The vanishing of apparent forces

The three principles of Newtonian tty-namics were taught to us in school. The first principle, that a free body (with no acting force) moves uniformly along a straight line, seems to be particularly simple. It was not so simple for Ernest Mach though. 

Ernest Mach (1838-1916), Austrian physicist and philosopher, professor at the Universities of Graz, Prague, and Vienna, godfather of Wolfgang Pauli. Mach investigated supersonic flows. In recognition of his achievements the velocity of sound in air (1224 km/hour) is called Mach 1. 

Albert Einstein (1879-1955) bom in Dim (Germany) studied at the ETH, Zurich. Considered by many as genius of all times. As a teenager and student, Einstein rejected many social conventions. This is why he was forced to begin his scientific career at a secondary position in the Federal Patent Office. Being afraid of his supervisor, he used to read books hidden in a drawer (he called it the Department of Physics ). 

This Bern Patent Office employee also knew about the dramatic dilemmas of Lorentz, which we will talk about in a moment. Einstein recalls that there was a clock at a tram stop in Bern. Whenever his tram moved away from the stop, the modest patent office clerk asked himself what would the clock show, if the tram had the velocity of light. While other passengers probably read their newspapers, Einstein had questions which led humanity on new pathways. 

Let us imagine two coordinate systems (each in ID) O at rest (we assume it inertial ) while the coordinate system O moves with respect to the first in a certain way (possibly very complicated). The position of the moving point may be measured in O giving the number x as the result, while in O on gets the result x. These numbers are related one to another (/ is a function of time t)  

---

The Vanishing of Apparent Forces The Galilean Transformation The Michelson-Morley Experiment The Galilean Transformation Crashes The Lorentz Transformation New Law of Adding Velocities The Minkowski Space-Time Continuum How do we Gel E =... 

Thus, the two bosons have an inereased probability density of being at the same point in spaee, while the two fermions have a vanishing probability density of being at the same point. This eonelusion also applies to systems with N identieal partieles. Identical bosons (fermions) behave as though they are under the influence of mutually attractive (repulsive) forces. These apparent forces are called exchange forces, although they are not forces in the mechanical sense, but rather statistical results. 

The results given above are essentially identical to those obtained by Hinch [10] by a similar method, except for the fact that Hinch did not retain any of the terms involving the force bias (tIv)o which he presumably assumed to vanish. An apparent contradiction in Hinch s results may be resolved by correcting his neglect of this bias. In a traditional interpretation of the Langevin equation as a limit of an underlying ODE, the bead velocities are rigorously independent of the hard components of the random forces, since the random forces in Eq. (2.291) appear contracted with K , which has nonzero components only in the soft subspace. Physically, the hard components of the random forces are instantaneously canceled by the constraint forces, and thus can have no effect... 

Hendlik Lorentz indicated fliat the Galilean transformation represents only one possibility of making the apparent forces vanish (i.e., assuring that A = D). Both constants need not equal 1. As it happens, such a generalization was found by an intriguing experiment performed in 1887. 

There is also a Coriolis force that vanishes as the body s velocity in the rotating local frame approaches zero. The centrifugal and Coriohs forces are apparent or fictitious forces, in the sense that they are caused by the acceleration of the rotating frame rather than by interactions between particles. When we treat these forces as if they are real forces, we can use Newton s second law of motion to relate the net force on a body and the body s acceleration in the rotating frame (see Sec. G.6). 

Chandrasekhar and Madhusudana have also considered the calculation of the coefficients required in V. The first contribution that these authors examined was the permanent dipole-permanent dipole forces. These were shown to vary as and provided a V dependence to Ui. It was shown however, that this term vanished when the pair potential V12 is averaged over a spherical molecular distribution function. The authors thus discard this term and provide further arguments for its neglect based on the empirical result that permanent dipoles apparently play a minor role in providing the stability of the nematic phase. The second contribution considered was the dispersion forces based on induced dipole-induced dipole interactions and induced dipole-induced quadrupole interactions. As mentioned above, the first of these gives a dependent contribution, while the second provides a contribution depending on The final contribution considered... 

Eq. (4.179) contains (1) the kinetic apparent coefficient k+ (2) the potential term, or driving force related to the thermodynamics of the net reaction (3) the term of resistance, ie, the denominator, which reflects the complexity of reaction, both its multi-step character and its non-hnearity finally, (4) the non-linear term (N k,c)), a polynomial in concentrations and kinetic parameters, which is caused exclusively by nonlinear steps. In the case of a linear mechanism, this term vanishes. In classical kinetics of heterogeneous catalysis (LHHW equations), such term is absent. 

However, Struik has shown by quenching polymer rods under torsion below Tg and investigating the effect of the temperature on the torque that even at this temperature where all segments are assumed to be frozen in, strong forces due to orientation and deformation of chains are measurable. Apparently, the fact that is very small does not imply that the effect of variation of Ze with deformation vanishes nor does it imply that the effect of variations of I must be small. Since the free energy is proportional to the logarithm of 1, it is the relative variation of with deformation that appears in the elastic free energy. 

The partial ionic or electronic currents and conductivities can also be measured by setting the driving force for the other partial current to zero. If one examines the Hebb-Wagner method, it becomes apparent that this nullification also occurs there. Because of the extreme resistance of the ion-blocking electrode to ionic current, the driving force for ionic motion in the MI EC vanishes (V/iion = 0). 

Barber and Hartland present results for several assumed boundary conditions at r=R. Although the quantitative results are different in each case, the qualitative results are consistent. The case used here is that where the shear stress is assumed to vanish at r=R. Although Barber and Hartland present their results in integral form, one can integrate their film drainage rate equation to obtain the following relation between the coalescence time t, the applied force F, the effective contact radius R, the bulk phase viscosity of the film y, the critical collapse distance 6, and the combination r) = k + e of the apparent interfacial dilational viscosity and the intrinsic interfacial shear viscosity ... 

---