Vertical diffusion

Lagrangian trajectory models can be viewed as foUowing a column of air as it is advected in the air basin at the local wind velocity. Simultaneously, the model describes the vertical diffusion of poUutants, deposition, and emissions into the air parcel as shown in Eigure 4. The underlying equation being solved is a simplification of equation 5 ... 

In the application of gradient transfer methods, horizontal diffusion is frequently ignored, but the variation in vertical diffusivity must be approximated (11-14). 

Fig. 8.3-2 Vertical diffusion parameter vs distance from the source. This does not...

To detemiinc concentrations at any position downwind, one must consider the time interval after the time of release atid diffusion in tlie downwind direction as well as lateral and vertical diffusion. 

In the second model, the distribution and removal rates of tracers in the ocean are characterized through a one dimensional, (vertical) diffusion-advection equation. In this model, which ignores all horizontal processes, the equation governing the distribution of tracer in the soluble phase is [51,52,53,54] ... 

Substituting this result into Eq. (9.12) and defining the scale height to be H, the vertical diffusivity variation is... 

Vertical diffusivity coefficient used to numerically model the physical process of turbulence over depth scales in the water column. 

The Gaussian plume foimulations, however, use closed-form solutions of the turbulent version of Equation 5-1 subject to simplifying assumptions. Although these are not treated further here, their description is included for comparative purposes. The assumptions are reflection of species off the ground (that is, zero flux at the ground), constant value of vertical diffusion coefficient, and large distance from the source compared with lateral dimensions. This Gaussian solution to Equation 5-1 is obtained under the assumption that chemical transformation source and sink terms are all zero. In some cases, an exponential decay factor is applied for reactions that obey first-order kinetics. A typical solution (with the time-decay factor) is ... 

Pollutants emitted by various sources entered an air parcel moving with the wind in the model proposed by Eschenroeder and Martinez. Finite-difference solutions to the species-mass-balance equations described the pollutant chemical kinetics and the upward spread through a series of vertical cells. The initial chemical mechanism consisted of 7 species participating in 13 reactions based on sm< -chamber observations. Atmospheric dispersion data from the literature were introduced to provide vertical-diffusion coefficients. Initial validity tests were conducted for a static air mass over central Los Angeles on October 23, 1968, and during an episode late in 1%8 while a special mobile laboratory was set up by Scott Research Laboratories. Curves were plotted to illustrate sensitivity to rate and emission values, and the feasibility of this prediction technique was demonstrated. Some problems of the future were ultimately identified by this work, and the method developed has been applied to several environmental impact studies (see, for example, Wayne et al. ). 

Gradient diffusion was assumed in the species-mass-conservation model of Shir and Shieh. Integration was carried out in the space between the ground and the mixing height with zero fluxes assumed at each boundary. A first-order decay of sulfur dioxide was the only chemical reaction, and it was suggested that this reaction is important only under low wind speed. Finite-difference numerical solutions for sulfur dioxide in the St. Louis, Missouri, area were obtained with a second-order central finite-difference scheme for horizontal terms and the Crank-Nicolson technique for the vertical-diffusion terms. The three-dimensional grid had 16,800 points on a 30 x 40 x 14 mesh. 

For in vitro testing the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) approved in 2004 test guideline 428 [37], which currently advocates the use of human, rat, and pig skin to measure cutaneous absorption by a vertical diffusion system (Franz cell). Dmg concentrations are followed in an acceptor fluid separated by the skin from the donor vehicle, which is applied to the external surface of the skin. Instead of human or animal skin, human skin models could be used as soon as the equivalence of their results are proven. Comparative studies indicate a correlation of penetration data in vitro and in humans [38]. 

Here ay and az, the horizontal and vertical diffusion coefficients, are the standard deviations of the cloud dimensions in the horizontal and vertical directions, respectively. They are functions of the downwind distance x and, in this, differ from the constants Cv and Cz of the Sutton model ... 

In Illustrative Example 19.1, we calculated the vertical exchange of water across the thermocline in a lake by assuming that transport from the epilimnion into the hypolimnion is controlled by a bottleneck layer with thickness 5 = 4m. From experimental data the vertical diffusivity was estimated to lie between 0.01 and 0.04 cm2s 1. Closer inspection of the temperature profiles (see figure in Illustrative Example 19.1) suggests that it would be more adequate to subdivide the bottleneck boundary in two or more sublayers, each with its own diffusivity. 

Consequently, the choice of the averaging time s determines which eddies appear in the mean advective transport term and which ones appear in the fluctuating part (and thus are interpreted as turbulence). The scale dependence of turbulent diffusivity is relevant mainly in the case of horizontal diffusion where eddies come in very different sizes, basically from the millimeter scale to the size of the ring structures related to ocean currents like the Gulf Stream, which exceed the hundred-kilometer scale. Horizontal diffusion will be further discussed in Section 22.3 here we first discuss vertical diffusivity where the scale problem is less relevant. 

While molecular diffusivity is commonly independent of direction (isotropic, to use the correct expression), turbulent diffusivity in the horizontal direction is usually much larger than vertical diffusion. One reason is the involved spatial scales. In the troposphere (the lower part of the atmosphere) and in surface waters, the vertical distances that are available for the development of turbulent structures, that is, of eddies, are generally smaller than the horizontal distances. Thus, for pure geometrical reasons the eddies are like flat pancakes. Needless to say, they are more effective in turbulent mixing along their larger axes than along their smaller vertical extension. 

As mentioned earlier, turbulent motion is usually more intensive along the horizontal than the vertical axis. Turbulent structures (eddies) can be horizontally very large. For instance, the eddies or gyres produced by the Gulf Stream are more than 100 km wide. Thus, for horizontal transport the separation between random and directed motion plays a more crucial role than for the case of vertical diffusion. 

The coefficient of vertical diffusivity is calculated from Eq. 24-32 and from a evaluated in Illustrative Example 24.2. The characteristic time and length scales for vertical mixing are given by Eqs. 24-33 and 24-34. The following table summarizes the results ... 

The very light gases, atomic and molecular hydrogen, which have their origin in the water vapor in the mesosphere, are subject to vertical diffusion and are transported to the upper levels of the atmosphere, where they form the terrestrial hydrogen corona, and from where finally they escape continually into interplanetary space. 

In this expression, 3 represents the increase factor of vertical diffusion due to the plume. Gaussian plume or dispersion models are based on standard deviations of the plume dimensions (crx, cry, oz). These represent a measure of the diffusive capacity of the atmosphere. They are dependent on the turbulence conditions of the atmosphere, the vertical temperature gradient (which helps to establish atmospheric turbulence in the vertical direction) and the transporting distance. 

IJA is the rate of decomposition of detritus in environment A kA is the kinematical coefficient of vertical diffusion is the velocity of nutrient assimilation by the photosynthetic process per unit of phytoplankton production ef is the proportional part of the eth radionuclide that is chemically analogous to B6 A on substrate A H is the rate of input flow of the eth radionuclide 7) is the rate of exchange with the environment p is that part of biomass losses due to exchange that transforms into nutrients (Legendre and Legendre, 1998) and f3v is upwelling velocity. Equation (6.1) is the basic element of block NM. 

---