Twin screw devolatilization systems

This system incorporates rearward venting, stranding of the meit at the iniet to increase surface area, variabie gap before the section vent port by axiai screw adjustment, water injection, and bypass venting at the finai vent port. Such a system can reduce the monomer ievei from 15% down to as low as 0.1% in one operation. Such devolatilization performance is quite comparable to that of twin screw devolatilization systems. 

If a linear mbber is used as a feedstock for the mass process (85), the mbber becomes insoluble in the mixture of monomers and SAN polymer which is formed in the reactors, and discrete mbber particles are formed. This is referred to as phase inversion since the continuous phase shifts from mbber to SAN. Grafting of some of the SAN onto the mbber particles occurs as in the emulsion process. Typically, the mass-produced mbber particles are larger (0.5 to 5 llm) than those of emulsion-based ABS (0.1 to 1 llm) and contain much larger internal occlusions of SAN polymer. The reaction recipe can include polymerization initiators, chain-transfer agents, and other additives. Diluents are sometimes used to reduce the viscosity of the monomer and polymer mixture to faciUtate processing at high conversion. The product from the reactor system is devolatilized to remove the unreacted monomers and is then pelletized. Equipment used for devolatilization includes single- and twin-screw extmders, and flash and thin film evaporators. Unreacted monomers are recovered for recycle to the reactors to improve the process yield. 

One of the earliest published studies on extraction in twin-screw extruders was conducted by Todd (1974). In this work devolatilization was conducted under vacuum using two different polymeric systems, polystyrene in one and polyethylene in the other. In the case of polystyrene, styrene was not used as the volatUe component so as to avoid problems associated with further polymerization or depolymerization instead, use was made of mixtures of thiophene and toluene or ethylbenzene. Todd found good agreement between the measured exit concentrations of the volatile component and the predicted values using Pe = 40 in the solution to Eq. (38) (see Fig. 15). The value of 5 in Eq. (39) was not reported and it is not known whether a value was chosen to provide a fit with the data or whether it was known a priori. In any event, what is clear is that the exit concentration varies with IVwhich suggests that mass transfer is occur-... 

Werner (1980) has studied devolatilization in corotating twin-screw extruders when the volatile component was stripped from the polymeric solution by applying a vacuum to the system. Rough estimates of the equilibrium partial pressure of the volatile component in the feedstream for each of the systems studied by Werner indicate that this pressure was less than the applied pressure, which means that bubbles could have been formed. Figure 17 shows the influence of the externally applied pressure on the exit concentration for a methyl methacrylate-poly(methyl methacrylate) system of fixed concentration. Note that the exit concentration decreases as the pressure is decreased, but seems to approach an asymptotic value at the lowest pressures studied. Werner also reported that at a fixed flow rate and feed concentration the exit concentration did not vary with screw speed (over the range 150-300 min" ), which also suggests that ky alay, is independent of screw speed. Figure 18 is a plot of data obtained by Werner on an ethylene-low-density poly(ethylene) system and also shows that decreases in the applied pressure result in decreases in the exit concentration, but here a lower asymptote is not observed. 

---