Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Total reduction current

Figure 7.104 shows the plot of the value of J vs. S obtained for different potentials on the bare iron region from the data plotted in Fig. 7.103. A straight line obtained with an intercept much greater than 1 indicates that Oz reduction on reduced iron proceeds by the direct four-electron reaction pathway. Formation of HjOj as an intermediate in the consecutive reaction pathway is less than 1 % of the total reduction current Conversely, in the potential region corresponding to passive iron, the slope, S, of the /disk//ring plot is zero, and the intercept J = (l/N) indicates that 02 reduction on passive Fe is a two-electron process in which is the product, and not an intermediate, of the reaction. Figure 7.104 shows the plot of the value of J vs. S obtained for different potentials on the bare iron region from the data plotted in Fig. 7.103. A straight line obtained with an intercept much greater than 1 indicates that Oz reduction on reduced iron proceeds by the direct four-electron reaction pathway. Formation of HjOj as an intermediate in the consecutive reaction pathway is less than 1 % of the total reduction current Conversely, in the potential region corresponding to passive iron, the slope, S, of the /disk//ring plot is zero, and the intercept J = (l/N) indicates that 02 reduction on passive Fe is a two-electron process in which is the product, and not an intermediate, of the reaction.
When the metals are coupled, conservation of charge requires that the total oxidation current must equal the total reduction current, LIox = SIre(i. Thus> the two oxidation and the two reduction curves must... [Pg.166]

Correcting for Residual Current In any quantitative analysis the signal due to the analyte must be corrected for signals arising from other sources. The total measured current in any voltammetric experiment, itot> consists of two parts that due to the analyte s oxidation or reduction, and a background, or residual, current, ir. [Pg.521]

Fig. 10.6 Polarisation diagram showing the limited role hydrogen evolution plays at the corrosion potential of steel in aerated neutral solution, the larger role in determining cathodic protection currents and the dominant role in contributing to current requirements at very negative potenitals. The dotted line shows the total cathodic current due to oxygen reduction and... Fig. 10.6 Polarisation diagram showing the limited role hydrogen evolution plays at the corrosion potential of steel in aerated neutral solution, the larger role in determining cathodic protection currents and the dominant role in contributing to current requirements at very negative potenitals. The dotted line shows the total cathodic current due to oxygen reduction and...
Copper(II) ions in the presence of chloride ions are reduced at the dropping mercury electrode (dme) in two steps, Cu(II) -> Cu(I) and Cu(I) -> Cu(0) producing a double wave at -1-0.04 and 0.22 V versus sce half-wave potentials. In the presence of peroxydisulphate , when the chloride concentration is large enough, two waves are also observed the first limiting current corresponds to the reduction of the Cu(II) to Cu(I) plus reduction of a fraction of peroxydisulphate and the total diffusion current at a more negative potential is equal to the sum of the diffusion currents of reduction of Cu(II) to Cu(0) and of the peroxydisulphate. There is evidence that peroxydisulphate is not reduced at the potential of the first wave because of the adsorption of the copper(I) chloride complex at... [Pg.547]

The calibrated m/z = 44 and m/z = 60 ion currents were converted into the respective partial reaction faradaic currents as described above, and are plotted in Fig. 13.3c as dashed (m/z = 44) and dash-dotted (m/z = 60) lines, using electron numbers of 6 electrons per CO2 molecule and 4 electrons per formic acid molecule formation. The calculated partial current for complete methanol oxidation to CO2 contributes only about one-half of the measured faradaic current. The partial current of methanol oxidation to formic acid is in the range of a few percent of the total methanol oxidation current. The remaining difference, after subtracting the PtO formation/reduction currents and pseudocapacitive contributions as described above, is plotted in Fig. 13.3c (top panel) as a dotted line. As mentioned above (see the beginning of Section 13.3.2), we attribute this current difference to the partial current of methanol oxidation to formaldehyde. This way, we were able to extract the partial currents of all three major products during methanol oxidation reaction, which are otherwise not accessible. [Pg.433]

