Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Upper critical solution temperature system

It should be noted that the modern view is that all partially miscible liquids should have both a lower and upper critical solution temperature so that all such systems really belong to one class. A closed solubility curve is not obtain in all cases because the physical conditions under normal pressure prevent this. Thus with liquids possessing a lower C.S.T., the critical temperature (the critical point for the liquid vapour system for each component, the maximum temperature at which liquefaction is possible) may be reached before the consolute temperature. Similarly for liquids with an upper C.S.T., one or both of the liquids may freeze before the lower C.S.T. is attained. [Pg.19]

A few systems with both lower and upper critical solution temperatures are tabulated below., ... [Pg.20]

The Class I binary diagram is the simplest case (see Fig. 6a). The P—T diagram consists of a vapor—pressure curve (soHd line) for each pure component, ending at the pure component critical point. The loci of critical points for the binary mixtures (shown by the dashed curve) are continuous from the critical point of component one, C , to the critical point of component two,Cp . Additional binary mixtures that exhibit Class I behavior are CO2—/ -hexane and CO2—benzene. More compHcated behavior exists for other classes, including the appearance of upper critical solution temperature (UCST) lines, two-phase (Hquid—Hquid) immiscihility lines, and even three-phase (Hquid—Hquid—gas) immiscihility lines. More complete discussions are available (1,4,22). Additional simple binary system examples for Class III include CO2—hexadecane and CO2—H2O Class IV, CO2—nitrobenzene Class V, ethane—/ -propanol and Class VI, H2O—/ -butanol. [Pg.222]

Using the estimated interaction parameters phase equilibrium computations were performed. It was found that the EoS is able to represent the VL2E behavior of the methane-n-hexane system in the temperature range of 198.05 to 444.25 K reasonably well. Typical results together with the experimental data at 273.16 and 444.25 K are shown in Figures 14.14 and 14.15 respectively. However, the EoS was found to be unable to correlate the entire phase behavior in the temperature range of 195.91 K (Upper Critical Solution Temperature) and 182.46K (Lower Critical Solution Temperature). [Pg.261]

The lower critical solution temperature is another crucial polymer property, which, together with the Upper Critical Solution Temperature (UCST), defines fhe fwo solubility boundaries of polymers in solution. Typically, systems are completely miscible below the LCST but only partially miscible above the LCST and completely immiscible above the UCST. [Pg.139]

The instance we have considered here, that of a polymer in a poor solvent, results in an upper critical solution temperature (UCST) as shown in Figure 2.33. This occurs due to (a) decreased attractive forces between like molecules at higher temperatures and (b) increased solubility. For some systems, however, a decrease in solubility can occur, and the corresponding critical temperature is located at the minimum of the miscibility curve, resulting in a lower critical solution temperature (LCST). This situation is illustrated in Figure 2.34. [Pg.196]

The cloud point curves of the epoxy monomer/PEI blend and BPACY monomer/PEI blend exhibited an upper critical solution temperature (UCST) behavior, whereas partially cured epoxy/PEI blend and BPACY/PEI blend showed bimodal UCST curves with two critical compositions, ft is attributed to the fact that, at lower conversion, thermoset resin has a bimodal distribution of molecular weight in which unreacted thermoset monomer and partially reacted thermoset dimer or trimer exist simultaneously. The rubber/epoxy systems that shows bimodal UCST behavior have been reported in previous papers [40,46]. Figure 3.7 shows the cloud point curve of epoxy/PEI system. With the increase in conversion (molecular weight) of epoxy resin, the bimodal UCST curve shifts to higher temperature region. [Pg.118]

Interactions between different distant parts of the molecule tend to expand it, so that in the absence of other effects a would be greater than unity, but in solution in poor solvents interactions with the solvent tend to contract it. According to Flory s theory (18) these two tendencies will just balance so that a — 1 at a particular temperature T—0 (the theta temperature ), and at this temperature A2 =0 and further this temperature is the limit as Mn- go of the upper critical solution temperature for the polymer-solvent system in question. Quantities relating to T=0 will be denoted by subscript 0. Flory s theory implies that ... [Pg.9]

The phase behaviour of many polymer-solvent systems is similar to type IV and type HI phase behaviour in the classification of van Konynenburg and Scott [5]. In the first case, the most important feature is the presence of an Upper Critical Solution Temperature (UCST) and a Lower Critical Solution Temperature (LCST). The UCST is the temperature at which two liquid phases become identical (critical) if the temperature is isobarically increased. The LCST is the temperature at which two liquid phases critically merge if the system temperature is isobarically reduced. At temperatures between the UCST and the LCST a single-phase region is found, while at temperatures lower than the UCST and higher than the LCST a liquid-liquid equilibrium occurs. Both the UCST and the LCST loci end in a critical endpoint, the point of intersection of the critical curve and the liquid liquid vapour (hhg) equilibrium line. In the two intersection points the two liquid phases become critical in the presence of a... [Pg.50]

In a blend of immiscible homopolymers, macrophase separation is favoured on decreasing the temperature in a blend with an upper critical solution temperature (UCST) or on increasing the temperature in a blend with a lower critical solution temperature (LCST). Addition of a block copolymer leads to competition between this macrophase separation and microphase separation of the copolymer. From a practical viewpoint, addition of a block copolymer can be used to suppress phase separation or to compatibilize the homopolymers. Indeed, this is one of the main applications of block copolymers. The compatibilization results from the reduction of interfacial tension that accompanies the segregation of block copolymers to the interface. From a more fundamental viewpoint, the competing effects of macrophase and microphase separation lead to a rich critical phenomenology. In addition to the ordinary critical points of macrophase separation, tricritical points exist where critical lines for the ternary system meet. A Lifshitz point is defined along the line of critical transitions, at the crossover between regimes of macrophase separation and microphase separation. This critical behaviour is discussed in more depth in Chapter 6. [Pg.9]

