Water quality, regional control boards

Regulatory status In 1998, Lopez Canyon Sanitary Landfill received conditional approval for an ET cover, which required a minimum of 2 years of field performance data to validate the model used for the design. An analysis was conducted and provided the basis for final regulatory approval of the ET cover. The cover was fully approved in October 2002 by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board—Los Angeles Region. [Pg.1082]

The Ralph M. Parsons Company Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region, California Republic Geothermal Research and Development Associates... [Pg.212]

Region California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) Order No. 85-17, which was adopted in February 1985, reflecting the potential regional adverse impact on overall groundwater quality. [Pg.387]

State and regional regulatory agencies may also establish general effluent limitations for a particular water body to control the total discharge of toxic pollutants. Table 15 shows the discharge limits for toxic pollutants established by the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Board (1986). [Pg.271]

California Water Resources Control Board. Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin, Region 2, 1986. [Pg.306]

CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARDS... [Pg.139]

Discharge of waste to land requires a discharge permit. Regional Water Quality Control Board... [Pg.149]

Abatement by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region, has included ditches to divert surface water from the mine workings, a seal at the mine adit, and operation of a pilot mine wastewater treatment plant to remove residual toxic heavy metals as part of contingency planning. [Pg.384]

Anon, "Pilot Plant Treatment of Mine Drainage, Walker Mine, Plumas County, Callfomle," Draft Report prepared for California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Velley Region, by Pearson and Associates, Richmond, California, Regional Board Project 1-043-150-0, March 1983. [Pg.403]

The California Regional Water Quality Control Board urgently needs your advice, both as to the maximum concentrations of metham that will be encountered at different points along the Sacramento River, and as to the total load that will enter Shasta Lake. [Pg.183]

California Regional Water Quality Control Board. [Pg.329]

Klant, R.R. Unpublished information from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region, June 17, 1983. [Pg.434]

NOTE Samples of wator from 3 agricultural evaporation ponds in the San Joaquin Wley, and from a drain sump (T4) and the San Ltiis water delivery canal, were analyzed without concentration or cleanup. Hie samfdes and analyses of th ionic content were provided to us fay the California Central blley Regional Ubtor Quality Control Board. [Pg.75]

Support of this work was provided by the California Department of Pesticide Regulation, die California Department of Food and Agriculture Fertilizer Research and Education Program, the Orange County Farm Bureau, State Water Resources Control Board/Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board EPA 319(h). [Pg.229]

Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...