Transition state recrossing effects

This is connnonly known as the transition state theory approximation to the rate constant. Note that all one needs to do to evaluate (A3.11.187) is to detennine the partition function of the reagents and transition state, which is a problem in statistical mechanics rather than dynamics. This makes transition state theory a very usefiil approach for many applications. However, what is left out are two potentially important effects, tiiimelling and barrier recrossing, bodi of which lead to CRTs that differ from the sum of step frmctions assumed in (A3.11.1831. 

Beyond Transition State Theory (and, therefore, beyond Monte Carlo simulations) dynamical effects coming from recrossings should be introduced. Furthermore, additional quantum mechanical aspects, like tunneling, should be taken into account in some chemical reactions. 

Most modern investigations of the effects of a solvent on the rate constant, where dynamical fluctuations are included, are based on a classical paper by Kramers from 1940 [1], His theory is based on the transition-state theory approach where we have identified the reaction coordinate as the normal mode of the activated complex that has an imaginary frequency. In ordinary transition-state theory, we assume that the motion in that coordinate is like a free translational motion with no recrossings. This... 

It should be emphasized that these dynamical effects can lead to significant corrections to conventional transition-state theory where recrossings are neglected. However,... 

First of all, liquid-phase studies generally do not obtain data which allows static and dynamic solvent effects to be separated [96,97], Static solvent effects produce changes in activation barriers. Dynamic solvent effects induce barrier recrossing and can lead to modification of rate constants without changing the barrier height. Dynamic solvent effects are temperature and viscosity dependent. In some cases they can cause a breakdown in transition state theory [96]. 

In transition state theory, dynamic effects are included approximately by including a transmission coefficient in the rate expression [9]. This lowers the rate from its ideal maximum TS theory value, and should account for barrier recrossing by trajectories that reach the TS (activated complex) region but do not successfully cross to products (as all trajectories reaching this point are assumed to do in TS theory). The transmission coefficient can be calculated by activated molecular dynamics techniques, in which molecular dynamics trajectories are started from close to the TS and their progress monitored to find the velocity at which the barrier is crossed and the proportion that go on to react successfully [9,26,180]. It is not possible to study activated processes by standard molecular dynamics because barrier crossing events occur so rarely. One reason for the... 

These examples, although few and preliminary, nonetheless indicate the direction in which time-resolved spectroscopy of reactive species is headed. More detailed examinations of unstable structures between chemical reactants and products will certainly follow. A major goal in this area will be direct observation of coherent wavepacket propagation through local potential maxima (i.e., transition states). Experimental control over wavepacket momentum through potential maxima will be especially important in evaluating solvent effects, barrier recrossing probabilities, and so on. Methods that permit observation and control of transition state production may be anticipated. 

Inclusion of dynamical effects allows calculation of corrections to simple Transition State Theory, often described by a transmission coefficient k to be multiplied with the TST rate constant (Section 12.1), or used in connection with variational TST (Section 12.3). Classical dynamics allow corrections due to recrossing to be calculated, while a quantum treatment is necessary for including tunnelling effects. Owing to the stringent... 

Of course, TST is sometimes incorrect even in gases (see, for example, the well known breakdown of TST in its standard form exhibited by activated unimolecular reactions) in a solvent, this approach can fail due to different reasons, such as the retarding effects or collisionally induced recrossing. All these sources of breakdown of the Transition State Theory have... 

In Fig. 1 (right panel), we plot the time-dependent rate coefEcient obtained from an average over 16000 trajectories. We see that kAB t) falls quickly from its initial transition state theory value in a few tenths of a picosecond to a plateau from which the rate constant can be extracted. The decrease in the rate coefficient from its transition state theory value is due to recrossing by the trajectory of the barrier top before the system reaches a metastable state. The value of kAs obtained from the plateau is kAB = 0.013 ps F The adiabatic rate constant is k g = 0.019 ps, indicating that nonadiabatic effects influence the proton transfer rate. 

The transition state theory (TST) may be considered to be established in 1941 by publication of a momunental book The Theory of Rate Processes [1. In Chapter VIII of the book, the authors discuss solution reactions and conclude. . that the ratedetermining step in solution is. .. the formation from the reactants of an activated complex which subsequently decomposes . Though the authors pointed out the importance of diffusion in bimolecular reactions, they did not consider a possible break down of their two key assumptions, that is, thermal equilibrium between the initial and the transition state and neglecting recrossing, in imimolecular rate processes. The remarkable success of TST in the interpretation of kinetic effects of pressure [2] turned the attention of high-pressure kineticists away from a possible failure of TST and efforts were concentrated on the interpretation of the activation volume obtained from pressure dependence of a rate constant fe at a constant temperature (Eq. 3.1). 

The density of reactive states p( ) defined by Eq. (6) is the quantum mechanical analogue of the transition state theory p ( ) of Eq. (14). Transition state theory with quantum effects on the reaction coordinate motion and recrossing predicts that the CRP will increase in smooth steps of height kt at each energy level of the transition state and that p( ) will be a sum of bell-shaped curves, each centered at an energy E. We have found clear evidence for this prediction in the densities of reactive states p(E) that we have calculated by accurate quantum dynamics. 

The value of the transmission coefficient kt is shown for each feature in Table 2. (The value of kt for the last feature is greater than 1 because it includes contributions from higher energy transition states that have not been included in the fit.) Many of the values of the transmission coefficients are very close to unity, suggesting that these features correspond to quantized transition states that are nearly ideal dynamical bottlenecks to the reactive flux. Several of the values of kt deviate from unity this could be the result of the assumption of parabolic effective potential barriers or from recrossing or other multidimensional effects. 

In this spirit, we will also briefly describe the basis for some of the microscopic kinetic theories of unimolecular reaction rates that have arisen from nonlinear dynamics. Unlike the classical versions of Rice-Ramsperger-Kassel-Marcus (RRKM) theory and transition state theory, these theories explicitly take into account nonstatistical dynamical effects such as barrier recrossing, quasiperiodic trapping (both of which generally slow down the reaction rate), and other interesting effects. The implications for quantum dynamics are currently an active area of investigation. 

---