation while fixing new estimations of d dj, dj, and dj. Computed final values dj , d/, a and c , whieh are designated by a subscript c , are provided by the fourth minimisation, based on improved estimations of d, dj, dj, and d . The fifth minimisation computes final values d, , d, dj, d while the already computed dj , d/, a and c are fixed. [Pg.688]

Ratings may be improved approximately by 20 H if the busbars are painted black with a non-metallic malt Finish paint. This is because the heat dissipation through a surface depends upon it.s temperature, type of surface and colour. A rough surface dissipates heat more readily than a smooth surface and a black body more quickly than a normal surface. See also Section 31.4.4 and Table 31.1. [Pg.920]

The iteration scheme allows to compute an improved approximation 0 j given a previous approximation as an input. If after a number of iterations 0 j 0 ... [Pg.166]

For the new, slightly distorted macromolecular nuclear geometry K, the electronic density can be expressed as the improved approximation... [Pg.75]

In the MQC mean-field trajectory scheme introduced above, all nuclear DoF are treated classically while a quantum mechanical description is retained only for the electronic DoF. This separation is used in most implementations of the mean-field trajectory method for electronically nonadiabatic dynamics. Another possibility to separate classical and quantum DoF is to include (in addition to the electronic DoF) some of the nuclear degrees of freedom (e.g., high frequency modes) into the quantum part of the calculation. This way, typically, an improved approximation of the overall dynamics can be obtained—albeit at a higher numerical cost. This idea is the basis of the recently proposed self-consistent hybrid method [201, 202], where the separation between classical and quantum DoF is systematically varied to improve the result for the overall quantum dynamics. For systems in the condensed phase with many nuclear DoF and a relatively smooth distribution of the electronic-vibrational coupling strength (e.g.. Model V), the separation between classical and quanmm can, in fact, be optimized to obtain numerically converged results for the overall quantum dynamics [202, 203]. [Pg.270]

In all results of the MFT method discussed so far, all vibrational modes have been treated classically. As has been mentioned above, an improved approximation of the overall dynamics can be obtained if some of the vibrational modes are included in the quantum-mechanical treatment. Figure 9... [Pg.271]

Therefore, the main route to better performance of TDDFRT is through improved approximation of the ground-state xc potential vxc, while the simple ALDA for the xc kernel can be used for many chemical applications. Improved approximations for vxc will be considered in the next section. [Pg.62]

The FO method was the first algorithm available in NONMEM and has been evaluated by simulation and used for PK and PD analysis [9]. Overall, the FO method showed a good performance in sparse data situations. However, there are situations where the FO method does not yield adequate results, especially in data rich situations. For these situations improved approximation methods such as the first-order conditional estimation (FOCE) and the Laplacian method became available in NONMEM. The difference between both methods and the FO method lies in the way the linearization is done. [Pg.460]

The vector fl is the vector of corrections which must be applied to the first approximation B(0) of the desired variables to give an improved approximation to be used in the next iteration step, B(0) + B(0). The iterations are to be continued... [Pg.74]

Although flows in combustors usually are turbulent, analyses of flame stabilization are often based on equations of laminar flow. This may not be as bad as it seems because in the regions of the flow where stabilization occurs, distributed reactions may be dominant, since reaction sheets may not have had time to develop an approximation to the turbulent flow might then be obtained from the laminar solutions by replacing laminar diffusivities by turbulent difTu-sivities in the results. Improved approximations may b "sought by moment methods (Section 10.1.2). Turbulent-flow theories are not discussed here, but some comments on results for turbulent flows are made. A review of theories for stabilization in turbulent flows is available [2]. [Pg.503]

A commonly used method of approximating the productive capacity of a body of reserves is to assume that a minimum reserve-to-production ratio (usually 10) is required to provide for adequate delivery rates. This rule of thumb approach does not consider the sometimes rather wide variations experienced with actual gas reservoirs. In an attempt to make an improved approximation of future long-term gas deliverability, the FPC staflF developed a method to estimate the national production capability for each year by the computerized application of a national availability curve. This curve was synthesized from FPC Form 15 deliverability data from more than 900 individual sources of supply which comprised more than 88% of the interstate and 62% of the national reserves in 1968. This method is superior to an R/P limit approach because it is derived from deliverability data which consider actual reservoir production characteristics. [Pg.8]


See other pages where Improved approximations is mentioned: [Pg.207]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.1096]    [Pg.546]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.1322]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.465]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.375]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.685]    [Pg.239]   


SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info