Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Wastewater treatment plant removal efficiencies

The literature data suggest that BPs are generally efficiently removed from wastewater by biological processes [48, 61]. In various sewage treatment plants, removal efficiency of BP-3 ranged from 28-30 % to 68-96 %. The authors point out that a lack of biological wastewater treatment clearly reduces the effectiveness of their removal in treatment plants [61]. [Pg.165]

Efficiencies for removal in the wastewater treatment plant were estimated for total and soluble BOD, total COD, soluble COD, color, total suspended and dissolved solids, and total solids. The removal efficiencies summarized in Table 21.14 are high for total BOD, soluble BOD, and suspended solids, at 96%, 96%, and 95%, respectively. The removal efficiencies for total and soluble COD were significantly lower at 76% and 66%, respectively. The removal efficiency for color was only about 38%. This value is typical for biological treatment of pulp and paper wastewater, and may be due, at least partially, to the formation of new colored groups when the bleach effluents are oxidized in the treatment system. [Pg.901]

Although a number of precautions have been mentioned for the control of sulfide by precipitation as FeS, this methodology is often considered not only acceptable but also cheap and efficient. Added iron salts may also be reused in the treatment process. Under aerobic conditions in the wastewater treatment plant, the amorphous FeS is fast oxidized, and the iron can be used for chemical removal of phosphate. [Pg.156]

According to the EU project entitled Knowledge and Need Assessment on Pharmaceutical Products in Environmental Waters (KNAPPE), ecopharmacovig-ilance deals with APIs monitoring of sources, distribution, fate and biological impact on ecosystems and, ultimately, on human health [5], which environmental levels depend on the amounts sold/consumed, pharmacokinetic behaviour, degradation and wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) removal efficiency. [Pg.216]

Conventional wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) were not designed for an efficient APIs removal. The sludge retention time (SRT) is one of the crucial parameters, which influence on the design, operation and control of WWTPs. APIs can be divided into three major groups compounds with optimum SRT range for which their removal is the most effective (e.g., antibiotics and antiinflammatories), compounds on which SRT has no impact (e.g., anticonvulsants, p-blockers and hormones), compounds with visible influence of SRT on their removal rate (e.g., lipid regulators) [43]. [Pg.219]

Bergqvist, P.-A., L. Augulyte, and V. Jurjoniene. 2006. PAH and PCB removal efficiencies in Umea (Sweden) and Siauliai (Lithuania) municipal wastewater treatment plants. Water Air Soil Pollut. 175 291-303. [Pg.469]

The environmental behavior and fate of heavy metals in sludge-amended soils are mediated and, to a degree, controlled by sewage treatment. Although there have been numerous studies on the principal processes that control the speciation and efficiency of removal of metals in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) (Brown et al, 1973 Sterrit et al., 1981 Goldstone et al, 1990), studies on the behavior of oxy-anions in various treatment systems have been very limited. The oxy-anions of most concern in wastewater treatment programs are those formed by arsenic, molybdenum, selenium, and vanadium. A common feature of the four elements that differentiates them from other metals is that their primary occurrence as oxy-anions means that a change in redox condition can drastically alter the form of the element, and hence its behavior in the treatment system and amended soils. [Pg.211]

Limbach, L.K., Bereiter, R., Muller, E., Krebs, R., Galli, R., Stark, W.J., 2008. Removal of oxide nanoparticles in a model wastewater treatment plant influence of agglomeration and surfactants on clearing efficiency. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 5828—5833. [Pg.267]

The following sections of the present manuscript will review the analytical methodologies developed in Spain to detect ilUcit drags and metabolites in wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) influent and effluent water samples, the removal efficiency of the investigated WWTPs, and the impact that the discharged treated waters have on the levels of these compounds in surface waters in Spam. [Pg.118]

Precipitation is often applied to the removal of most metals from wastewater including zinc, cadmium, chromium, copper, fluoride, lead, manganese, and mercury. Also, certain anionic species can be removed by precipitation, such as phosphate, sulfate, and fluoride. Note that in some cases, organic compounds may form organometallic complexes with metals, which could inhibit precipitation. Cyanide and other ions in the wastewater may also complex with metals, making treatment by precipitation less efficient. A cutaway view of a rapid sand filter that is most often used in a municipal treatment plant is illustrated in Figure 4. The design features of this filter have been relied upon for more than 60 years in municipal applications. [Pg.246]


See other pages where Wastewater treatment plant removal efficiencies is mentioned: [Pg.180]    [Pg.902]    [Pg.916]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.484]    [Pg.948]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.4731]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.3882]    [Pg.314]    [Pg.1985]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.510]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.397]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.222]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.902 ]




SEARCH



Treatment plants

Wastewater efficiently

Wastewater removal

Wastewater treatment

Wastewater treatment plant

© 2024 chempedia.info