Tolerance behavioral

With tethering technology, immobilized Rh(DiPFc) catalyst, a veiy selective hydrogenation catalyst was developed by Engelhard (26) and Chirotech (27). Rh(DiPFc)(COD)BF4 is one of most interesting homogeneous catalysts due to its chemo-selectivity and sulfur tolerant behavior. The anchored complex y-... 

Catalysts As any catalyst manufacturer will divulge, there are clear differences in the metals tolerance behavior of different catalyst grades. Catalysts are often designed to be tolerant to a specific metal, such as Davison s Ni tolerant technology. Thus, in addition to the ability to... 

Types of Tolerance Explanations of Tolerance Behavioral Pharmacology Reinforcement and Punishment Operant Principles and Drug Dependence Drug Discrimination Conflict Paradigm... 

Pharmacokinetic (dispositional or Pharmacodynamic Learned tolerance Behavioral Conditioned Acute tolerance Reverse tolerance (sensitization) Cross-tolerance metabolic)... 

Undesirable Effects Adrenal suppression (insufficiency upon withdrawal), Cushing s Syndrome (osteoporosis, skin atrophy, central fat distribution, abnormal glucose tolerance, behavioral abnormalities), suppression of somatic growth, osteopenia and bone fractures. 

Studies performed by Yuan et al. on conductive polyaniline (PANI) nanofibers, P3DOT, and CNT thin films show that aU three are capable of forming highly compliant electrodes with fault tolerant behavior [225]. Nanowires and tubes are of particular interest since they are capable of maintaining a percolation network at large strains, thus reducing the required electrode thickness while still allowing for maximum strain performance. 

FIGURE 18.7 A material showing R curve behavior (bold curve) exhibits a region of stable crack growth and flaw tolerant behavior. The lighter curves Gi and 02 represent typical Griffith behavior. 

Several coatings for oxide ceramic fibers have enabled model composite systems to demonstrate damage tolerant behavior. However, no fiber coatings have been proven to be effective in actual (as opposed to model) oxide composite systems. 

In addition to a formal specification, we need a technique to analyze the fault tolerance behavior of a component in a formal way. Approaches such as [19] verify formalized fault trees against formal implementation models. Furthe-more, several fault injection analyzes that rely on model checking like [3] and [9] have been presented. In this paper we focus on a fault injection based-technique [16], [10] that is called model-based safety analysis MBS A. The MBS A processes functional requirements and provides complete results as cut-sets and allows to define custom faulty behavior in the implementation model, which is specified using Matlab/Statefiow. Cut-sets are unique combinations of malfunctions occurrences that can cause a system failure. A cut-set is said to be minimal if no event can be removed from the set and the combination of malfunctions still leads to a failure[ll]. 

---