Vapor toxic release

Vapor cloud explosions. Explosions which occur in the open air are vapor cloud explosions. A vapor cloud explosion is one of the most serious hazards in the process industries. Although a large toxic release may have a greater disaster potential, vapor cloud explosions tend to occur more frequently. Most vapor cloud explosions have been the result of leaks of flashing flammable liquids. 

TRACE II Toxic Release Analysis of Chemical Emissions Safer Emergency Systems, Inc. Darlene Davis Dave Dillehay 756 Lakefield Road Westlake Villa, CA 91361 (818) 707-2777 Models toxic gas and flammable vapor cloud dispersion. Intended for risk assessment and planning purposes, rather than realtime emergencies. 

Event 3 Toxic Release (hydrofluoric acid vapor cloud)—Refinery. Marathon Refinery, Texas City, Texas (October 30, 1987). 4,000 people evacuated and more than 1,000 treated for injuries (Health and Safety Executive [UK] 2008a). 

Gasoline vapors will also be released from soil at the site contaminated by spillage of gasoline (Kramer 1989). Gasoline is not listed on the Toxics Release Inventory however, several of the component hydrocarbons are listed. Refer to the ATSDR toxicological profiles for benzene, toluene, xylene, and ethylbenzene (ATSDR 1989, 1990, 1991) for information on these individual hydrocarbon components of gasoline. 

Incident The loss of containment of material or energy (e.g., a prmcture or fittings leak of ammonia on a railcar). Not all events propagate into incidents. Incident Outcome The physical manifestation of the incident for toxic materials, the incident outcome is a toxic release, while for flammable materials, the incident outcome could be a boihng liqtrid expanding vapor explosion (BLEVE), flash fire, vapor cloud explosion (VCE), etc. (e.g., for a leak of chlorine from a railcar, the incident outcome is a toxic release). Likelihood A measure of the expected probability or frequency of occurrence of an event (e.g., events/year). 

When a toxic gas or vapor is released to the atmosphere, the chemical will eventually disperse and reach some concentration at which the risk to the general population is minimal. A major and controversial part of the emergency planning process is establishing guidelines as to what these concentrations or levels of concern should be and duration. These information is used for determining when to evacuate or in some instances when to advise people to stay indoors with windows closed until the danger has passed. 

Escape from a vapor doud release is primarily associated with toxic releases. Flammable clouds exist within shorter distances from the source and if ignited present thermal and blast effect beyond the initial cloud dimensions. There is usually very litde reaction time in flammable releases that ignite. This chapter applies to toxic releases only. 

Figure 1. Comparison of major accidents in Middle Eastern case (blue) with world accidents (red) in the oil and gas industry percentages of different scenarios. (LOCA Loss of containment F Fire EX Explosion BLEVE boiling liquid expanding vapor explosion IE internal explosion TOX toxic release VCE vapor cloud explosion VCF vapor cloud fire VEEB vapor escape into, and explosion in, building, B blowout).

In Stage 2, the buildings that met the previous screening criteria are evaluated with consequence modeling for vapor cloud explosion and toxic release hazards. If the team determines that a building(s) has a sufficient hazard, then a Stage 3 is justified. 

In preliminary process design, the primary consideration is contact by inhalation. This happens either through accidental release of toxic material to the atmosphere or the fugitive emissions caused by slow leakage from pipe flanges, valve glands, and pump and compressor seals. Tank filling causes emissions when the rise in liquid level causes vapor in the tank to be released to the atmosphere. 

On the other hand, if the hazard is toxicity, process alternatives can be compared by assessing the mass of toxic material that would enter the vapor phase on release from containment, weighting the components according to their lethal concentration. 

This recommended practice is intended to apply to faciUties that (/) handle or store flammable or explosive substances in such a manner that a release of ca 5 t of gas or vapor could occur in a few minutes and (2) handle toxic substances. The threshold quantity for the toxic materials would be determined using engineering judgment and dispersion modeling, based on a potential for serious danger as a result of exposures of <1 h. 

The surface area of a spill should be minimized for materials that are highly toxic and have a significant vapor pressure at ambient conditions, such as acrylonitrile or chlorine. This will make it easier and more practical to collect vapor from a spill or to suppress vapor release with foam. This may require a deeper nondrained dike area than normal or some other design that wilfminimize surface area, in order to contain the required volume. It is usually not desirable to cover a diked area to restric t loss of vapor if the spill consists of a flammable or combustible material. 

Since discharges of vapors from highly hazardous toxic materials cannot simply be released to the atmosphere, the use of a weak seam roof is not normally acceptable. It is best that tanks be designed and stamped for 15 psig to provide maximum safety, and pressure relief systems must be provided to vent to equipment that can collect, contain, and treat the effluent. 

Introduction Gas dispersion (or vapor dispersion) is used to determine the consequences of a release of a toxic or flammable material. Typically, the calculations provide an estimate of the area affected and the average vapor concentrations expected. In order to make this determination, one must know the release rate of the gas (or the total quantity released) and the atmospheric conditions (wind speed, time of day, cloud cover). 

Uncontrolled release of flammable, toxic, or environmentally detrimental vapors from atmospheric vents. 

Hydrogen sulfide is a commonly occurring decomposition product of organic matter. It is relatively water soluble at higher pHs where it is predominantly dissociated as and S ions. As the pH is decreased below 7, undissociated gas HjS begins to predominate and is released. Since its vapor density is > 1.0, HjS gas tends to settle in low places and creates a toxicity hazard. H S is readily oxidizable by a number of means to less toxic SO3" or 804 forms. 

---