Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Viscosity flow models

Incorporation of viscosity variations in non-elastic generalized Newtonian flow models is based on using empirical rheological relationships such as the power law or Carreau equation, described in Chapter 1. In these relationships fluid viscosity is given as a function of shear rate and material parameters. Therefore in the application of finite element schemes to non-Newtonian flow, shear rate at the elemental level should be calculated and used to update the fluid viscosity. The shear rale is defined as the second invariant of the rate of deformation tensor as (Bird et at.., 1977)... [Pg.126]

The two-phase pressure drop was measured by Kawahara et al. (2002) in a circular tube of d = too pm. In Fig. 5.30, the data are compared with the homogeneous flow model predictions using the different viscosity models. It is clear that the agreement between the experimental data and homogeneous flow model is generally poor, with reasonably good predictions (within 20%) obtained only with the model from Dukler et al. (1964) for the mixture viscosity. [Pg.230]

Fig. 5.30 Comparison of the two-phase frictional pressure gradient between micro-channel data and homogeneous flow model predictions using different viscosity formulations. Reprinted from Kawahara et al. (2002) with permission... Fig. 5.30 Comparison of the two-phase frictional pressure gradient between micro-channel data and homogeneous flow model predictions using different viscosity formulations. Reprinted from Kawahara et al. (2002) with permission...
The Martinelli correlations for void fraction and pressure drop are used because of their simplicity and wide range of applicability. France and Stein (6 ) discuss the method by which the Martinelli gradient for two-phase flow can be incorporated into a choked flow model. Because the Martinelli equation balances frictional shear stresses cuid pressure drop, it is important to provide a good viscosity model, especially for high viscosity and non-Newtonian fluids. [Pg.332]

The next level of turbulence models introduces a transport equation to describe the variation of the turbulent viscosity throughout the flow domain. The simplest models in this category are the so-called one-equation models wherein the turbulent viscosity is modeled by... [Pg.134]

Durbin, P. A., N. N. Mansour, and Z. Yang (1994). Eddy viscosity transport model for turbulent flow. Physics of Fluids 6, 1007-1015. [Pg.412]

Taylor (T4, T6), in two other articles, used the dispersed plug-flow model for turbulent flow, and Aris s treatment also included this case. Taylor and Aris both conclude that an effective axial-dispersion coefficient Dzf can again be used and that this coefficient is now a function of the well known Fanning friction factor. Tichacek et al. (T8) also considered turbulent flow, and found that Dl was quite sensitive to variations in the velocity profile. Aris further used the method for dispersion in a two-phase system with transfer between phases (All), for dispersion in flow through a tube with stagnant pockets (AlO), and for flow with a pulsating velocity (A12). Hawthorn (H7) considered the temperature effect of viscosity on dispersion coefficients he found that they can be altered by a factor of two in laminar flow, but that there is little effect for fully developed turbulent flow. Elder (E4) has considered open-channel flow and diffusion of discrete particles. Bischoff and Levenspiel (B14) extended Aris s theory to include a linear rate process, and used the results to construct comprehensive correlations of dispersion coefficients. [Pg.135]

In the past, various resin flow models have been proposed [2,15-19], Two main approaches to predicting resin flow behavior in laminates have been suggested in the literature thus far. In the first case, Kardos et al. [2], Loos and Springer [15], Williams et al. [16], and Gutowski [17] assume that a pressure gradient develops in the laminate both in the vertical and horizontal directions. These approaches describe the resin flow in the laminate in terms of Darcy s Law for flow in porous media, which requires knowledge of the fiber network permeability and resin viscosity. Fiber network permeability is a function of fiber diameter, the porosity or void ratio of the porous medium, and the shape factor of the fibers. Viscosity of the resin is essentially a function of the extent of reaction and temperature. The second major approach is that of Lindt et al. [18] who use lubrication theory approximations to calculate the components of squeezing flow created by compaction of the plies. The first approach predicts consolidation of the plies from the top (bleeder surface) down, but the second assumes a plane of symmetry at the horizontal midplane of the laminate. Experimental evidence thus far [19] seems to support the Darcy s Law approach. [Pg.201]

Resin flow models are capable of determining the flow of resin through a porous medium (prepreg and bleeder), accounting for both vertical and horizontal flow. Flow models treat a number of variables, including fiber compaction, resin viscosity, resin pressure, number and orientation of plies, ply drop-off effects, and part size and shape. An important flow model output is the resin hydrostatic pressure, which is critical for determining void formation and growth. [Pg.301]

