Water concentration, time evolution

The steady-state problem yields a system of simultaneous linear algebraic equations that can be solved by Gaussian elimination and back substitution. I shall turn now to calculating the time evolution of this system, starting from a phosphate distribution that is not in steady state. In this calculation, assume that the phosphate concentration is initially the same in all reservoirs and equal to the value in river water, 10 I 3 mole P/m3. How do the concentrations evolve from this starting value to the steady-state values just calculated ... 

Figure 7.3 Comparative evolution of the concentration for a non-reactive species and a reactive species when the input concentration is doubled at t=0. In this particular case, th = 0.2 is the water residence time in time units, a,- = 4 the reactivity coefficient, equation (7.2.8), of the reactive species.

The time evolution of the concentration is illustrated in Fig. 9.2.2, using a diffusion constant that is typical for diffusional motion in liquid water. The curve at t = 25 ns is very close to being stationary, consistent with the steady-state boundary condition... 

The physical model of the reactor is a 350 mm high cylindrical vessel, with a diameter of 200 mm and an elliptical bottom. The operation volume is V = 12 10 m. The entrance of the reactants is placed near the middle of the reactor, more exactly at 130 mm from the bottom. The reactor s exit is positioned on the top of the vessel but below the liquid level. At the vessel centre is placed a mixer with three helicoidal paddles with d/D = 0.33. It operates with a rotation speed of 150 mirnf In order to establish the reactor flow model, this is filled with pure water which continuously flushes through the reactor at a flow rate of 6.6 10 5 m /s (similar to the reactants flow rate). At time t = 0, a unitary impulse of an NaCl solution with a Cq = 3.6 kg/m is introduced into the reactor input. The time evolution of the NaCl concentration at the exit flow of the reactor is measured by the conductivity. Table 3.5 gives the data that show the evolution of this concentration at the reactor exit. 

Figure 14. Time evolution of the composition of the percolating water in the downstream part of the alteration profile of a pyrite-rich sandstone. = 10. The concentration of the dissolved species are given in mol/kg and the quantities of neoformed minerals are given in mol as a function of the parameter of advancement of the reaction t All data are represented as the logarithm of the molality (log m) vs. log. XU(a) corresponds to [U/Fe] = 5 X 10 (molar ratio) leached within the sandstone. U(l)) corresponds to the maximum possible dissolved uranium concentration. All the curves are direct Benson plots from the computer.

Several methods have been published to simulate the time-evolution of an ionization track in water. Monte Carlo (with the IRT method or step-by-step) and deterministic programs including spur diffusion are the main approaches. With the large memory and powerful computer now available, simulation has become more efficient. The modeling of a track structure and reactivity is more and more precise and concepts can now be embedded in complex simulation programs. Therefore corrections of rate constants with high concentrations of solutes in the tracks and the concept of multiple ionizations have improved the calculation of G-values and their dependence on time. 

Besides fluorescence spectroscopy, time-resolved spectroscopy can rely on the measurement of excited (singlet or triplet) state absorption. Similarly to ground-state absorption, the spectral and absorbance properties may be altered by CyD complexation and yield information about the behavior of the complex in the excited state in addition, the time dependence (formation and decay) of the excited state absorption yields information about the kinetics and dynamics of the system. This is illustrated by the behavior of the lowest triplet state of naphthalene as measured by nanosecond spectroscopy using a Q-switched Nd YAG laser at 266 nm for excitation [21]. The triplet-triplet absorption spectra were measured in neat solvents (water and ethanol) and in the presence of a- and -CyD (Fig. 10.3.3). The spectra in ethanol and H2O had the same absorption maximum, but the transition was considerably weaker and broadened in H2O. Both CyDs induced a red shift, and a-CyD additionally narrowed the main band considerably. Fig. 10.3.4 shows the effect of a-CD concentration on the time evolution of the triplet-triplet absorption at 416 nm in the microsecond range. Triplet decay was caused by O2 quenching a detailed kinetic analysis of the time dependence yielded two main components which could be assigned to the free guest and the 1 2 complex, in full... 

Rg. 4-S. Time evolution of the scattering curves of SS-121 latex dispersed in a water-ethanol mixture. The curves 1,2, and 3 were taken at 1 week, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks after simple preparation, respectively. Curves 2 and 3 were shifted vertically by an order of 10. Latex concentration = 3.7 vol.%. Water ethanol = 3 2 in volume. Accumulation time = 30 s for each point. Taken from [53], Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences, USA... 

The apparatus required is similar to that described for Diphenylmelhane (Section IV,4). Place a mixture of 200 g. (230 ml.) of dry benzene and 40 g. (26 ml.) of dry chloroform (1) in the flask, and add 35 g. of anhydrous aluminium chloride in portions of about 6 g. at intervals of 5 minutes with constant shaking. The reaction sets in upon the addition of the aluminium chloride and the liquid boils with the evolution of hydrogen chloride. Complete the reaction by refluxing for 30 minutes on a water bath. When cold, pour the contents of the flask very cautiously on to 250 g. of crushed ice and 10 ml. of concentrated hydrochloric acid. Separate the upper benzene layer, dry it with anhydrous calcium chloride or magnesium sulphate, and remove the benzene in a 100 ml. Claisen flask (see Fig. II, 13, 4) at atmospheric pressure. Distil the remaining oil under reduced pressure use the apparatus shown in Fig. 11,19, 1, and collect the fraction b.p. 190-215°/10 mm. separately. This is crude triphenylmethane and solidifies on cooling. Recrystallise it from about four times its weight of ethyl alcohol (2) the triphenylmethane separates in needles and melts at 92°. The yield is 30 g. 

Place an intimate mixture of 125 g. of powdered, anhydrous zinc chloride and 26-5 g. of acetophenonephenylhydrazone in a tall 500 ml. beaker in an oil bath at 170°. Stir the mixture vigorously by hand. After 3-4 minutes the mass becomes hquid and evolution of white fumes commences. Remove the beaker from the bath and stir the mixture for 5 minutes. Then stir in 100 g. of clean, white sand in order to prevent solidification to a hard mass. Digest the mixture for 12-16 hours on a water bath with 400 ml. of water and 12 ml. of concentrated hydrochloric acid in order to dissolve the zinc chloride. Filter off the sand and the crude 2-phenylindole, and boil the solids with 300 ml. of rectified spirit. Treat the hot mixture with a little decolourising carbon and filter through a pre-heated Buchner funnel wash the residue with 40 ml. of hot rectified spirit. Cool the combined filtrates to room temperature, filter off the 2-phenylindole and wash it three times with 10 ml. portions of cold alcohol. Dry in a vacuum desiccator over anhydrous calcium chloride. The yield of pure 2-phenylindole, m.p. 188-189°, is 16 g. 

---