Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Velocity limiter

In order to select the pipe size, the pressure loss is calculated and velocity limitations are estabHshed. The most important equations for calculation of pressure drop for single-phase (Hquid or vapor) Newtonian fluids (viscosity independent of the rate of shear) are those for the deterrnination of the Reynolds number, and the head loss, (16—18). [Pg.55]

In comparison, units that are designed with turbulent beds have a lower superficial velocity limit because of soflds entrainment and are unable to independently control the entrained soflds recycle. The soflds loading in the turbulent-bed regenerator configuration are equal to the reactor—regenerator circulation plus the entrained soflds via the cyclone diplegs. [Pg.216]

Maintenance records also supply valuable rules for things such as heat exchanger tube velocity limitations for... [Pg.402]

This is a low value, therefore, the possibility exists of an up-rate relative to any nozzle flow limits. At this point, a comment or two is in order. There is a rule of thumb that sets inlet nozzle velocity limit at approximately 100 fps. But because the gases used in the examples have relatively high acoustic velocities, they will help illustrate how this limit may be extended. Regardless of the method being used to extend the velocity, a value of 150 fps should be considered maximum. When the sonic velocity of a gas is relatively low, the method used in this example may dictate a velocity for the inlet nozzle of less than 100 fps. The pressure drop due to velocity head loss of the original design is calculated as follows ... [Pg.39]

Fig. 3.6. The accelerations achieved at low pressure with waves transmitted through various thicknesses of fused quartz (GE 151 and Dynasil 1000) have been carefully studied and can serve as standard loadings (after Graham [79G02]). Recent data from Smith [92S01] also show the particle velocity limit for the linear acceleration to be 0.11 kms ... Fig. 3.6. The accelerations achieved at low pressure with waves transmitted through various thicknesses of fused quartz (GE 151 and Dynasil 1000) have been carefully studied and can serve as standard loadings (after Graham [79G02]). Recent data from Smith [92S01] also show the particle velocity limit for the linear acceleration to be 0.11 kms ...
Moore s equation was derived from fragments accelerated from high explosives packed in a casing. Baum (1984) showed, in comparing different models, that the Moore equation tends to follow the theoretical upper-velocity limit for high scaled energies. [Pg.319]

The calculation of nozzle connections has not been demonstrated, but normally follows line sizing practice, or some special velocity limitation, depending upon nozzle purpose. [Pg.215]

Oxygen enrichment. In a cat cracker, which is either air blower or regenerator velocity limited, enrichment of the regenerator air can increase capacity or conversion provided there is good air/ catalyst distribution and that the extra oxygen does not just burn CO to CO2. [Pg.204]

The tube-side inlet to an exchanger, i.e. the tube ends, is a highly turbulent region and nylon ferrules in the tube ends of the inlet pass have been used in cupro-nickel-tubed condensers to prevent erosion. Where the flow is two phase the same rules will apply except that an erosion velocity limit is more difficult to specify. [Pg.25]

Incompressible Limit In order to obtain the more familiar form of the Navier-Stokes equations (9.16), we take the low-velocity (i,e. low Mach number M = u I /cs) limit of equation 9,104, We also take a cue from the continuous case, where, if the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations are derived via a Mach-number expansion of the full compressible equations, density variations become negligible everywhere except in the pressure term [frisch87]. Thus setting p = peq + p and allowing density fluctuations only in the pressure term, the low-velocity limit of equation 9,104 becomes... [Pg.501]

Thus it is seen that the laminar flame is stabilized on burners only within certain flow velocity limits. The following subsections treat the physical picture just given in more detail. [Pg.203]

Clever schemes have been developed to treat the Barkas-Andersen effect for light ions in an electron gas ([27,34] and others) in what is called the nonlinear quantum regime. While there is little doubt that there must be a lower velocity limit for the validity of Bohr-like stopping theory, a reliable estimate of this limit does not seem available, nor is there a demonstration of where and in what manner quantum mechanics is an indispensable feature. [Pg.101]

For air and water, in a one inch tube, the superficial gas velocity limits for the film suspension region were about 31 ft./sec. to 41 ft./sec. (see Fig. 10 also). The value of 31 ft./sec. agrees with the value to be expected for the critical gas flooding velocity at zero liquid flow from an extrapolation of the results of Nicklin and Davidson. Hence, the approach of the latter workers in their analysis of unstable slug flow would seem to be valid for net liquid flows down to zero. [Pg.241]

The discussion in the previous section suggests that the track of a heavy ion becomes more like that of a fast electron with increasing velocity. Therefore one expects that in the high velocity limit the yields of water products with heavy ions are the same as with fast electrons or y-rays. The yields for the major products of water radiolysis in fast electron or y-radiolysis are given in Table 1. These values were taken from a number of different sources in conjunction with the results predicted by model calculations [73,116,119-123]. Material balance shows that almost four molecules of water are decomposed for every 100 eV of energy absorbed by fast electrons or y-rays. Because only about six water molecules are initially decomposed, most of the water products escape intraspur reactions in fast electron or y-radiolysis. [Pg.418]

