Transition states assumption

The key idea that supplements RRK theory is the transition state assumption. The transition state is assumed to be a point of no return. In other words, any trajectory that passes through the transition state in the forward direction will proceed to products without recrossing in the reverse direction. This assumption permits the identification of the reaction rate with the rate at which classical trajectories pass through the transition state. In combination with the ergodic approximation this means that the reaction rate coefficient can be calculated from the rate at which trajectories, sampled from a microcanonical ensemble in the reactants, cross the barrier, divided by the total number of states in the ensemble at the required energy. This quantity is conveniently formulated using the idea of phase space. 

Due to the central role the reaction rate constant plays in physical chemistiy, many more or less accurate approximations for this quantity have been developed over time, starting from the Arrhenius equation [1] and transition state theory (TST) [2-4]. Among the most accurate of such approximations are so-called quantum transition state theories [5-18], which treat the rate constant quantum mechanically, but, similarly to the original classical TST, still rely on some sort of a transition state assumption. A recent such approximation that can also treat general many-dimensional systems is the quantum instanton (Ql) approximation of Miller et al. [17]. 

We noted in Section 9.1.2.5 that it would not be correct to use the transition-state theory expression k = (IqsT/h) exp(—AG /k T), since in the Marcus model the transition-state assumptions do not apply to the conditions in the transition region. 

Conventionally the transition-state assumption has been extended to a quantum mechanical world by assuming a separable reaction-coordinate orthogonal to the dividing surface and quantizing... 

A quantitative theory of rate processes has been developed on the assumption that the activated state has a characteristic enthalpy, entropy and free energy the concentration of activated molecules may thus be calculated using statistical mechanical methods. Whilst the theory gives a very plausible treatment of very many rate processes, it suffers from the difficulty of calculating the thermodynamic properties of the transition state. 

The quasi-equilibrium assumption in the above canonical fonn of the transition state theory usually gives an upper bound to the real rate constant. This is sometimes corrected for by multiplying (A3.4.98) and (A3.4.99) with a transmission coefifiwient 0 < k < 1. 

In the statistical description of ununolecular kinetics, known as Rice-Ramsperger-Kassel-Marcus (RRKM) theory [4,7,8], it is assumed that complete IVR occurs on a timescale much shorter than that for the unimolecular reaction [9]. Furdiemiore, to identify states of the system as those for the reactant, a dividing surface [10], called a transition state, is placed at the potential energy barrier region of the potential energy surface. The assumption implicit m RRKM theory is described in the next section. 

In deriving the RRKM rate constant in section A3.12.3.1. it is assumed that the rate at which reactant molecules cross the transition state, in the direction of products, is the same rate at which the reactants fonn products. Thus, if any of the trajectories which cross the transition state in the product direction return to the reactant phase space, i.e. recross the transition state, the actual unimolecular rate constant will be smaller than that predicted by RRKM theory. This one-way crossing of the transition state, witii no recrossmg, is a fiindamental assumption of transition state theory [21]. Because it is incorporated in RRKM theory, this theory is also known as microcanonical transition state theory. 

Do we expect this model to be accurate for a dynamics dictated by Tsallis statistics A jump diffusion process that randomly samples the equilibrium canonical Tsallis distribution has been shown to lead to anomalous diffusion and Levy flights in the 5/3 < q < 3 regime. [3] Due to the delocalized nature of the equilibrium distributions, we might find that the microstates of our master equation are not well defined. Even at low temperatures, it may be difficult to identify distinct microstates of the system. The same delocalization can lead to large transition probabilities for states that are not adjacent ill configuration space. This would be a violation of the assumptions of the transition state theory - that once the system crosses the transition state from the reactant microstate it will be deactivated and equilibrated in the product state. Concerted transitions between spatially far-separated states may be common. This would lead to a highly connected master equation where each state is connected to a significant fraction of all other microstates of the system. [9, 10]... 

Examining transition state theory, one notes that the assumptions of Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics are not completely correct because some of the molecules reaching the activation energy will react, lose excess vibrational energy, and not be able to go back to reactants. Also, some molecules that have reacted may go back to reactants again. 

The original microscopic rate theory is the transition state theory (TST) [10-12]. This theory is based on two fundamental assumptions about the system dynamics. (1) There is a transition state dividing surface that separates the short-time intrastate dynamics from the long-time interstate dynamics. (2) Once the reactant gains sufficient energy in its reaction coordinate and crosses the transition state the system will lose energy and become deactivated product. That is, the reaction dynamics is activated crossing of the barrier, and every activated state will successfully react to fonn product. 

