Thickness vs. time

FIGURE 6.11 Representative baildown testing curve results using Gruszenski s (1987) method. Graphs of depth to product and depth to the product-water interface vs. time (a), and product thickness vs. time (b) are produced. 

Figure 10. A Plot of thickness vs time in developer derived from a laser end-point detector trace. The thickness change between maxima is a function of the laser wavelength and the index of refraction of the resist at that...

In Fig 5, curve B is the observed firing data curve A is drawn for comparison purposes and would be the curve obtained from a constant burning rate over the same period of time. The plots of proplnt thickness vs time are indicative that the burning rate is not constant during burning time, but that variations do occur... 

Fig. 3.7. Film thickness vs. time of film thinning at various film radii curve 1 - r = 0.05 mm curve 2 -...

Fig. 2. Oxidation of four faces of a copper single crystal at 178°C. Thickness vs Time.

Fig. 1. PBTMSS film thickness vs. time during RIE and SME at 20 mTorr 02- Bias A -350 V B -450 V C -550 V D sputter mode etch (SME) at 75 W.

Fig. 38. Gold plating thickness vs. time curves at various cyanide concentrations for substrate-catalyzed gold deposition with hydrazine as reducing agent (C. D. lacovangelo et al., 1991 [167]).

Figure 2.18 Silicon dioxide thickness vs time of oxidation of 4H-SiC substrate with porous layer on it. Reproduced from S. Soloviev et al., Materials Science Forum, 389-393, 1113-1116. Copyright (2002), with permission from Trans Tech Publications...

Fig. 11.14 Thickness vs. time for parabolic and linear oxidation laws.

Fig. 11.15 Oxide thickness vs. time observed for logarithmic and inverse logarithmic rate laws.

As a consequence of using suitable transducers inside a filter cell, it is possible to evaluate transient cake thickness during a filtration. Figure E.2 shows some cake thickness vs. time data, again for calcite and talc, at different... 

I 1] An example of comparisons between theoretical cake thickness vs. time and... 

Fig. 2. Upper panel acJsorption kinetics for a 0.02 mg/ml PLL- -PEG solution in HEPES 2 as measured by OWLS (adsorbed mass vs time, line) and VASE (layer thickness vs time. ). 17 min is needed to reach a plateau value in the adsorption curve. Lower panel direct comparison of layer thickness from VASE and EG monomer surface daisity derived from OWLS measurem ts for different adsorption times. A good correlation was found betweai both techniques, allowing for a convCTsion of adsorbed thickness into EG monomer surface density rec-...

Figure 2.41 Pressure and reaction zone thickness vs. time for a 2.5 fim radius hot spot driving spherically divergent detonation in nitromethane. The calculation was performed using 100-A mesh.

Fig. 5 Inter metal lie layer thickness vs. time at 215 °C (419 °F) reflov, from Schaefer et al. (Ref 22) and Kang et al. (Ref 31). For Schaefer s data, in one case, the solder did not contain Cu at time zero, and in the other case, the solder is saturated with Cu at time zero. The plots are produced from the curve-fitted parameters in Ref 22.

Figure 23. Thickness vs. time during the passive oxide growth for 900 s at 0.80 V vs. Ag/AgCk/ Sat. KCl in pH 8.4 horate solution containing Fe ions at concentration of 0.0, 0.25 and 0.50 mM. Reprint from T. Ohtsuka and H. Yamada, Effect of Ferrous Ion in Solution on the Formation of Anodic Oxide Film on Iron , Corrosion Sci., 40 (1998) 1131, Copyright 1998 with permission from Elsevier Science.

Figure 4. (a) Thickness vs. time plots for spin cast resist films with varying concentrations of PAC (b) Dissolution rate as a function of increasing PAC concentration. 

---