Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Theoretical methods potential-energy surface

There are significant differences between tliese two types of reactions as far as how they are treated experimentally and theoretically. Photodissociation typically involves excitation to an excited electronic state, whereas bimolecular reactions often occur on the ground-state potential energy surface for a reaction. In addition, the initial conditions are very different. In bimolecular collisions one has no control over the reactant orbital angular momentum (impact parameter), whereas m photodissociation one can start with cold molecules with total angular momentum 0. Nonetheless, many theoretical constructs and experimental methods can be applied to both types of reactions, and from the point of view of this chapter their similarities are more important than their differences. [Pg.870]

The fitting parameters in the transfomi method are properties related to the two potential energy surfaces that define die electronic resonance. These curves are obtained when the two hypersurfaces are cut along theyth nomial mode coordinate. In order of increasing theoretical sophistication these properties are (i) the relative position of their minima (often called the displacement parameters), (ii) the force constant of the vibration (its frequency), (iii) nuclear coordinate dependence of the electronic transition moment and (iv) the issue of mode mixing upon excitation—known as the Duschinsky effect—requiring a multidimensional approach. [Pg.1201]

In Chapter VI, Ohm and Deumens present their electron nuclear dynamics (END) time-dependent, nonadiabatic, theoretical, and computational approach to the study of molecular processes. This approach stresses the analysis of such processes in terms of dynamical, time-evolving states rather than stationary molecular states. Thus, rovibrational and scattering states are reduced to less prominent roles as is the case in most modem wavepacket treatments of molecular reaction dynamics. Unlike most theoretical methods, END also relegates electronic stationary states, potential energy surfaces, adiabatic and diabatic descriptions, and nonadiabatic coupling terms to the background in favor of a dynamic, time-evolving description of all electrons. [Pg.770]

Computer simulation techniques offer the ability to study the potential energy surfaces of chemical reactions to a high degree of quantitative accuracy [4]. Theoretical studies of chemical reactions in the gas phase are a major field and can provide detailed insights into a variety of processes of fundamental interest in atmospheric and combustion chemistry. In the past decade theoretical methods were extended to the study of reaction processes in mesoscopic systems such as enzymatic reactions in solution, albeit to a more approximate level than the most accurate gas-phase studies. [Pg.221]

Before discussing the kinds of kinetic information provided by potential energy surfaces we will briefly consider methods for calculating these surfaces, without going into detail, for theoretical calculations are outside the scope of this treatment. Detailed procedures are given by Eyring et ah There are three approaches to the problem. The most basic one is purely theoretical, in the sense that it uses only fundamental physical quantities, such as electronic charge. The next level is the semiempirical approach, which introduces experimental data into the calculations in a limited way. The third approach, the empirical one, makes extensive use of experimental results. [Pg.193]

A fully theoretical calculation of a potential energy surface must be a quantum mechanical calculation, and the mathematical difflculties associated with the method require that approximations be made. The first of these is the Bom-Oppenheimer approximation, which states that it is acceptable to uncouple the electronic and nuclear motions. This is a consequence of the great disparity in the masses of the electron and nuclei. Therefore, the calculation can proceed by fixing the location... [Pg.193]

The hrst step in theoretical predictions of pathway branching are electronic structure ab initio) calculations to define at least the lowest Born-Oppenheimer electronic potential energy surface for a system. For a system of N atoms, the PES has (iN — 6) dimensions, and is denoted V Ri,R2, - , RiN-6)- At a minimum, the energy, geometry, and vibrational frequencies of stationary points (i.e., asymptotes, wells, and saddle points where dV/dRi = 0) of the potential surface must be calculated. For the statistical methods described in Section IV.B, information on other areas of the potential are generally not needed. However, it must be stressed that failure to locate relevant stationary points may lead to omission of valid pathways. For this reason, as wide a search as practicable must be made through configuration space to ensure that the PES is sufficiently complete. Furthermore, a search only of stationary points will not treat pathways that avoid transition states. [Pg.225]

Experimental probes of Born-Oppenheimer breakdown under conditions where large amplitude vibrational motion can occur are now becoming available. One approach to this problem is to compare theoretical predictions and experimental observations for reactive properties that are sensitive to the Born-Oppenheimer potential energy surface. Particularly useful for this endeavor are recombinative desorption and Eley-Rideal reactions. In both cases, gas-phase reaction products may be probed by modern state-specific detection methods, providing detailed characterization of the product reaction dynamics. Theoretical predictions based on Born-Oppenheimer potential energy surfaces should be capable of reproducing experiment. Observed deviations between experiment and theory may be attributed to Born-Oppenheimer breakdown. [Pg.392]

The semiempirical nature of the methods used to construct multidimensional potential energy surfaces makes the quantitative validity of the results questionable. Hence the present state of the theoretical calculation of activation energies is unsatisfactory. [Pg.115]

The third principle relates to the set of equations which describe the potential energy surface of the molecule. These potential energy equations, derived primarily from classical physics, contain parameters optimized to obtain the best match between experimental data and/or theoretical results for a training set of compounds. Once the parameters are evaluated for a set of structures (as diverse as possible), they are fixed and then used unmodified for other similar (and usually larger) compounds. As a first approximation, these parameters must be transferable from one structure to another for this method to work and be generally applicable. [Pg.40]

On the other hand, many theoretical methods have been employed to elucidate the potential energy surface of the C4H7+ in gas phase (15,16) and in solution (77). High-level ab initio calculations suggest that, in gas phase, there are three C4H7+ structures as minima on the potential energy surface (14). These calculations pointed to bicyclobutonium and cyclopropylcarbinyl as the most stable structures. [Pg.270]

Although the theoretical roots of this technique are very well established, it is more often used as a flexible surface which can be adjusted to lit either exprimental data or data established by better electronic-structure methods. The LEPS formalism has also been extensively used to explore the relationships between the potential energy surface and the details of chemical dynamics . Because of the widespread use of this potential for studying gas-phase reactions, the specific form of the equations will not be discussed here. The interested reader is instead referred to references which discuss this approach in more detail . ... [Pg.306]


See other pages where Theoretical methods potential-energy surface is mentioned: [Pg.201]    [Pg.879]    [Pg.3013]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.397]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.409]    [Pg.412]    [Pg.535]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.130]   


SEARCH



Energy methods

Potential energy surfaces methods

Surface method

Surface potential method

Theoretical Potential

Theoretical energy

Theoretical methods

© 2024 chempedia.info