For salts with univalent ions, Eq. (4) predicts critical points near room temperature for systems with e 5 [72]. Liquid-liquid immiscibilities in several electrolyte solutions are known to satisfy this criterion [5, 71, 72]. Note that these gaps do not necessarily possess an upper critical solution temperature (UCST). Theory can rationalize a lower critical solution temperature (LCST) as well, if the product esT decreases with increasing temperature. [Pg.9]

Thus, as noted above, the entropy of mixing is the key quantity for the system to show an LCST. At an upper critical solution temperature, UCST, an important condition is that expressed in (31). [Pg.285]

Not all systems behave as described in the preceding paragraphs. Some the upper critical solution temperature is never attained, because a vapor/F critical temperature is reached first. In other cases the liquid solubilities in" with a decrease in temperature. In this event a lower critical solution tempo exists, unless solid phases appear first. There are also systems which exhibit upper and lower critical solution temperatures. [Pg.241]

Figure 13.15 is drawn for a single constant pressure equilibrium phase compositions, and hence the locations of the lines, change with pressure, but the general nature of the diagram is the same over a range of pressures. For the majority of systems the species become more soluble in one another as the temperature increases, as indicated by lines CG and DH of Fig. 13.15. If this diagram is drawn for successively higher pressures, the corresponding three-phase equilibrium temperatures increase, and lines CG and DH extend further and further until they meet at the liquid/liquid critical point Af, as shown by Fig. 13.16. The temperature at which this occurs is known as the upper critical solution temperature, and at this temperature the two liquid phases become identical and merge into a single phase. Figure 13.15 is drawn for a single constant pressure equilibrium phase compositions, and hence the locations of the lines, change with pressure, but the general nature of the diagram is the same over a range of pressures. For the majority of systems the species become more soluble in one another as the temperature increases, as indicated by lines CG and DH of Fig. 13.15. If this diagram is drawn for successively higher pressures, the corresponding three-phase equilibrium temperatures increase, and lines CG and DH extend further and further until they meet at the liquid/liquid critical point Af, as shown by Fig. 13.16. The temperature at which this occurs is known as the upper critical solution temperature, and at this temperature the two liquid phases become identical and merge into a single phase.
The system with which we have begun our investigations is the styrene-dimethylsiloxane system. The dimethylsiloxane blocks should be considerably less compatible with polystyrene blocks than either polybutadiene or polyisoprene since the solubility parameter of dimethylsiloxane is much farther from that of polystyrene than are the solubility parameters of polybutadienes or of polyisoprenes (17), no matter what their microstructure. Furthermore, even hexamers of polystyrene and of polydimethylsiloxane are immiscible at room temperature and have an upper critical-solution temperature above 35°C (18). In addition, the microphases in this system can be observed without staining and with no ambiguity about the identity of the phases in the transmission electron microscope (TEM) silicon has a much higher atomic number than carbon or oxygen, making the polydimethylsiloxane microphases the dark phases in TEM (19,20). [Pg.210]

The Flory-temperature or theta-temperature (0F) is defined as the temperature where the partial molar free energy due to polymer-solvent interactions is zero, i.e. when y = 0, so that the polymer-solvent systems show ideal solution behaviour. If T = 0F, the molecules can interpenetrate one another freely with no net interactions. For systems with an upper critical solution temperature (UCST) the polymer molecules attract one another at temperatures T < 0F. If the temperature is much below 0F precipitation occurs. On the other hand for systems with a lower critical solution temperature (LOST) the polymer molecules attract one another at temperatures T > F. If the temperature is much above 0F precipitation occurs. Aqueous polymer solutions show this behaviour. Systems with both UCST and LCST are also known (see, e.g. Napper, 1983). [Pg.211]

Meier et al. [13] assumed that above 353 K the upper critical solution temperature for the a-tocopherol/carbon dioxide system could be reached, above which the liquid and supercritical gas phase are completely soluble in each other. Measurements of phase equilibria carried out by Hoffmann-La Roche AG and our investigations contradict the assumption mentioned. Two coexisting phases are still present at 423 K and 27.5 MPa (see Figure 4). [Pg.660]

Figure 19 depicts plots of the temperature of the observed cloud point vs. the weight fraction w2 of CA(2.46) for each solution 55,56). The lower critical solution temperature, LCST, was determined as the minimum temperature of each cloud-point curve. Some CD-solvent systems show the existence of an upper critical solution temperature, UCST, together with LCST (Fig. 20) 57>. [Pg.27]


See other pages where Upper critical solution temperature system is mentioned: [Pg.204]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.468]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.499]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.195 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.3 , Pg.24 , Pg.25 , Pg.103 , Pg.258 , Pg.330 ]




SEARCH



CRITICAL SOLUTION

Critical solution temperature

Critical temperatur

Critical temperature upper

Critical upper

Solute temperature

Solution systems

Temperature critical

Temperature solutions

Temperature systems

Upper Critical Solution

© 2024 chempedia.info