Two-point extrapolation

For the smaller basis sets used in W1 theory, the regime where the leading Eoo + A/L3 term dominates convergence behavior has not yet been reached, and using the formula in its unmodified form leads to overestimated (in absolute value) CCSD limits. One unelegant solution would be the use of three-term extrapolations like Eoo + A/L3 + B/L4, but in light of the poor quality of the VDZ basis set this is a most unsatisfactory alternative. Another alternative is the use of a two-point extrapolation Eoo + A/LQ, in which a is a fixed empirical parameter. By minimizing the deviation from the W2 CCSD limit for the so-called W2-1 set of 28 molecules (vide infra), we determined a = 3.22, which is the value used in W1 theory and its variants. 

The valence correlation energy is estimated from two-point extrapolation for CCSD, CCSD(T) and CCSDT calculations. The effects of higher order correlation effects are estimated from CCSDTQ/cc-pVDZ results scaled by an empirical factor of 1.25. 

In W1-F12 theory, the Hartree-Fock component is extrapolated from the VDZ-F12 and VTZ-F12 basis sets, using the E L) = + A/L two-point extrapolation for-... 

In W2-F12, the Hartree-Fock component is calculated with the VQZ-F12 basis set. The valence CCSD-F12 correlation energy is extrapolated from the VTZ-F12 and VQZ-F12 basis sets, using the above two-point extrapolation formula with a = 5.94. The quasiperturbative triples, (T), corrections are obtained from standard CCSD(T)/VTZ-F12 calculations (i.e., without inclusion of F12 terms) and scaled by the factor f = 0.987 x mp2-fi2/-Emp2- This approach has been shown to accelerate the basis set convergence [31, 49]. The CCSD inner-shell contribution is calculated with the core-valence weighted correlation-consistent A PWCVTZ basis set, while the (T) inner-shell contribution is calculated with the PWCVTZ(no Q basis set. The scalar relativistic, spin-orbit coupling, DBOC, and ZPVE corrections are obtained in the same way as in W1-F12 theory. 

The results for Eoo obtained from these extrapolations are denoted Schwartz6(A mn) and Schwartzo (A m ), respectively, when derived from cc-pYkZ, cc-pVmZ, and cc-pVnZ energies. In addition, Schwartz4(mn) denotes a two-point extrapolation... 

A plot of the absorbance against the concentration of the pure analyte does not pass through zero as all the absorbance values are enhanced by an equal amount due to the presence of the unknown concentration in the added sample. Extrapolation of the graph back to the abscissa (the horizontal axis) gives the concentration of the unknown as a negative value. Alternatively it can be determined from the slope of the line by taking any two points on the line, as shown in Fig. 19.10. From this it can be seen that ... 

The cross-peak coordinates represent two frequency values, va and vp, where va + vp=2v, and v is the proton frequency. When plotted in the coordinates v2a and v2p, the contour lineshape is transformed into a straight line segment. An extrapolation of this straight line permits the determination of the hyperfine tensors. A curve obtained by choosing some frequencies in the range will intersect the line defined by the squares of the values v2a and v2p in two points. The values where the curve intersects the experimental data are (val, vpi) and (va2, vp2), where va=A/2 + v, and vp= Vj-A/2. This gives two values of the anisotropic coupling tensor, Ar... 

In 20% dioxan (Hegarty et ai, 1974). The reference reaction is nucleophilic attack by alkoxide ions on phenyl N-methyl-N-phenylcarbamate at 25° in water (Hutchins and Fife, 1973). The rate constant for bimolecular attack by an oxyanion of pKt 4.26 (3.6 x 10-13 dm3 mol-1 s-1) is obtained by a long extrapolation of a two point Bronsted plot (which has the reasonable slope of 0.90)... 

Extrapolation of the CCSD valence correlation component of TAE from the medium and large basis sets (Wl) or from the large and extra-large basis sets (W2) employing the two-point formula E(n) = Eoo + A/Ba, where a = 3.22 (Wl) or 3 exactly (W2). 

