Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Unknowns, predictions composition

The noble gas, carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur abundances in Jupiter can be compared to the predicted compositions of icy planetesimals to provide details on when and how material was accreted during the formation of Jupiter. Unfortunately the oxygen abundance in Jupiter is unknown, and since water as the primary oxygen carrier was the dominant ice in planetesimals as well (based on observations of comets), one requires this abundance to decide among models. In its absence, the current heavy element inventory can be explained by a model in... [Pg.626]

Since the composition of the unknown appears in each of the correction factors, it is necessary to make an initial estimate of the composition (taken as the measured lvalue normalized by the sum of all lvalues), predict new lvalues from the composition and the ZAF correction factors, and iterate, testing the measured lvalues and the calculated lvalues for convergence. A closely related procedure to the ZAF method is the so-called ())(pz) method, which uses an analytic description of the X-ray depth distribution function determined from experimental measurements to provide a basis for calculating matrix correction factors. [Pg.185]

The data in the training set are used to derive the calibration which we use on the spectra of unknown samples (i.e. samples of unknown composition) to predict the concentrations in those samples. In order for the calibration to be valid, the data in the training set which is used to find the calibration must meet certain requirements. Basically, the training set must contain data which, as a group, are representative, in all ways, of the unknown samples on which the analysis will be used. A statistician would express this requirement by saying, "The training set must be a statistically valid sample of the population... [Pg.13]

There is great interest in the electrical and optical properties of materials confined within small particles known as nanoparticles. These are materials made up of clusters (of atoms or molecules) that are small enough to have material properties very different from the bulk. Most of the atoms or molecules are near the surface and have different environments from those in the interior—indeed, the properties vary with the nanoparticle s actual size. These are key players in what is hoped to be the nanoscience revolution. There is still very active work to learn how to make nanoscale particles of defined size and composition, to measure their properties, and to understand how their special properties depend on particle size. One vision of this revolution includes the possibility of making tiny machines that can imitate many of the processes we see in single-cell organisms, that possess much of the information content of biological systems, and that have the ability to form tiny computer components and enable the design of much faster computers. However, like truisms of the past, nanoparticles are such an unknown area of chemical materials that predictions of their possible uses will evolve and expand rapidly in the future. [Pg.137]

In the discussion that follows, the SIMCA method is illustrated by applying it to three problems (1) quality assurance of chromatography data, (2) classification of unknowns, and (3) predicting the composition of unknown samples. This third problem is one of deconvolution of a mixture and calculation of the relative concentration of the constituents (25. 38). [Pg.210]

Composite interfaces exist in a variety of forms of differing materials. A convenient way to characterize composite interfaces embedded within the bulk material is to analyze the surfaces of the composite constituents before they are combined together, or the surfaces created by fracture. Surface layers represent only a small portion of the total volume of bulk material. The structure and composition of the local surface often differ from the bulk material, yet they can provide critical information in predicting the overall properties and performance. The basic unknown parameters in physico-chemical surface analysis are the chemical composition, depth, purity and the distribution of specific constituents and their atomic/microscopic structures, which constitute the interfaces. Many factors such as process variables, contaminants, surface treatments and exposure to environmental conditions must be considered in the analysis. [Pg.17]

Thus the Screening Hypothesis predicts that the manipulation of the NP composition of plants will produce unknown outcomes but there is only a low probability of harm to human consumers. However, will the public be reassured by what in effect is a probability argument I would suggest that there is a high probability that they will not. [Pg.216]

They introduced their spectroscope in a paper published in 1860 (S). They emphasized the utihty of the spectroscope as a very sensitive tool for qualitative elemental analysis. They predicted that the tool would be valuable in the discovery of yet unknown elements. They noted that the spectroscope had convinced them of the existence of another alkali metal besides lithium, sodium, and potassium eventually they foimd two—cesium and mbidium. In that 1860 paper, they noted that their instrument could shed light on the chemical composition of the sun and stars—not many years after Auguste Comte wrote that such knowledge was beyond the reach of human beings. [Pg.105]

The main limitation of this model [6,14] is that it assumes that the measured response at a given sensor is due entirely to the constituents considered in the calibration step, whose spectra are included in the matrix of sensitivities, S. Hence, in the prediction step, the response of the unknown sample is decomposed only in the contributions that are found in S. If the response of the unknown contains some contributions from constituents that have not been included in S (in addition to background problems and baseline effects), biased predicted concentrations may be obtained, since the system will try to assign this signal to the components in S. For this reason, this model can only be used for systems of known qualitative composition (e.g. gas-phase spectroscopy, some process monitoring or pharmaceutical samples), in which the signal of all the pure constituents giving rise to a response can be known. For the same reason, CLS is not useful for mixtures where interaction between constituents or deviations from the Lambert-Beer law (nonlinear calibration curves) occur. [Pg.170]

Certain software algorithms such as the one mentioned previously uses the high-quality exact mass data from the high-resolution TOF systems to report calculated elemental compositions within the results browser. Good scientific practice mandates the use of an internal reference or lock mass to obtain valid exact mass measurements (sub-5-ppm). Exact mass measurement gives greater confidence in the confirmation of expected metabolites and allows the prediction of the elemental composition of unknowns. The Q-TOF mass spectrometer can be set up to automatically acquire exact mass LC-MS and exact mass MS-MS data to within the recommended mass accuracy guidelines of 5 ppm. [Pg.173]

However, even if a consideration of the macroscopic properties of the SSE many times is useful as a first approximation for predicting the outcome of an unknown electro-organic reaction, it must be borne in mind that the composition of the electrolyte at the electrode surface and its immediate vicinity might be completely different from that of the bulk of the solution. Current theory 19>79 assumes that the electrode surface is covered by an adsorbed layer of ions and neutral molecules during electrolysis. The thickness of this layer, the electrical... [Pg.28]

In contrast to the list of prediction methods that can be constructed from the literature on extrapolation of known mixtures, there is no specific technique that can be applied in practice as a method for mixture extrapolation for mixtures of unknown composition. Even if one has data (e.g., from a large series of WET observations at a certain location), the use of any extrapolation approach to predict the toxicity of a new WET test for that location may be inappropriate, especially when the situation of concern is unpredictable. [Pg.167]


See other pages where Unknowns, predictions composition is mentioned: [Pg.608]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.502]    [Pg.664]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.467]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.192]   


SEARCH



Unknown

© 2024 chempedia.info