Variational boundary perturbation

J. Gorecki, W. Byers-Brown, Variational boundary perturbation theory for enclosed quantum systems, J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 22 (17) (1989) 2659-2668. 

Gorecki and Byers Brown [14,15] proposed an approach based on the variational boundary perturbation theory. In this method the trial wave function for the confined system / is constructed as the product of the wave function for the free (unbounded) system /, times a non-singular cut off function /, to ensure fulfillment of the boundary condition /(ro, cp, 0) = 0. The cut-off function clearly vanishes at ro, /(ro) = 0... 

Moet H.J.K. (1982) Asymptotic analysis of the boundary in singularly perturbed elliptic variational inequalities. Lect. Notes Math. 942, 1-17. 

VVe say that a scheme is stable with respect to coefficients (costable) if a solution of the boundary-value problem has slight variations under small perturbations of the scheme coefficients. In order to avoid misunderstanding, we focus our attention on the scheme with coefficients a, d, ip... 

Besides the remarkable directionality of the motion, the images also demonstrate a periodic variation of the cluster from an elongated to a circular shape (Fig. 39). The diagrams in Fig. 39 depict the time dependence of the displacement and the cluster size. Until the cluster was finally trapped, the speed remained fairly constant as can be seen from the constant slope in Fig. 39 a. The oscillatory variation of the cluster shape is shown in Fig. 39b. Although a coarse model for the motion has been presented in Fig. 39, the actual cause of the motion remains unknown. The ratchet model proposed by J. Frost requires a non-equiUb-rium variation in the energetic potential to bias the Brownian motion of a molecule or particle under anisotropic boundary conditions [177]. Such local perturbations of the molecular structure are believed to be caused by the mechanical contact with the scaiming tip. A detailed and systematic study of this question is still in progress. 

Because of interelectronic repulsions, the Schrodinger equation for many-electron atoms and molecules cannot be solved exactly. The two main approximation methods used are the variation method and perturbation theory. The variation method is based on the following theorem. Given a system with time-independent Hamiltonian //, then if

well-behaved function that satisfies the boundary conditions of the problem, one can show (by expanding

[Pg.271]

The basis set representing the first order perturbed orbitals should also be chosen such that it satisfies the imposed finite boundary conditions and can be represented by a form like Equation (36) with the STOs having different sets of linear variation parameters and preassigned exponents. The coefficients of the perturbed functions are determined through the optimization of a standard variational functional with respect to, the total wavefunction . The frequency dependent response properties of the systems are analyzed by considering a time-averaged functional [155]... 

We consider spherical particles, and, without loss of generality, the fixed charge in the membrane is assumed to be negative. For simplicity, we assume that the distribution of fixed charge is uniform. The variation of the electrical potential is governed by Eq. (1) with m = 2, and the boundary conditions described by Eqs. (2)-(5). We use the approximate perturbation solution expressed by Eqs. (37) and (38)-(40). Suppose that the membrane is thick, and i Don and [/d are related by Eq. (48). 

There are a number of perturbations of these boundary conditions that can be applied. The dispersion coefficient can take on different values in each of the three regions (z < 0 0 z L, and z > 0) and the tracer can also be injected at some point Zi rather than at the boundary, z = 0. These cases and others can be foimd in the supplementary readings cited at the end of the chapter. We shall consider the case when there is no variation in the dispersion coefficient for all z and an impulse of tracer is injected at z = 0 at t = 0. 

The fact that a local maximum in area occurs at // = 0 in each family is not predicted by any known theorem. Schwarz (1890, vol. I, p. 150) showed that under the orthogonality boundary conditions, the second variation of the area is negative for a minimal surface bounded by the planes of a tetrahedron, but this only means that some normal perturbation which preserves the orthogonality boundary conditions decreases the area, and... 

In the context of the Wigner-Seitz theory, in 1937 Brillouin [7] gave a formal analysis of the atomic energy variations under boundary deformations using contact coordinate transformations that transform the boundary modifications into Hamiltonian transformations for a fixed region and generate the associated commutation relations. This allows application of the usual form of perturbation theory for the problem. 

Such a Fermi level shift can result in effects which can easily be confused with capacitive effects . These effects are called by the electrochemists, pseudo-capacitive effects. In solid state electrochemistry they are sometimes also described as an adsorption with partial transfer. To illustrate the point, let us consider the schematic situation depicted in Fig.6, It is familiar to electrochemists. Without entering into the details of the relevant surface levels and densities, we can say, from a thermodynamical viewpoint, that the electrode measures the chemical activity of 0 atoms in a perturbed layer located at the phase boundary. The electrode potential variations are related to the 0-chemical-activity-variations by formula (22). Extending the hypotheses, here, the 0 atoms are supposed to be soluble in the electronic conductor but the direct exchange of oxide ions is regarded as impossible. 

The numerical estimates show that in the case of variational determination of one-electron states the effect of the boundary (besides electrostatic, van-der-Waals etc. contributions) can be considered as a relatively weak perturbation. 

The detection of gas analytes using acoustic wave (AW) sensors can be based on changes in one or more of the physical characteristics of a thin film or layer in contact with the device surface (Ballantine et al. 1997). Some of the intrinsic film properties that can be utilized for gas detection include mass/ area, elastic stiffness (modulus), viscoelasticity, viscosity, electrical conductivity, and permittivity. Variations in any of these parameters alter the mechanical and/or electrical boundary conditions producing a measurable shift in the propagating acoustic wave phase velocity, v . Equation (13.1) illustrates the change in acoustic phase velocity, Av, as a result of external perturbations, assuming that the perturbations are small and linearly combined (Ippolito et al. 2009) ... 

---