The submergence of suction line water intakes in the basin should be such as to avoid vortex formation and, consequently, air entrainments. Figure 7.1 provides recommended minimum submergence depths for different fluid velocities. In some cases it may be impractical to adhere to these velocity limitations, and higher suction velocities must be accepted. In such cases, a vortex breaker can be employed (Figure 7.2). [Pg.164]

Although these are the equations that we would right down from first principles in a Newtonian analysis, they are also the small-scale and small-velocity limit of General Relativity. To account for the expansion of the Universe, we change to comoving coordinates, r and peculiar velocity, u, defined from physical coordinates, x, and velocities, v as... [Pg.181]

This equation also works effectively over a limited range, but removal of the summation from the coupling term gives a somewhat too abrupt transition from the low velocity limit (Cmv) to the high velocity limit (A). This abruptness can be moderated by replacing Cmv with Cmv0 3 [3]. [Pg.271]

Fig. 4 General solution for the dispersion equation on water at 25 °C. The damping coefficient a vs. the real capillary wave frequency o> , for isopleths of constant dynamic dilation elasticity ed (solid radial curves), and dilational viscosity k (dashed circular curves). The plot was generated for a reference subphase at k = 32431 m 1, ad = 71.97 mN m-1, /i = 0mNsm 1, p = 997.0kgm 3, jj = 0.894mPas and g = 9.80ms 2. The limits correspond to I = Pure Liquid Limit, II = Maximum Velocity Limit for a Purely Elastic Surface Film, III = Maximum Damping Coefficient for the same, IV = Minimum Velocity Limit, V = Surface Film with an Infinite Lateral Modulus and VI = Maximum Damping Coefficient for a Perfectly Viscous Surface Film... Fig. 4 General solution for the dispersion equation on water at 25 °C. The damping coefficient a vs. the real capillary wave frequency o> , for isopleths of constant dynamic dilation elasticity ed (solid radial curves), and dilational viscosity k (dashed circular curves). The plot was generated for a reference subphase at k = 32431 m 1, ad = 71.97 mN m-1, /i = 0mNsm 1, p = 997.0kgm 3, jj = 0.894mPas and g = 9.80ms 2. The limits correspond to I = Pure Liquid Limit, II = Maximum Velocity Limit for a Purely Elastic Surface Film, III = Maximum Damping Coefficient for the same, IV = Minimum Velocity Limit, V = Surface Film with an Infinite Lateral Modulus and VI = Maximum Damping Coefficient for a Perfectly Viscous Surface Film...
Derjaguin transform from full Lifshitz result, including retardation C.l.a. Force per unit length C.l.b. Free energy of interaction per unit length C.l.c.l. Nonretarded (infinite light velocity) limit C.l.c.2. Cylinders of equal radii C.l.c.3. Cylinder with a plane... [Pg.391]

C.2.b. Free energy per interaction C.2.c. Nonretarded (infinite light velocity) limit C.2.d. Light velocities taken everywhere equal to that in the medium, small Aji, Aji, q = 1 C.2.e. Hamaker-Lifshitz hybrid form C.3. Two parallel cylinders... [Pg.391]

The superscript 0 indicates that the mass is in the low velocity limit. The value of m comes out to be 5me where me is the mass of the free electron. [Pg.24]

The erosion resistance of copper alloy condenser tubes can be related directly to velocity. The velocity limits for common copper base alloys are shown in Figure 1.18. The velocity limit is roughly proportional to the strength of the alloy (i.e., copper is the weakest material and displays the poorest erosion resistance) copper-30% nickel is one of the strongest alloys and displays the best erosion resistance. [Pg.16]

Valves <80 to 108 Avoid sonic velocities, limit pressure drop, and mass flow, replace with special low noise valves, vibration isolation and lagging. [Pg.90]


See other pages where Velocity limiter is mentioned: [Pg.54]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.447]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.410]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.1037]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.537]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.531]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.360]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.119 ]




SEARCH



Decanters inlet velocity limit

Limiting migration velocity

Limiting pressure-velocity

Limiting velocity

Limiting velocity

Limiting-phonon velocity

Nonrelativistic limit velocity operator

Point versus Full Field Velocity Measurement Techniques Advantages and Limitations

Pressure drop, limiting velocity and calculation of column dimensions

Slurry line limit deposit velocity

Sonic velocity limiting factor

Velocity limit

Velocity limit

Velocity limiting liquid

Velocity — Critical and Limiting Diameter Relationships

© 2024 chempedia.info