Valves storage tanks

Products section—solids feeders, compressor, pipes, valves, storage tanks Packing and transportation section—bags, boxes, railroad, truck... 

Risk level III, classified as high, was found in the nodes one, four, five and six. The deviations that produce this type of risk levels are mostly related to possible ruptures in pipes, valves, storage tanks and injuries to the workers that can occur from the operation. 

Solids materials that are insoluble in hydrocarbon or water can be entrained in the crude. These are called bottom sediments and comprise fine particles of sand, drilling mud, rock such as feldspar and gypsum, metals in the form of minerals or in their free state such as iron, copper, lead, nickel, and vanadium. The latter can come from pipeline erosion, storage tanks, valves and piping systems, etc. whatever comes in contact with the crude oil. 

As for storage tanks, stainless steel and lacquer-lined mild steel are suitable materials of constmction for pipe lines. For pumps, valves, etc, various alloys are suitable, including phosphor bronze, gun metal. Monel, stainless steel, and certain nickel steel alloys. Alloys with high proportions of ziac and tin together with copper and aluminum are not recommended. 

Pressure-Vacuum Relief Valves For apphcations involving atmospheric and low-pressure storage tanks, pressure-vacuum relief valves (PVRVs) are used to provide pressure relief. These units combine both a pressure and a vacuum relief valve into a single assembly that mounts on a nozzle on top of the tank and are usually sized to handle the normal in-breathing and out-breathing requirements. For emergency pressure rehef situations (e.g., fire), ERVs are used. API RP 520 and API STD 2000 can be used as references for sizing. 

While either rupture disks or relief valves are allowed on storage tanks by Code, rupture disks by themselves should not be used on tanks for the storage of highly hazardous toxic materials since they do not close after opening and may lead to continuing release of toxic material to the atmosphere. 

In the cathodic protection of storage tanks, potentials should be measured in at least three places, i.e., at each end and at the top of the cover [16]. Widely different polarized areas arise due to the small distance which is normally the case between the impressed current anodes and the tank. Since such tanks are often buried under asphalt, it is recommended that permanent reference electrodes or fixed measuring points (plastic tubes under valve boxes) be installed. These should be located in areas not easily accessible to the cathodic protection current, for example between two tanks or between the tank wall and foundations. Since storage tanks usually have several anodes located near the tank, equalizing currents can flow between the differently loaded anodes on switching off the protection system and thus falsify the potential measurement. In such cases the anodes should be separated. 

Provision of operating instructions and procedures. These should eliminate confusion and provide continuity on, e.g., shift changeover. EiTors in identification of valves, pumps, pipes, storage tanks, and the sequence in which they are to be operated is a common cause of accidents, e.g. on staff changeovers. 

Cone roof attnospheric storage tanks must be provided with either a pressure-vacuum valve or an open vent, depending upon the flash point of the stored product. 

We put a lot of effort into improving safety by adding protective equipment onto our plants, new and old gas detectors, emergency isolation valves, interlocks, steam curtains, fire insulation, catchment pits for LPG storage tanks, and so on. We also introduced new procedures, such as hazard and operability studies and modification control, or persuaded people to follow old ones, such as permits-to-work and audits. 

Many leaks have been discussed under other headings, including leaks that occurred during maintenance (Chapter 1), as the result of human error (Chapter 3), or as the result of overfilling storage tanks (Section 5.1). Other leaks have occurred as the result of pipe or vessel failures (Chapter 9), while leaks of liquefied flammable gas are discussed in Chapter 8 and leaks from pumps and relief valves in Chapter 10. 

Many leaks have occurred because workers left drain valves open while draining water from storage tanks or process equipment and then returned to find that oil was running out instead of water. 

A more serious incident occurred at a plant in which ethylene oxide and aqueous ammonia were reacted to produce ethanolamine. Some ammonia got back into the ethylene oxide storage tank, past several check valves in series and a positive pump. It got past the pump through the relief valve, which discharged into the pump suction line. The ammonia reacted with 30 m of ethylene oxide in the storage tank. There w as a violent rupture of the tank, followed by an explosion of the vapor cloud, which caused damage and destruction over a wide area [4],... 

The immediate cause of the disaster was the contamination of an MIC storage tank by several tons of water and chloroform. A runaway reaction occurred, and the temperature and pressure rose. The relief valve lifted, and MIC vapor was discharged to atmosphere. The protective equipment, which should have prevented or minimized the release, was out of order or not in full working order the refrigeration system that should have cooled the storage tank was shut down, the scrubbing system that should have absorbed the vapor was not immediately available, and the flare system that should have burned any vapor that got past the scrubbing system was out of use. 

The incidents described could occur in many different types of plants and are therefore of widespread interest. Some of them illustrate the hazards involved in activities such as preparing equipment for maintenance and modifying plants. Others illustrate the hazards associated with widely used equipment, such as storage tanks and hoses, and with that universal component of all plants and processes people. Other incidents illustrate the need for techniques, such as hazard and operability studies, and protective devices, such as emergency isolation valves. 

A credible spill for Catastrophic Loss Potential. For a catastrophic loss potential, the spill size should be based on the contents of vessels or connected vessel train. The existence of shutoff valves between vessels should not be considered. In addition, the catastrophic failure of major storage tanks should be considered. Leaks in pipelines carrying materials of concern from large-capacity, off-site, remote storage facilities must be considered. For this purpose, it must be assumed that the pipeline is completely severed and that the spill will run for 30 minutes. 

In a resin plant, solvents were directed from storage tanks to a blender by means of solvent charging manifold. Because of the poor panel layout and labeling of the charging manifold, a worker made connections that pumped solvent to blender 21A instead of 12A as directed by the instructions. An earlier error had left the valve open from the charging manifold to blender 21A and hence the misdirected solvent degraded a batch already in the blender (this example will be analyzed in more detail in Chapter 7). 

The system is a storage tank designed to hold a flammable liquid under a low positive nitrogen pressure (see Figure 5.1). This pressure is controlled by PICA-1. A relief valve is fitted which operates if overpressurization occurs. Liquid is fed to the tank from a tank truck, and is subsequently supplied to the process by the pump P-1. 

Number of days since last accidental release of hazardous material. This measure distinguishes between routine emissions (such as from storage tank vents, or low pressure steam discharges) and accidental emissions resulting from maloperation or breakdown. Events that might count would be safety valve releases, accidental releases into inappropriate drainage systems and unconfmed spills during maintenance. 

---