Research is currently being earned out for DIERS and in Europe to measure safety valve discharge coefficients for, two-phase flow, including high viscosity systems. Note that any two-phase discharge coefficient is the ratio of measured flow to flow calculated using a particular two-phase flow model. Discharge coefficients should therefore only be used with the flow model for which-they were derived. [Pg.92]

In the viscous-flow model, oxidation rate and viscosity are related through kf. [Pg.321]

A review by Bird and Wiest [6] gives a more complete list of existing viscoelastic models. The upper convective model and the White-Metzner model are very similar with the exception that the White-Metzner model incorporates the strain rate effects of the relaxation time and the viscosity. Both models provide a first order approximation to flows, in which shear rate dependence and memory effects are important. However, both models predict zero second normal stress coefficients. The Giesekus model is molecular-based, non-linear in nature and describes thepower law region for viscosity andboth normal stress coefficients. The Phan-Thien Tanner models are based on network theory and give non-linear stresses. Both the Giesekus and Phan-Thien Tanner models have been successfully used to model complex flows. [Pg.77]

For relatively porous nanofiltration membranes, simple pore flow models based on convective flow will be adapted to incorporate the influence of the parameters mentioned above. The Hagen-Poiseuille model and the Jonsson and Boesen model, which are commonly used for aqueous systems permeating through porous media, such as microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes, take no interaction parameters into account, and the viscosity as the only solvent parameter. It is expected that these equations will be insufficient to describe the performance of solvent resistant nanofiltration membranes. Machado et al. [62] developed a resistance-in-series model based on convective transport of the solvent for the permeation of pure solvents and solvent mixtures ... [Pg.53]

It must, of course, be clearly understood that e and e are not, like v and a, properties of the fluid involved alone but depend primarily on the turbulence structure at the point under consideration and hence on the mean velocity and temperature at this point and the derivatives of these quantities as well as on the type of flow being considered. The use of e and e does not, in itself, constitute the use of an empirical turbulence model. It is only when attempts are made to describe the variation of 6 and eh through the flow field on the basis of certain usually rather limited experimental measurements that the term eddy viscosity turbulence model is applicable. In fact, even when advanced turbulence models are used, it is often convenient to express the end results in terms of the eddy viscosity and eddy diffusivity. [Pg.230]

Because in the porous media flow model being used, the effects of viscosity are assumed to be negligible, the velocity will be uniform across the duct, i.e., the velocity will be equal to um everywhere and the cross-stream velocity component, v, will, therefore, be zero everywhere. It will further be assumed that the temperature gradients across the flow, i.e., in the v-direction, will be much greater than those in the z-direction because W < L, L being the length of the duct. With these assumptions, the governing equation, i.e., Eq. (10.34), reduces to ... [Pg.522]

In the past, various resin flow models have been proposed (2, 15-19). Two main approaches to predicting resin flow behavior in laminates have been suggested in the literature thus far. In the first case, Kardos et al.2), Loos and Springer15), Williams et al.16) and Gutowski17) assume that a pressure gradient develops in the laminate both in the vertical and horizontal directions. These approaches describe the resin flow in the laminate in terms of Darcy s Law for flow in porous media, which requires knowledge of the fiber network permeability and resin viscosity. Fiber... [Pg.119]

For the bulk polymerization of styrene using thermal initiation, the kinetic model of Hui and Hamielec (13) was used. The flow model (Harkness (1)) takes radial variations in temperature and concentration into account and the velocity profile was calculated at every axial point based on the radial viscosity at that point. The system equations were solved using the method of lines with a Gear routine for solving the resulting set of ordinary differential equations. [Pg.312]

A flow model may be considered to be a mathematical equation that can describe rheological data, such as shear rate versus shear stress, in a basic shear diagram, and that provides a convenient and concise manner of describing the data. Occasionally, such as for the viscosity versus temperature data during starch gelatinization, more than one equation may be necessary to describe the rheological data. In addition to mathematical convenience, it is important to quantify how magnitudes of model parameters are affected by state variables, such as temperature, and the effect of structure/composition (e.g., concentration of solids) of foods and establish widely applicable relationships that may be called functional models. [Pg.27]


See other pages where Viscosity flow models is mentioned: [Pg.7]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.817]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.805]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.404]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.552]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.79]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.68 ]




SEARCH



Flow models intrinsic viscosity

Flow models viscosity, rheological measurements

Viscosity modeling

Viscosity modelling

Viscosity models

Viscosity models model

© 2024 chempedia.info