Waste disposal grades

Revegetation is a cost-effective method to stabilize the surface of hazardous waste disposal sites, especially when preceded by capping and grading. Revegetation decreases erosion by wind and water and contributes to the development of a naturally fertile and stable surface environment. It may be part of a long-term site reclamation project, or it may be used on a temporary or seasonal basis to stabilize intermediate cover surfaces at waste disposal sites. 

As shown previously, radioactive hazards associated with SF and HLW decrease exponentially over time (see Figure 2). After 10" -10 yr, the risk to the public of a nuclear waste disposal vault approaches that of a high-grade uranium ore deposit and is less than the time invariant toxicity risk of ore deposits of mercury and lead (Langmuir, 1997a). The new ERA standard for nuclear waste repositories seeks to limit exposures from all exposure pathways for the reasonably maximally exposed individual living 18 km from a nuclear waste repository to 0.15mSvyr (15 mrem yr ) (US EPA, 2001). For comparison. 

Considerable financial gain can be realized by minimizing the volumes of solvent used and by selecting less expensive solvents and grades of solvents, as appropriate. Minimizing the volume of solvent used also helps contain the cost of waste disposal. 

All solutions are required to be prepared with autoclaved ultrapure water (deionized water with a sensitivity of 18 MQ cm at 25 °C) and analytical grade reagents. Store the reagents as indicated. Conform to all waste disposal and safety regulations while preparing and disposing the materials. 

Prepare all solutions using nuclease-free ultrapure water (18 MQ cm at 25 °C). All reagents used are analytical grade. Prepare and store all reagents at room temperature (unless indicated otherwise). All waste disposal regulations are stricdy followed when disposing waste materials. 

In Chapter 2, we take a more detailed look at the analytical chemistry pertaining to key commercial activities, that is, uranium mining and its utilization in the nuclear fuel cycle (NFC) first, in the milling process, uranium-containing deposits are processed to form uranium ore concentrates (UOC) that are then shipped to uranium conversion facilities (UCF), where the uranium is transformed into high-purity nuclear grade compounds. These can serve as fuel for nuclear power plants or as feed material for isotope enrichment. Then we discuss the analytical aspects of compliance with the strict specifications of the materials used in enrichment plants and in fuel fabrication facilities. Finally, we deal with the analytical procedures to characterize irradiated fuel and waste disposal of spent fuel. 

Water impedance - Once swollen by contact with water, a layer of smectite will prevent further passage of water. Smectites, particularly sodium bentonite, are therefore widely used to prevent seepage loss from ponds, ditches, reservoirs, and waste disposal areas, to line and waterproof tunnels and die below-grade walls of residential and commercial buildings, and to seal cracks and fissures in rocks and concrete. 

Prepare all solutions using deionized water and analytical grade reagents. Store all reagents at room temperature unless indicated otherwise. Strictly follow waste disposal regulations whenever applicable. 

Solids. Proper handling and disposal techniques can obviate potential problems associated with the soHd waste-retorted shale. Retorted shale disposal and revegetation have posed no adverse environmental impacts at the Unocal Parachute Project (62). EarHer studies carried out using Paraho and Lurgi retorted shales indicated that these materials behave as low grade cements (63,64) and can be engineered and compacted into high density materials (Pig. 11) and water impervious stmctures (Table 15). 

Essentially no waste products are formed ia the USP process if hydriodic acid and either sodium hydroxide or sodium carbonate are used as reactants. Water results from use of the former a mole equivalent quantity of carbon dioxide is produced from the latter reagents. Higher quaUty grades may require some purification steps which may result ia wastes from the treatment. Disposal of these impurities must then be carried out. 

It is most economical when high-grade ores are used, becoming less economical with poorer feed materials containing iron, because of the production of chloride wastes from which the chlorine cannot be recovered. By contrast the sulfate process cannot make use of rutile which does not dissolve in sulfuric acid, but is able to operate on lower grade ores. However, the capital cost of plant for the sulfate process is higher, and disposal of waste has proved environmentally more difficult, so that most new plant is designed for the chloride process. 

Other options for eliminating weapons-grade plutonium arc to seal it permanently in solid radioactive waste and dispose of it in waste repositories, and to use the plutonium to fuel fast neutron reactors (without reprocessing the plutonium into a MOX fuel). 

---