Value disciplines

Values Discipline Opportunity Standards Measurement Leadership Service Trust Communications Integrity Resomces Respect Resources Application Character Selfless Pride Consequences... 

Treacy, M. and Weisma, E. (1993), Customer intimacy and other value discipline. Harvard Business Review, January-Eebruary. 

Evaluate Treacy and Wiersema s value disciplines based on Porter s views on differentiating strategies (section 1.4.3). 

The phase rule specifies the number of intensive properties of a system that must be set to estabUsh all other intensive properties at fixed values (3), without providing information about how to calculate values for these properties. The field of appHed engineering thermodynamics has grown out of the need to assign numerical values to thermodynamic properties within the constraints of the phase rule and fundamental laws. In the engineering disciplines there is a particular demand for physical properties, both for pure fluids and mixtures, and for phase equiUbrium data (4,5). 

Unless some discipline is imposed, engineering personnel, especially where contractors are involved, will define far more alarms than plant operations require. This situation may be addressed by simply setting the alarm hmits to values such that the alarms never occur. However, changes in alarms and alarm hmits are changes from the perspec tive of the Process Safety Management regulations. It is prudent to impose the necessary discipline to avoid an excessive number of alarms. Potential guidelines are as follows ... 

Another measure of the importance of a scientific discipline is its contributions to technology. In this arena, the study of particle adhesion has a long list of accomplishments and is expected to continue to add value in a variety of industries. 

Thermodynamic, statistical This discipline tries to compute macroscopic properties of materials from more basic structures of matter. These properties are not necessarily static properties as in conventional mechanics. The problems in statistical thermodynamics fall into two categories. First it involves the study of the structure of phenomenological frameworks and the interrelations among observable macroscopic quantities. The secondary category involves the calculations of the actual values of phenomenology parameters such as viscosity or phase transition temperatures from more microscopic parameters. With this technique, understanding general relations requires only a model specified by fairly broad and abstract conditions. Realistically detailed models are not needed to un-... 

The use of stress terminology has been discussed in Chapter 1, where it was pointed out that the value of the term stress in indicating some adverse force or influence lies in its extreme generality, without the need for a precise quantification. Nevertheless it is appropriate that a scientific discipline should be concerned with definable quantities. This will be the starting point for this paper, which will follow the example of Levitt (1972) who applied the concepts and terminology of mechanical stress (force per unit area) and strain (a definable dimension change) to the study of plant responses to the environment. This approach will be developed here in an attempt to incorporate the philosophies behind stress effects into a general treatment of the responses of ecosystems to adverse environmental conditions. 

The theories on individual decision making from other scientific disciplines tend to stress factors such as status, social peer pressure, time availability, mood, cultural aspects, self-affirmation, altruism, and self-perception, as explanatory variables to decision making [12, 13]. These latter factors are far less favourable for economic valuation since the value would be unpredictable and varying dependent on situation. They may, however, provide an equally or even better description of decision making. 

For chemistry as a whole, and for each of these chemical disciplines, there developed a historical (indeed, genealogical) legacy and a core literature, as well as a set of shared problems, practices, principles, and values. Thomas Kuhn has treated such disciplinary components as categories of the "paradigm" or the "disciplinary matrix," which are useful in understanding normal science before its transformation during a period of revolution.5 My concern is not revolution but the evolution of eighteenth-century chemical philosophy, whose practitioners aspired to understand the dynamics of matter, into twentieth-century theoretical chemistry, whose practitioners claimed to do so. 

The first premise is that we risk overlooking the crux of a scientific discipline if we do not understand the discipline s values and problems. These provide a unity that no merely institutional history can explain. The second premise is that a programmatic conceptual core of chemical thought from the eighteenth century through the twentieth century was what I call the problem of the dynamics of matter (What holds a substance together What makes it change ). An early expression for this problem of dynamics was the concept of "chemical affinity."... 

---