Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Tower impact

There are several types of wet collectors including spray towers, packed towers, and wet centrifugal collectors. The spray tower is a cylindrical or rectangular tower into which the incoming air is passed. Highspeed water sprays in the tower impact and remove the dust that is subsequently separated from the droplets by various types of eliminators. Spray towers are effective for all kinds of dust and even moisture-laden gases. [Pg.136]

The HILL-SCAN 30XX boards can be used in different PCs. Desktop- and tower-PCs as well suited for laboratory uses. For in-field inspections rugged notebooks and portable PCs are advantageous. A typical portable system is shown in Fig. 2 (USPC 3010), used in MUSE (Mobile Ultrasonic Equipment). This portable PC not only contains the boards for ultrasonic testing but also a controller with power supply for stepper motors, so that a manipulator can be connected directly. The MUSE system is enlarged with a water circulation system which enables a local immersion technique" for in-field inspections. A typical result is shown in Fig. 3, which presents a D-scan of a CFRP- component in RTM-techniques. The defect area caused by an impact is clearly indicated. The manipulator is described in [3]. [Pg.859]

Includes cyclonic, dynamic, filtration, inertial impaction (wetted targets, packed towers, turbulent targets), spray chambers, and venturi. [Pg.386]

Reboiler. The case shown in Figure 8 is common for reboilers and condensers on distillation towers. Typically, this AThas a greater impact on excess energy use in distillation than does reflux beyond the minimum. The capital cost of the reboiler and condenser is often equivalent to the cost of the column they serve. [Pg.88]

In drying towers of sulfur-burning plants, mesh pads or inertial impaction-type mist eliminators are usually adequate. High efficiency mist eliminators are usually used in drying towers of spent acid or metallurgical plants. [Pg.188]

In distillation towers, entrainment lowers the tray efficiency, and 1 pound of entrainment per 10 pounds of liquid is sometimes taken as the hmit for acceptable performance. However, the impact of entrainment on distiUation efficiency depends on the relative volatility of the component being considered. Entrainment has a minor impact on close separations when the difference between vapor and liquid concentration is smaU, but this factor can be dominant for systems where the liquid concentration is much higher than the vapor in equilibrium with it (i.e., when a component of the liquid has a very lowvolatiUty, as in an absorber). [Pg.1412]

PM Impingement-plate tower collection efficiencies range from 50 to 99 percent, depending upon the application. This type of scrubber relies almost exclusively on inertial impaction for PM collection. Therefore, collection efficiency decreases as particle size decreases. Short residence times will also lower scrubber efficiency for small particles. Collection efficiencies for small particles (< 1 fim in aerodynamic diameter) are low for these scrubbers hence, they are not recommended for fine PM control. [Pg.455]

Random packing has traditionally been used in small diameter ( t in.) towers. This is because it is easier and le.ss expensive to pack t small diameter towers. However, random packed beds are prone to c neling and have poor turndown characteristics when compared i trays. For these reasons, trays were preferred for tower diameters greater than 20 in. In recent years an improved understanding of the impact of... [Pg.148]

Ryan et. al. [185] examined the prediction of misting and bubbling in towers, tray and packed, and assessed the impact. [Pg.45]

Metal and plastic packing can be dumped dry into the tower however, reasonable care must be exercised, and the drop should not be more than 10-15 ft, using a chute with a cloth sock (open) on the end to cushion the impact. [Pg.272]

The aircraft that hit one of the WTC towers was carrying about 28 500 kg of JP4 liquid aviation fuel. Three fireballs were seen following impact. They achieved a maximum diameter of 60 m each. NIST estimates that 10-25 % of the fuel burned in the fireballs. Make a quantitative estimate of the fuel that burned in these fireballs and see if NIST is correct. Take the density of the JP4 vapor at 20 °C to be 2.5kg/m3. Its liquid density is 760kg/m3. [Pg.338]

Droplet size and interfacial area. In the absence of interfacial effects accompanying mass transfer, the droplets break down by impact with elements of packing and finally reach an equilibrium size which is independent of the packing size. Conversely, small droplets gradually coalesce until the equilibrium size is attained. Pratt and his coworkers 5 29 showed that the mean droplet size attained in the tower is well represented by ... [Pg.757]


See other pages where Tower impact is mentioned: [Pg.569]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.433]    [Pg.569]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.433]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.391]    [Pg.402]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.398]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.1433]    [Pg.1440]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.532]    [Pg.532]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.725]    [Pg.871]    [Pg.618]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.513]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.490]    [Pg.1100]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.337]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.160]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.56 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info