Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Two-dimensional separation space

Davis and coworkers (1991, 1993) examined the ramifications of random zones placed in two-dimensional separation spaces. This work discovered that the peak capacity was not as efficiently utilized in two dimensions as opposed to onedimensional separations. Davis (1991) said... [Pg.21]

Total theoretical peak capacity for the ID and 2D LC/MS analyses of the yeast ribosomal protein sample was calculated as 240 and 700, respectively. Individual separation peak capacities were calculated by dividing the total separation time by the average peak width at baseline, and the 2D peak capacity determined as the product of the peak capacity of the two dimensions. These theoretical calculations rely on optimal use of the two-dimensional separation space, which in turn is dependent upon the lack of correlation between the component retention times in the two separation modes. Thus, the maximum use of the theoretical peak capacity is not only dependent on the selection of chromatographic modes based on different physicochemical... [Pg.306]

Figure 15 Two-dimensional separation space for a set of natural products utilizing separation systems that are... Figure 15 Two-dimensional separation space for a set of natural products utilizing separation systems that are...
FIGURE 6.11 Reconstructed gas chromatographic trace for a lavender essential oil (a), and the two-dimensional separation space for the GC x GC analysis of the same sample (b). The minor component Z overlaps completely from the major component Y in the D M monoterpene hydrocarbons, S sesquiterpene hydrocarbons. (From Shellie, R. et al., 2002. J. Chromatogr. A, 970 225-234. With permission.)... [Pg.173]

The ordering of classes of compounds within the separation space was summarized by Ledford et al. (33), who presented an analogy to the separation by using a mixture of objects of varied shapes, colours and sizes. The experimental dimensions could separate objects based on mechanisms which were sensitive to shape, size or colour, and the choice of two of these for the two-dimensional separation was illustrated. Applications showed a variety of petroleum products on different column sets, as well as a perfume sample. [Pg.97]

Frahm, J.L., Howard, B.E., Heber, S., Muddiman, D.C. (2006). Accessible proteomics space and its implications for peak capacity for zero-, one-, and two-dimensional separations coupled with FT-ICR and TOF mass spectrometry. J. Mass Spectrom. 41, 281-288. [Pg.31]

FIGURE 2.18 Projection of the object points from a two-dimensional variable space on to a direction b135 giving a latent variable with a good separation of the object classes. [Pg.69]

Figure 4 Two arbitrary potential energy surfaces in a two-dimensional coordinate space. All units are arbitrary. Panel A shows two minima connected by a path in phase space requiring correlated change in both degrees of freedom (labeled Path a). As is indicated, paths involving sequential change of the degrees of freedom encounter a large enthalpic barrier (labeled Path b). Panel B shows two minima separated by a barrier. No path with a small enthalpic barrier is available, and correlated, stepwise evolution of the system is not sufficient for barrier crossing. Figure 4 Two arbitrary potential energy surfaces in a two-dimensional coordinate space. All units are arbitrary. Panel A shows two minima connected by a path in phase space requiring correlated change in both degrees of freedom (labeled Path a). As is indicated, paths involving sequential change of the degrees of freedom encounter a large enthalpic barrier (labeled Path b). Panel B shows two minima separated by a barrier. No path with a small enthalpic barrier is available, and correlated, stepwise evolution of the system is not sufficient for barrier crossing.
Here Pa(a = 6, e) is the momentum conjugate to Qa. In the absence of spin-orbit interaction, the e vibration does not mix the orbital components of the 4T2 g and we have vibrational potential energy surfaces consisting of three separate ( disjoint ) paraboloids in the two-dimensional (2D) space of the Qe and Qe coordinates of the e vibration. The Jahn-Teller coupling leads only to a uniform shift (—ZsPJX = — V2/2fia>2 = —Sha>) of all vibronic levels. [Pg.533]

After these stages, the treated sample undergoes a meticulous thermal treatment. During this treatment, the dehydration and dehydroxylation of the exchanged material take place, the stable metal oxide clusters then develop, which carry out the layer separation, generating a two-dimensional interlayer space with an aperture, which, if the process is correctly performed, can be larger than 10 A [12,36] (see Figure 2.25). The obtained materials are stable up to 625-725 K [31]. [Pg.427]

Reaction-path coordinates were first described in detail by Marcus (1966). Choosing a curve 4 in the two-dimensional configuration space (x, X) for the reaction AB + C -> A + BC, he introduced two new variables the distance s along ( , and r, the shortest distance of nearby points in the plane to < . He then proposed an adiabatic-separable method that included curvilinear motion effects. Writing for the potential V, without loss of generality,... [Pg.13]

A PCET reaction is described by four separate transfer sites derived from a donor and an acceptor for both an electron and a proton [5]. This four state description of PCET gives rise to two important considerations. A geometric aspect to PCET arises when considering the different possible spatial configurations of the four transfer sites. A HAT reaction comprises just one possible arrangement - where the electron and proton transfer sites are coincidental - however this need not be the case for PCET in general. In addition, the two-dimensional reaction space spanned by the four PCET states shown in Fig. 17.1 encompasses infinite mechanistic possibilities (i.e., pathways) for the coordinated transfer of an electron and a proton. These two issues of geometry and mechanism must be taken into account... [Pg.504]

Practical implementation of two-dimensional separation is very easy in TLC. By definition, all the components of the sample are subjected to both separation dimensions, and components separated in the first dimension remain resolved in the second dimension. When a two-dimensional separation fulfills these requirements, it is considered comprehensive. From the practical point of view, multidimensional separations are much more difficult to implement in column chromatography. To perform the 2D separation in space, i.e., in a manner analogous to... [Pg.169]

In Co,-based CG representations of backbone chains, the two-dimensional Ramachandran space is reduced to one bending parameter (angle y in Fig. 5). The most common secondary structure elements a-helices and p-sheets correspond to two well-separated values of y ( 90° for the a-helix and between 120° and 140° for the p-sheet). This simple example is sufficient to explain how a CG potential that aims at exploring thermodynamically accessible protein conformations and/or folding events cannot use a simple harmonic approximation for the angular terms, but it requires more complicated functional forms allowing multiple minima. [Pg.13]

Multidimensional planar chromatographic separations, as we have seen, require not only a multiplicity of separation stages, but also that the integrity of separation achieved in one stage be transferred to the others. The process of separation on a two-dimensional plane is the clearest example of multidimensional separations. The greatest strength of MD-PC, when properly applied, is that compounds are distributed widely over two-dimensional space of high zone (peak) capacity. Another... [Pg.193]

Consider a simple perceptron with N continuous-valued inputs and one binary (— 1) output value. In section 10.5.2 we saw how, in general, an A -dimensional input space is separated by an (N — l)-dimensional hyperplane into two distinct regions. All of the points lying on one side of the hyperplane yield the output -)-l all the points on the other side of the hyperplane yield -1. [Pg.550]


See other pages where Two-dimensional separation space is mentioned: [Pg.454]    [Pg.455]    [Pg.464]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.454]    [Pg.455]    [Pg.464]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.487]    [Pg.485]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.532]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.679]    [Pg.2781]    [Pg.2363]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.539]    [Pg.570]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.482]    [Pg.225]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.306 ]




SEARCH



0-dimensional space

Separation space

Separations, two-dimensional

© 2024 chempedia.info