Transfer function simulation

Dynamic models expressed in terms of transform functions can be solved by digital simulation by transposing the transfer function into an equivalent set of differential equations, as shown by Ord-Smith and Stephenson (1975) and by Matko et al. (1992). Also some languages include special transfer function subroutines. 

Simulation example TRANSIM is based on the solution of a complex transfer function. 

This is based on the example of Matko, Korba and Zupancic (1), who describe methods of simulating process transform functions, based on partitioned and nested forms of solution. Here the process transfer function is given by... 

We will not write out the entire closed-loop function C/R, or in this case, T/Tsp. The main reason is that our design and analysis will be based on only the characteristic equation. The closed-loop function is only handy to do time domain simulation, which can be computed easily using MATLAB. Saying that, we do need to analysis the closed-loop transfer function for several simple cases so we have abetter theoretical understanding. 

For useful applications, lsimo is what we need to simulate response to, say, a rectangular pulse. This is one simple example using the same transfer function and time vector that we have just defined ... 

Jury, W.A. (1982). Simulation of solute transport using a transfer function model. Water Resources Research 18(2), pp. 363-368. 

Dynamic problems expressed in transfer function form are often very easily reformulated back into sets of differential equation and associated time delay functions. An example of this is shown in the simulation example TRANSIM. 

There are no sign changes in the first column, so the system is openloop stable. This finding should be no great shock since, from our simulations, we know the openloop system is stable. We also can see by inspection of Eq. (10.19) that the three poles of the openloop transfer function are located at —1 in the LHP, which is the stable region. 

Simulate several first-order lag and second-order lag plus deadlime processes on a digital computer with a relay feedback. Compare the ultimate gains and frequencies obtained by the auto-tune method with the real values of cu and obtained from the transfer function. 

Figures 2 to 4 are simulations with no adjustable parameters except v,2 and c-j. These simulations, which essentially correspond to Ideal mixing of the mixed micelles, generally underestimate the transfer functions. Better fits are obtained, at least at high m. If the parameters and are adjusted. These new parameters are...

Table III. Parameters for Simulations of Transfer Functions of NaDec ...

There are many reasons why deconvolution algorithms produce unsatisfactory results. In the deconvolution of actual spectral data, the presence of noise is usually the limiting factor. For the purpose of examining the deconvolution process, we begin with noiseless data, which, of course, can be realized only in a simulation process. When other aspects of deconvolution, such as errors in the system response function or errors in base-line removal, are examined, noiseless data are used. The presence of noise together with base-line or system transfer function errors will, of course, produce less valuable results. 

Studies on molecular recognition by artificial receptors are thus one of the most important approaches to such characterization in relation to supramolecular chemistry [4]. Functional simulation of intracellular receptors in aqueous media has been actively carried out with attention to various noncovalent host-guest interactions, such as hydrophobic, electrostatic, hydrogen-bonding, charge-transfer, and van der Waals modes [5-10]. On the other hand, molecular recognition by artificial cell-surface receptors embedded in supramolecular assemblies has been scarcely studied up to the present time, except for channel-linked receptors [11-13]. 

Conserved core genes, large viruses and, 382 Contrast transfer function (CTF), 94-95 cryoelectron microscopy and, 44 E function simulation and, 96 in subnanometer resolution reconstruction, 104... 

Fig. 9. Experimental (A)-(C) and corresponding simulated (A )-(C ) coherence-transfer functions for broadband, selective, and two-step selective Hartmann-Hahn transfer in the spin system of 1,2-dibromo-propanoic acid. The experimental coherence-transfer functions in (A), (B), and (C) are cross sections through the experimental spectra at the resonance frequencies of spins A, M, and X in Fig. 8. Experimental details are given in the caption to Fig. 8. (Adapted from Glaser and Drobny, 1991, courtesy of Elsevier Science.)...

A number of theoretical transfer functions have been reported for specific experiments. However, analytical expressions were derived only for the simplest Hartmann-Hahn experiments. For heteronuclear Hartmann-Hahn transfer based on two CW spin-lock fields on resonance, Maudsley et al. (1977) derived magnetization-transfer functions for two coupled spins 1/2 for matched and mismatched rf fields [see Eq. (30)]. In IS, I2S, and I S systems, all coherence transfer functions were derived for on-resonance irradiation including mismatched rf fields. More general magnetization-transfer functions for off-resonance irradiation and Hartmann-Hahn mismatch were derived for Ij S systems with N < 6 (Muller and Ernst, 1979 Chingas et al., 1981 Levitt et al., 1986). Analytical expressions of heteronuclear Hartmann-Hahn transfer functions under the average Hamiltonian, created by the WALTZ-16, DIPSI-2, and MLEV-16 sequences (see Section XI), have been presented by Ernst et al. (1991) for on-resonant irradiation with matched rf fields. Numerical simulations of heteronuclear polarization-transfer functions for the WALTZ-16 and WALTZ-17 sequence have also been reported for various frequency offsets (Ernst et al., 1991). 

---