Given the foregoing assumptions, it is a simple matter to construct an expression for the transition state theory rate constant as the probability of (1) reaching the transition state dividing surface and (2) having a momenrnm along the reaction coordinate directed from reactant to product. Stated another way, is the equilibrium flux of reactant states across... 

Figure 2 A typical trajectory satisfying the assumptions of transition state theory. The reactive trajectory crosses the transition state surface once and only once on its way from activated reactant to deactivated product.

The assumptions of transition state theory allow for the derivation of a kinetic rate constant from equilibrium properties of the system. That seems almost too good to be true. In fact, it sometimes is [8,18-21]. Violations of the assumptions of TST do occur. In those cases, a more detailed description of the system dynamics is necessary for the accurate estimate of the kinetic rate constant. Keck [22] first demonstrated how molecular dynamics could be combined with transition state theory to evaluate the reaction rate constant (see also Ref. 17). In this section, an attempt is made to explain the essence of these dynamic corrections to TST. 

Note that when f = 1 we find that the assumptions of TST are met and K = 1. As the number of recrossings of the transition state increases, both P and K decrease. 

All the residues involved in important functions in the catalytic mechanism are strictly conserved in all homologous GTPases with one notable exception. Ras does not have the arginine in the switch 1 region that stabilizes the transition state. The assumption that the lack of this catalytically important residue was one reason for the slow rate of GTP hydrolysis by Ras was confirmed when the group of Alfred Wittinghofer, Max-Planck Institute,... 

The natiue of the rate constants k, can be discussed in terms of transition-state theory. This is a general theory for analyzing the energetic and entropic components of a reaction process. In transition-state theory, a reaction is assumed to involve the formation of an activated complex that goes on to product at an extremely rapid rate. The rate of deconposition of the activated con lex has been calculated from the assumptions of the theory to be 6 x 10 s at room temperature and is given by the expression ... 

The chemical species in the transition state is in equilibrium with the reactant state. This assumption is discussed below. 

Let us examine the equilibrium assumption of transition state theory. Consider a reversible elementary reaction at equilibrium. Because the initial and final states are at equilibrium, assuredly the transition state is in equilibrium with each of these. (It follows that for a reaction at equilibrium, transition state theory is exact insofar as the equilibrium assumption is concerned.)... 

Now suppose that, from this equilibrium situation, the final state is instantaneously removed. The production of transition state species by the product state will cease. However, the production of transition state species by the reactant state is unaffected by this suppression of the final state, and, according to the third postulate of the theory, the rate of reaction is a function of the transition state concentration formed from the reactant state. This is the usual argument for the equilibrium assumption. Despite its apparent artificiality, the equilibrium assumption is generally considered to be fairly sound, with the possible exception of its application to very fast reactions. ... 

Here Z represents the reaction products. M is the transition state the double dagger symbol will always signify a quantity or structure relating to the transition state. Scheme I incorporates the equilibrium assumption by writing the conversion of the initial state into the transition state as an equilibrium. This assumption then allows us to apply statistical mechanics to the rate problem making use of Eq. (5-32), we have... 

The appearance of Cd in the denominator means that D is coupled to a reversible step prior to the rds. If k, and k- were so large that the fast preequilibrium assumption is valid, then the Cd term in the denominator would drop out, and we would have v = A 2 CaObCd, giving the composition of the rds transition state. If k2 is very much larger than it, and k i, Eq. (5-59) becomes v = A CaOb the first step is now the rds, and the rate equation gives the transition state composition. 

Several explanations have been given for this result. One possibility is the failure of the adiabatic assumption in this ionization process a transition state is generated that may not be a combination of the initial and final states, but may include mixing in of an excited state structure. This idea will reappear in the following pages. 

A first-order rate constant has the dimension time, but all other rate constants include a concentration unit. It follows that a change of concentration scale results in a change in the magnitude of such a rate constant. From the equilibrium assumption of transition state theory we developed these equations in Chapter 5 ... 

The extension to rates draws on the equilibrium assumption of transition state theory to yield the analogous result, with rate constants replacing the equilibrium constants of Eq. (6-96). Kresge has generalized this argument, the result being... 

---