Ultrafiltration membrane modules

The direct cost of one-time investment of ultrafiltration membrane modules was about 150 CN Y/m. The annual operation costs of the membrane modules consist of energy consumption of pumps and air compressors, and consumption of chemical agent. The running cost of treating SFBW by ultrafiltration is shown in Table 5. 

Membrane equipment for industrial scale operation of microfiltration, ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis is supplied in the form of modules. The area of membrane contained in these basic modules is in the range 1-20 m2. The modules may be connected together in series or in parallel to form a plant of the required performance. The four most common types of membrane modules are tubular, flat sheet, spiral wound and hollow fibre, as shown in Figures 8.9-8.12. 

Cabral and coworkers [253] have investigated the batch mode synthesis of a dipeptide acetyl phenylalanine leucinamide (AcPhe-Leu-NH2) catalyzed by a-chymotrypsin in a ceramic ultrafiltration membrane reactor using a TTAB/oc-tanol/heptane reverse micellar system. Separation of the dipeptide was achieved by selective precipitation. Later on the same group successfully synthesized the same dipeptide in the same reactor system in a continuous mode [254] with high yields (70-80%) and recovery (75-90%). The volumetric production was as high as 4.3 mmol peptide/l/day with a purity of 92%. The reactor was operated for seven days continuously without any loss of enzyme activity. Hakoda et al. [255] proposed an electro-ultrafiltration bioreactor for separation of RMs containing enzyme from the product stream. A ceramic membrane module was used to separate AOT-RMs containing lipase from isooctane. Application of an electric field enhanced the ultrafiltration efficiency (flux) and it further improved when the anode and cathode were placed in the permeate and the reten-tate side respectively. 

Polymer-Assisted Ultrafiltration of Boric Acid. The Quickstand (AGT, Needham, MA) filtration apparatus is pictured schematically in Figure 3. The hollow fiber membrane module contained approximately 30 fibers with 0.5 mm internal diameter and had a nominal molecular weight cut-off of 10,000 and a surface area of 0.015 m2. A pinch clamp in the retentate recycle line was used to supply back pressure to the system. In a typical run, the transmembrane pressure was maintained at 25 psig and the retentate and permeate flow rates were 25 ml/min and 3 ml/min, respectively. Permeate flux remained constant throughout the experiments. 

Figure 19.3. Tubular and plate-and-frame membrane modules for reverse osmosis and ultrafiltration, (a) Construction and flow pattern of a single 1 in. dia tube with membrane coating on the inside in Table 19.4, the Ultracor model has seven tubes in a shell and the Supercor has 19 [Koch Membrane Systems (Abcor)]. (b) Assembly of a plate-and-frame ultrafiltration module (Danish Sugar Co.), (c) Flow in a plate-and-frame ultrafiltration module.

Figure 6.11 An illustration of the channel of a spiral-wound module showing how periodic turbulent eddies can dislodge deposited gel particles from the surface of ultrafiltration membranes...

Several cleaning methods are used to remove the densified gel layer of retained material from the membrane surface. The easiest is to circulate an appropriate cleaning solution through the membrane modules for 1 or 2 h. The most common ultrafiltration fouling layers—organic polymer colloids and gelatinous... 

Ultrafiltration systems should never be taken off line without thorough flushing and cleaning. Because membrane modules are normally stored wet, the final rinse solutions should contain a bacteriostat such as 0.5% formaldehyde to inhibit bacterial growth. 

Because of the challenging environment in which ultrafiltration membranes are operated and the regular cleaning cycles, membrane lifetime is significantly shorter than that of reverse osmosis membranes. Ultrafiltration module lifetimes are rarely more than 2-3 years, and modules may be replaced annually in cheese whey or electrocoat paint applications. In contrast, reverse osmosis membranes are normally not cleaned more than once or twice per year and can last 4-5 years. 

The current ultrafiltration market is approximately US 200 million/year but because the market is very fragmented, no individual segment is more than about US 10-30 million/year. Also, each of the diverse applications uses membranes, modules, and system designs tailored to the particular industry served. The result is little product standardization, many custom-built systems, and high costs compared to reverse osmosis. The first large successful application was the recovery... 

However, the short lifetime of in-line cartridge filters makes them unsuitable for microfiltration of highly contaminated feed streams. Cross-flow filtration, which overlaps significantly with ultrafiltration technology, described in Chapter 6, is used in such applications. In cross-flow filtration, long filter life is achieved by sweeping the majority of the retained particles from the membrane surface before they enter the membrane. Screen filters are preferred for this application, and an ultrafiltration membrane can be used. The design of such membranes and modules is covered under ultrafiltration (Chapter 6) and will not be repeated here. 

This chapter will focus on three types of membrane extracorporeal devices, hemodialyzers, plasma filters for fractionating blood components, and artificial liver systems. These applications share the same physical principles of mass transfer by diffusion and convection across a microfiltration or ultrafiltration membrane (Figure 18.1). A considerable amount of research and development has been undertaken by membrane and modules manufacturers for producing more biocompatible and permeable membranes, while improving modules performance by optimizing their internal fluid mechanics and their geometry. 

Ultrafiltration experiments were carried using the same setup, except the flat-sheet membrane module had a filtration area 38 mm long, 29 mm wide, and 1.6 mm high, with a surface area of 11 cm2. The permeate side had 11 grooved channels that supported the membrane, leaving an effective filtration area of 6.4 cm2. However, the total membrane area including the supports was used in calculating the fluxes. The feed consisted of cellulase enzyme solution (5.0 g/L of supplied cellulase, unless noted otherwise). 

Most tubular membrane modules are used for specialty microfiltration (MF) and ultrafiltration (UF) applications rather than RO due to the lower packing density of this type of module and because MF and UF typically treat higher-solids feed water (see Chapter 16.1). 

Table 16.3 Advantages and limitation of various module configurations for microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes.

---