Thickness vs. time for

Fig. 11.14 Thickness vs. time for parabolic and linear oxidation laws.

Figure 2.41 Pressure and reaction zone thickness vs. time for a 2.5 fim radius hot spot driving spherically divergent detonation in nitromethane. The calculation was performed using 100-A mesh.

Figure 11. Log (1/ct) vs. time for a thick graphite laminate (192 ply) catalyzed epoxy monitored during cure in the autoclave.

Curves of deflection vs. time for two different thicknesses of the PVC/PV Ac copolymer are shown in Figure 15. The upper curve represents two experimental tests on 0.030-inch thick samples. The lower curve represents three tests on the thinner 0.010-inch samples. The difference between the deflection vs. time curves for the two thicknesses is in the direction one would expect if gas accumulation were causing the increased creep rates during irradiation. The two samples show... 

In Fig 5, curve B is the observed firing data curve A is drawn for comparison purposes and would be the curve obtained from a constant burning rate over the same period of time. The plots of proplnt thickness vs time are indicative that the burning rate is not constant during burning time, but that variations do occur... 

FIGURE 2. The absorbance at 508 nm vs. time for four thin films of the polyurethane synthesized by equation 3. Only the sample exposed to both light and air degraded. The absorbance at 508 nm is characteristic of the metal-metal bond. The differences in absorbance at time = 0 are due to different thicknesses of the various samples. 

Fig. 3.9. Measured film thickness h vs. time for C10EO5 solution at CMC/3 (squares) ho - thickness...

Fig. 38. Gold plating thickness vs. time curves at various cyanide concentrations for substrate-catalyzed gold deposition with hydrazine as reducing agent (C. D. lacovangelo et al., 1991 [167]).

Figure 1. Schematic of film thickness or gain in weight per unit area vs. time for oxidation of a pure metal where diffusion is rate controlling. The kinetics are denoted as parabolic oxidation kinetics.

Fig. 11.15 Oxide thickness vs. time observed for logarithmic and inverse logarithmic rate laws.

As a consequence of using suitable transducers inside a filter cell, it is possible to evaluate transient cake thickness during a filtration. Figure E.2 shows some cake thickness vs. time data, again for calcite and talc, at different... 

Fig. 2. Upper panel acJsorption kinetics for a 0.02 mg/ml PLL- -PEG solution in HEPES 2 as measured by OWLS (adsorbed mass vs time, line) and VASE (layer thickness vs time. ). 17 min is needed to reach a plateau value in the adsorption curve. Lower panel direct comparison of layer thickness from VASE and EG monomer surface daisity derived from OWLS measurem ts for different adsorption times. A good correlation was found betweai both techniques, allowing for a convCTsion of adsorbed thickness into EG monomer surface density rec-...

Fig. 5 Inter metal lie layer thickness vs. time at 215 °C (419 °F) reflov, from Schaefer et al. (Ref 22) and Kang et al. (Ref 31). For Schaefer s data, in one case, the solder did not contain Cu at time zero, and in the other case, the solder is saturated with Cu at time zero. The plots are produced from the curve-fitted parameters in Ref 22.

Figure 23. Thickness vs. time during the passive oxide growth for 900 s at 0.80 V vs. Ag/AgCk/ Sat. KCl in pH 8.4 horate solution containing Fe ions at concentration of 0.0, 0.25 and 0.50 mM. Reprint from T. Ohtsuka and H. Yamada, Effect of Ferrous Ion in Solution on the Formation of Anodic Oxide Film on Iron , Corrosion Sci., 40 (1998) 1131, Copyright 1998 with permission from Elsevier Science.

Figure 4. (a) Thickness vs. time plots for spin cast resist films with varying concentrations of PAC (b) Dissolution rate as a function of increasing PAC concentration. 

Fig. 1. Theoretical (thick lines) log(N/0) vs. time (left panels) and log(N/0) vs. log(0/H)+12 (right panels) compared to 2-

Solubility Rate Measurements. Solubility rates, Sr, were determined by measuring PBS film thickness as a function of development time. PBS films coated on silicon wafers were broken into several pieces. Each piece was dipped into n-butyl acetate, BuAc, and the development time measured. The film was rinsed in isopropanol and baked at 120 C for 30 minutes to remove residual solvents. Film thickness was measured by interferometry. The temperature of the developer, BuAc, was controlled at 2S C O.OS C and the developer was not stirred or agitated during the deydopment process. Plot of film thickness vs. development time were linear for low Mw films. Films having M, greater than 400,000 g/mole did not completely dissolve in BuAc. 

Figure 5. Dissipation factor D at 1 MHz vs. time at a specified temperature for a 1-ftm thick polyimide film.

Fig. 7.2 ZnO film thickness vs. deposition time for different values of solution pH. (Adapted from Ref. 52.)... 

The effect of the thickness of gel film on the contraction response time is shown in Fig. 8. When the thickness was 10 pm the contraction response time was about 0.2 s which is almost the same speed as the contraction of skeletal muscle in animals. The typical curve of contraction is also shown. Figure 9 shows the result of contraction ratio vs load for gels made under different conditions. The higher the elasticity the higher is the contraction ratio under loading. Perpendicular type gels showed a comparatively high contraction ratio, and Parallel ... 

The intensity of the crystalline bands was monitored simultaneously during the crystallization. To correct for changes in density or thickness in the different samples, the intensities were normalized by the reference band. These normalized intensities were plotted vs. log time for each of the blends at the different crystallization temperatures. The curves obtained are sigmoidal in nature and they level off when the final crystallinity is achieved. A typical curve for the normalized intensity of the 848-cm-1 band vs. log time is plotted in Figure 7 for PET. 

---