Total error controls

While methods validation and accuracy testing considerations presented here have been frequently discussed in the literature, they have been included here to emphasize their importance in the design of a total quality control protocol. The Youden two sample quality control scheme has been adapted for continuous analytical performance surveillance. Methods for graphical display of systematic and random error patterns have been presented with simulated performance data. Daily examination of the T, D, and Q quality control plots may be used to assess analytical performance. Once identified, patterns in the quality control plots can be used to assist in the diagnosis of a problem. Patterns of behavior in the systematic error contribution are more frequent and easy to diagnose. However, pattern complications in both error domains are observed and simultaneous events in both T and D plots can help to isolate the problems. Point-by-point comparisons of T and D plots should be made daily (immediately after the data are generated). Early detection of abnormal behavior reduces the possibility that large numbers of samples will require reanalysis. 

Step 6 allows us to create a statistical approach for the evaluation of the collected data. Using a statistical test and the statistical parameters selected in Step 6, we will be able to control decision error and make decisions with a certain level of confidence. Decision error, like total error, can only be minimized, but never entirely eliminated. However, we can control this error by setting a tolerable level of risk of an incorrect decision. Conducting Step 6 enables the planning team to specify acceptable probabilities of making an error (the tolerable limits on decision errors). At this step of the DQO process, the project team will address the following issues ... 

The planning team will devise measures for control or minimization of decision error through controlling total error. To do this, the planning team may need the expertise of a statistician who will develop a data collection design with a tolerable probability for the occurrence of a decision error. 

We first decide on the critical differences that should be detected For convenience, we take as a basis the GLIA 88 demand, which amounts to 0.5mmol/L throughout the analytical measurement range. Notice that CLIA 88 demands relate to the total error in relation to a target value of a quality control sample ... 

These guidelines were established after considering levels of accuracy and imprecision that are achievable in well-controlled research and clinical laboratories."" A laboratory can approximate its conformance to the total error recommendations using the following equation ... 

The total error of a measurement takes into account both the systematic error (bias) and the random error components. Any measurement that is made during an experiment consists of both of these error parameters, and it is not possible to separate these two. Therefore, it is scientifically correct to use the total error criteria to assess the acceptability of a quality control result during a run. 

Assessment of the sources of error affecting the accuracy of the machine tool (MT) can be divided into quasi-static errors and dynamic errors. Quasi-static errors are errors in the machine that occur relatively slowly. This category is formed by geometric and kinematic error, thermal errors, etc [1]. However, dynamic errors are caused by structural vibration, spindle error motion, controller errors, etc. Unlike the quasi-static errors, these errors are more dependent on the working conditions of the machine. Overall, quasi-static errors account for about 70 percent of the total errors of a machine [2]. 

The CRA was applied to hnd the values of the gain constants ki, ks involved in the equation that achieves the tracking controller. In this stage of the project, the total errors were smaller than the errors reached by means of GAs. 

The layer between cell 3 and explosion products-air interface contains 80% of the total mass of the products. Therefore, one may assume that at To > 25 cm 80% of the products behave as an equilibrium mixture while the chemical energy evolved in it differs from that calculated using the equilibrium model by no more than 2%. Contribution of the remaining cells located near the center (Figs. 7 and 8) to the error in calculations of q does not exceed 2% also (because of a small mass of the products in them) despite the fax t that the discrepancy between the equilibrium and kinetics-controlled values of q in these regions may reach 50%. Thus, the total error occasioned by... 

In this study, no pilot read-back (i.e., the lack of a pilot read-back) accounted for approximately 25% of the total pilot-controller communication errors. The study highlighted the pilot expectation as the most common factor for the occurrence of errors related to no pilot read-back. 

Hear-back errors type II. These are controller errors in which the pilot correctly repeats the issued clearance, but the controller fails to notice that the issued clearance was not what the controller intended to issue. In this study, this type of error accoimted for approximately 18% of the total pilot-controller commimication errors. 

Miscellaneous errors. These are those errors that cannot be grouped under the above three types of errors. In this study, this type of errors accounted for approximately 10% of the total pilot-controller communication errors. 

Sociotechnical approach (control of error through changes in management policy and culture) Occupational/process safety Effects of organizational factors on safety Policy aspects Culture Interviews Surveys Organizational redesign Total Quality Management More frequent in recent years... 

---