However, as definitive values for E (CBS) became available from the MP2-R12 calculations of Klopper [48], it became clear that Eq. (6.1) seriously underestimates the magnitude of the basis set truncation error. Wilson and Dunning therefore examined [53] a wide variety of extrapolations (24 variations) based on generalizations of Eq. (1.1). They obtained RMS deviations from Klopper s results of less than 1 mEh using several different extrapolation schemes. We arrived at comparable results (Table 4.4) using just two points, E (lmax2) and E(2)(Zmaxi), so... 

The modification of Schreinemakers wet residue method which was used in this part of the investigation is that instead of analyzing the wet residue, a complex is prepared of known composition and the solution only is analyzed. This again gives two points on the diagram the solution point on the curve and the complex point which replaces the wet residue point. Hill and Ricci (7) claim that the complex method is as accurate or more accurate than the residue method if algebraic extrapolation of the tie-lines is used. 

A number of interpolation and extrapolation methods are commonly used, including two-point linear interpolation, graphical interpolation, and curve fitting. Which one is most appropriate depends on the nature of the relationship between x and y. 

Jurecka et al have published a database of accurate benchmark quality interaction energies of small model complexes, DNA base pairs, and amino acid pairs obtained from MP2 and CCSD(T) calculations together with estimates of the complete basis set limit. They examine interaction energies and geometries for more than 100 DNA base pairs, amino acid pairs and model complexes. Extrapolation to the complete basis set limit was carried out by these researchers using a two-point method in conjunction with correlation consistent basis sets. 

Smaller molecules and inert gas atoms have been extensively studied using EFISH in the gas phase (see for example Miller and Ward, Ward and Miller, Shelton ). Shelton and Rice provide a comprehensive list of gaseous EFISH measurements on small molecules up to 1994. The only such result reported for molecules with donor/ acceptor substitution on a benzene ring appears to be that obtained by Kaatz et alP for pNA in 1998. In this experiment a gas mixture containing 0.075 mole fraction of pNA was used to obtain an EFISH measurement at 1064 nm at one temperature. The y (—2(B (B,a),0) of eqn (4.15) was estimated from a THG experiment and taken as the intercept on a two point plot of y versus /T. The value of was calculated from the slope. The linearity of such plots has been confirmed in the work on smaller molecules. The gas phase method differs from that used for solutions in that the extrapolation to infinite dilution is not made since the molecular density in the gas is very much smaller. Also the internal field factors are close to unity. It is usually possible to make measurements over a sufficiently wide range of temperatures to obtain the quantity (jifi/k) from the plot of F versus l/F. In the case of pNA the value of the dipole was chosen as 6.87 D. 

In many cases the measurement time of gas adsorption after a pressure change of the sorptive can be reduced substantially by measuring only two points in the initial part of the kinetic curve and extrapolation of the equilibrium value. The method is useful in the case of very slow adsorption processes and for the stepwise measurement of isotherms. 

A very important but often neglected aspect of in vitro toxicology is pharmacokinetics or toxicokinetics. Kinetics deals with how a test compound is altered by the system it is applied to. For an in vitro system, the available concentration of the compound can be decreased by binding to cell culture-ware such as a plastic cell culture dish, by binding to proteins in the cell culture medium, by evaporation and due to cellular uptake or cellular metabolism. The latter two points are critical in both in vitro and in vivo systems and are discussed in detail in Chap. 22. Knowing the actual concentration that cells can interact with, either by measurement as a free concentration in the cell medium or as a tissue concentration in the cell lysate, is crucial not only for experimental interpretation but also to extrapolate to the in vivo situation. Indeed, we must eventually extrapolate from in vitro to in vivo in order to establish safe exposure limits, which is after all the end goal of the exercise. These issues are dealt with in Chaps. 23 and 24. 

FIGURE 1.12 pHo falls outside the range of data points, and is determined by extrapolation. Circles represent data points. Curves represent two arbitrary extrapolations. Numerous pHo values reported in the literature, especially in ranges of very low or of very high pH, have been obtained by extrapolation. 

---