The total ion current (TIC) can either be measured by a hardware TIC monitor before mass analysis, or it can be reconstructed by the data system from the spectra after mass analysis. [27] Thus, the TIC represents a measure of the overall intensity of ion production or of mass spectral output as a function of time, respectively. The TIC obtained by means of data reduction, [28] i.e., by mathematical construction from the mass spectra as successively acquired while the sample evaporates, is also termed total ion chromatogram (TIC). For this purpose, the sum of all ion intensities belonging to each of the spectra is plotted as a function of time or scan number, respectively. [Pg.214]

GC-MS runs were stored as files by the data system on discs FORTRAN routines were written to compare selected parameters in file sets and to reduce the data to summary tables for hard copy output. These routines facilitated the determination of peak areas of components in extracted ion current profiles (EICP) for both total and selected ion chromatograms, calculated the removal of components of interest (e.g., those containing halogen isotopes) by treatment processes (GAC, CI2) or derivatization, summarized the occurrence of new components of interest in treatment or derivatization, and calculated the percent of the total ion current represented by a given component. The programs allowed operator discrimination between major and minor components in a file set by preselection of an ion current threshhold for data reduction. For data summarized herein, components were >4000 ion counts, which corresponds to a level >5 of the internal standard (decachlorobiphenyl) response. [Pg.625]

If the cathodic partial current is larger than the anodic partial current, a total cathodic or reduction current will flow through the electrochemical interface, and vice versa. If both anodic and cathodic partial processes at an electrode are balanced, that is both partial currents are equal, no net reaction will take place at the electrode and no total net current will be observed through the external circuit. However, both... [Pg.7]

Upon further increase of voltage, the current reaches I Ed and begins to increase again. This increase is not due to the oxidation of the primary iron species, but rather results from the contribution of the reduction of protons (5.4) or oxidation of water (5.5) to the total cell current. [Pg.104]

Numerous studies have been made on the electrochemical reduction of CO2 under high pressure on various electrodes in an aqueous electrolyte. Productivity increases substantially at 30 bar of CO2 with respect to that at 1 bar of CO2. However, the total cathodic current barely increases with increasing CO2 pressure. In terms of products, CO, H2, and formic acid are mainly observed. A fast deactivation is also typically present. [Pg.386]

In this expression, i is current density, p is density, n is the number of electron equivalents per mole of dissolved metal, M is the atomic weight of the metal, F is Faraday s constant, r is pit radius, and t is time. The advantage of this technique is that a direct determination of the dissolution kinetics is obtained. A direct determination of this type is not possible by electrochemical methods, in which the current recorded is a net current representing the difference between the anodic and the cathodic reaction rates. In fact, a comparison of this nonelectrochemical growth rate determination with a comparable electrochemical growth rate determination shows that the partial cathodic current due to proton reduction in a growing pit in A1 is about 15% of the total anodic current (26). [Pg.267]

The same reactions occur at the corresponding n-type electrode (Fig. 8.12). In the anodic range, the total current remains very small upon addition of the redox system. However, it is determined by two partial currents, namely the cathodic reduction current and the anodic decomposition current, as can be proved analytically. A description in terms of quasi-Fermi levels has already been given in Section 7.4.1. [Pg.255]

On addition of phenylhydrazine, the polarogram of [Ru" L(H20)] split into three closely separated peaks (Figure 2A.d) with the enhancement of the total diffusion current. The E1/2S of those reduction steps were measured to be -0.155, -0.233 and -0.407 V respectively. The E1/4-E3/4 values of these waves were 30, 55 and 60 mV indicating the first wave was two-electron and remaining two steps were one electron each. The wave analysis data showed the electrode reactions at these potentials were diffusion controlled and reversible. At higher concentrations of phenylhydrazine, there has been no change in peak potentials except the increase of height of the diffusion currents. [Pg.522]


See other pages where Total reduction current is mentioned: [Pg.153]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.2431]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.442]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.471]    [Pg.491]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.2186]    [Pg.482]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.2696]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.170]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.166 ]




SEARCH



Current reduction

Total current

© 2024 chempedia.info