Viral penetration

Viral infections continue to be significant causes of morbidity and mortality and at the same time continue to be resistant to treatment by small molecules. Avridine (6) is an antiviral compound which has shown some activity in a variety of animal tests apparently based upon its ability to stimulate a number of cells to produce the high molecular weight endogenous antiviral substance interferon. Thus, the compound is believed to operate indirectly by stimulating the body s own natural defenses against viral penetration into host cells. Avridine is synthesized by... 

Amantadine hydrochloride (Fig. 5.21A) does not prevent adsorphon but inhibits viral penetration. It has a very narrow spectrum and is used prophylachcally against infechon with influenza A vims it has no piophylachc value with other types of influenza... 

It consists primarily of IgG and contains trace amounts of IgA and IgM. y-Globulin provides the patient with passive immunity and does not require time for the development of an antibody response. It is believed to inhibit viral penetration of host cells, opsonize viral particles, activate complement, and stimulate cell-mediated immunity. 

A wide variety of methodologies and reagents are currently employed to introduce different molecules into eukaryotic cells. The incorporation of DNA can be achieved by two different mechanisms infection or transfection. The first consists of a biological process mediated by a virus (the viral infection of cells is mediated by receptors), while the second makes use of physical or biochemical methods to incorporate the DNA into the cell. Although the virus-mediated methods are more efficient, they are more laborious and time-consuming compared with transfection. Additionally, the nature of the infection process requires the presence of virus-specific receptors in the host cell to allow viral penetration, which restricts the spectrum of possible host cells. Another limitation of viral infection as a method for DNA transfer is that, unlike plasmid transfection, it is not possible to simultaneously transfer multiple recombinant viruses into the cell (Wurm and Bernard, 1999). 

Block viral penetration/uncoating Amantadine, rimantadine... 

Keywords Receptors Co-evolution Ligand-receptor interactions Promiscuity G protein-coupled receptors Viral penetration Chemokines Chemokine receptors Receptor coupling... 

Viral-encoded G-protein coupled receptor, 299 Viral penetration, 287 Virus, 305 Virus-receptor, 291... 

Viral infections are normally overcome by the patient s immune system. However, the advent of HIV infections and AIDS has led to the development of several new antiviral drugs. Antiviral drugs work by inhibiting the synthesis of viral DNA, RNA or proteins by reducing the release of viral genetic material inside host cells by interfering with viral penetration of host cell membranes and by interfering with attachment of virus to host... 

Amantadine HC1 (Symmetrel) (Fig. 7-16) appears to be an inhibitor of viral penetration or some other early step in the replicative cycle. This has been established with rubella... 

That viral penetration and uncoating are normal in the restricted system is indicated by 1) The irreversible eclipse of the virus, 2) the cessation of host protein sjmthesis, and 5) the simultaneous initiation of viral RNA synthesis in both permissive and restrictive hosts (24f 25). Indeed, no major differences occur (are detectable ) in the infected restrictive cell compared to the permissive host until four hours post-infection, at which time there appears to be a cessation of viral RNA accumulation. Initial data (25) supported the hypothesis that this was due to RNA degradation superimposed upon ongoing RNA synthesis. However, others in this laboratory have been unable to confirm this. 

Sensitivity of the assay (water-, air-, dye-leak tests, bacterial or viral penetration)... 

While many roles have been proposed quite early for viral sialidase (viral penetration into the host cell, provision of lower-molecular-weight metabolites for viral propagation, release of newly formed virus from the host cell, destruction of substances which protect the cell surface from virus binding, viral binding to the host cell surface by enzyme-substrate interaction), conflicting lines of evidence for each hypothesis have prevented the certain adoption of any of them. For details in an old and a new review, see those by Kelly (1963) and Drzeniek (1972). More recently Tsvetkova and Lipkind (1973) have suggested that the viral... 

---